1 / 13

Culling the sacred cows: from disability slogans to disability studies

Culling the sacred cows: from disability slogans to disability studies. Dr Tom Shakespeare University of Newcastle t.w.shakespeare@ncl.ac.uk. Debating the social model. Devised within UPIAS, 1970s Becomes ‘big idea’ of disability movement

zorina
Download Presentation

Culling the sacred cows: from disability slogans to disability studies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Culling the sacred cows: from disability slogans to disability studies Dr Tom Shakespeare University of Newcastle t.w.shakespeare@ncl.ac.uk

  2. Debating the social model • Devised within UPIAS, 1970s • Becomes ‘big idea’ of disability movement • Academic formulation in Finkelstein (1980) and Oliver (1990) • Challenges during the 1990s • Practical/political flaws (Morris, Crow, French) • Theoretical flaws (Tremain, Shakespeare & Watson) • Debate continues

  3. “If I had a hammer” Mike Oliver argues that the social model is a tool which works to achieve social change for disabled people Nobody denies the benefits of the social model. But social model exclusivity is an obstacle to progress. “Give a person a hammer, and everything becomes a nail” The social model as a tool

  4. Requirements of a political position • Simple: easy to understand, apply, shout • Direct: this is the priority • Mobilising: private problem to public issue • Persuasive: emotional resonance • Personal benefit: psychological pay off • Political benefit: identity building

  5. Positions or slogans? • Rights not charity! • Piss on pity! • We do not need care! • Disabled by society, not by our bodies! • Free our people! • No Nazi eugenics!

  6. “Make everything as simple as possible. But not simpler”Albert Einstein “I do not trust fervour. Every time it has burst out somewhere it has brought fire, famine, misery... And contempt for man. Fervour is the weapon of choice of the impotent.” Frantz Fanon

  7. Requirements of academic positions • Consistent • Logical • Coherent • Supported by empirical evidence • Credible • Accessible • Relevent • Engaged

  8. Role of disability studies 1. Take your lead from organisations OF disabled people (emancipatory research). Develop political positions. OR 2.Challenge. Test. Develop thinking. Find evidence. Deepen understandings. Apply theory. Develop academic positions. Ask the difficult questions…

  9. Philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point however, is to change it. Karl Marx, Eleventh Thesis on Feuerbach

  10. Thinking the unthinkable? • Impairment prevention is often desirable • People are disabled by their bodies, not just by society • Many disabled people would like a cure • Some special schools do a very good job • Many charities do much good work • Some disabled people want to live in residential situations and that’s okay • Non disabled parents and carers have an important role in advocating for their disabled family members

  11. What is wrong with charity? • Legal status? • Third sector: not state or market • Voluntary ethos • Charity as large bureaucracies • Institutionalisation • Charity advertising • Fund raising • Not controlled by disabled people?

  12. What is right with charity? • Caritas – love – ‘The true revolutionary is guided by strong feelings of love’ (Che Guevara) • Mutual aid • Charity not incompatible with rights • “Charity is impossible without justice, but justice without charity is deformed.” (Levinas)

  13. Ways forward for disability studies? • Open debate, accept pluralism • Question everything • Distinguish emotion from logic – make a place for both • Gather empirical evidence • Learn from other social movements • Remain relevant, accessible, engaged

More Related