1 / 21

Overview of Hospice Payment Reform For VNAA Roundtable

HOSPICE. Overview of Hospice Payment Reform For VNAA Roundtable. Robert J. Simione Managing Principal Simione Healthcare Consultants. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule.

Download Presentation

Overview of Hospice Payment Reform For VNAA Roundtable

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HOSPICE Overview of Hospice Payment Reform For VNAA Roundtable Robert J. Simione Managing Principal Simione Healthcare Consultants

  2. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule • On August 16, 2013, CMS issued the final rule that would update FY 2014 Medicare payment rates and the wage index for hospices. • Under the final rule, hospices would see an estimated 1.0 percent increase in their payments for FY 2014. This would be the result of: • Hospice payment update to the hospice per diem rates of 1.7% • 2.5% increase in the hospital market basket • 0.8% decrease for reductions mandated by law • A 0.7% decrease in payments to hospices due to the updated wage data

  3. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule • BNAF phase-out • The final rule would implement the fifth year of the seven-year BNAF phase-out, reducing the BNAF by 15 percent. • Coding clarification • Hospice providers should not use certain non-specific diagnoses that are not the principal diagnoses. • Hospices should code the principal diagnosis using the underlying condition that is the main focus of the patient’s care. • Hospice quality reporting • Hospices that fail to meet quality reporting requirements will receive a two percentage point reduction to their market basket update beginning in FY 2014. • Medicare Hospice Cost Report • There were proposed changes to the Medicare hospice cost report which are still under discussion.

  4. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule • Patient Experience of Care • The rule proposes to require use of the Hospice Experience of Care Survey beginning in 2015. • CMS includes participation in the survey as a quality-reporting requirement for hospices to receive their full annual payment update beginning in FY 2017. • Affordable Care Act reforms • As mandated in the Affordable Care Act, CMS must reform hospice payments. • This must take place no earlier than October 2013. • CMS is authorized to collect additional data that will be used to revise the hospice payment system.

  5. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule • FY 2014 Final Payment Rates • Routine Home Care $156.06 • Continuous Home Care $910.78 • Inpatient Respite Care $161.42 • General Inpatient Care $694.19 • Continuous Home Care • Full Rate = 24 hours of care = $37.95 hourly rate • 2014 Hospice Cap $26,157.50

  6. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule • For agencies failing to report quality data in 2013 will have their market basket update reduced by 2 percentage points in FY 2014. • FY 2014 Final Payment Rates for Hospices that DO NOT Submit the Required Quality Data • Routine Home Care $152.99 • Continuous Home Care $892.87 • Inpatient Respite Care $158.24 • General Inpatient Care $680.54 • Continuous Home Care • Full Rate = 24 hours of care = $37.20 hourly rate

  7. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule • Update on Reform Options: Overview • Abt Associates is the hospice contractor in charge of developing a new hospice payment model. • Abt is continuing to conduct analyses of various payment reform models. These models include a U-shaped model of resource which MedPAC recommended be adopted. • A hospice’s costs typically follow a U-shaped curve, with higher costs at the beginning and end of a stay, and lower costs in the middle of the stay. • Payment under a U-shaped model would be higher at the beginning and end of a hospice stay, and lower in the middle portion of the stay.

  8. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule • Update on Reform Options: U-Shaped Curve • Abt analysis found that very short hospice stays have a flatter curve than the U-shaped curve seen for longer stays and that average hospice stays are much higher. • The short stays are less U-shaped because there is not a lower cost middle period between the time of admission and time of death. • Abt is considering a tiered approach with payment tiers based on length of stay. • Abt is also considering a short-stay add-on payment, similar to the home health Low Utilization Payment Amount (LUPA) add-on which would improve payment accuracy if the current per diem system were retained. • As Abt collects more accurate diagnosis data, including data on related conditions, Abt will also evaluate whether case-mix should play a role in determining payments.

  9. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule • Update on Reform Options: Tiered System • Features of a Tiered System include: • U-shaped payments • Higher payments for extremely short stays • Lower payments for beneficiaries who die in hospice without skilled visits at the end of life • The tiered model is applicable for hospice stays that end in death. • Abt created seven potential payment “groups” or categories based on average daily resource use. • This classifies each hospice day of care to the category that best fits. • Rates are set based on the relative costs of care for that day within the length of stay.

  10. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule • Update on Reform Options: Tiered System • Abt established a relative or “implied weight” for each of the seven groups. • The implied weight is equal to the ratio of the average resource use for the specific group divided by the total average resource use across all routine home care days in the analysis. • Payment for each day in the group would be equal to the routine home care base rate multiplied by the implied weight.

  11. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule • Update on Reform Options: Tiered System • The following are the seven groups with their associated “implied weights”: • Group 1: RHC care that occurs between days 1 and day 5 of a beneficiary’s lifetime length of stay. Implied weight: 2.30 • Group 2: RHC care that occurs between days 6 and day 10 of a beneficiary’s lifetime length of stay. Implied weight: 1.11 • Group 3: RHC care that occurs between days 11 and day 30 of a beneficiary’s lifetime length of stay. Implied weight: 0.97 • Group 4: RHC care that occurs on day 31 or later of a beneficiary’s lifetime length of stay. Implied weight: 0.86

  12. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule • Update on Reform Options: Tiered System • The following are the seven groups with their associated “implied weights”: • Group 5: RHC care that occurs during the last 7 days of a beneficiary’s lifetime length of stay and the beneficiary is discharged dead. Beneficiary receives visiting service - nursing, aide, MSS, therapy - during the last 2 days of life if the last two days of life are RHC or the last two days of life are not RHC. Implied weight: 2.44 • Group 6: RHC care that occurs during the last 7 days of a beneficiary’s lifetime length of stay and the beneficiary is discharged dead. Beneficiary does not receive visiting service - nursing, aide, MSS, therapy - during the last 2 days of life. Last 2 days of life are RHC. Implied weight: 0.91 • Group 7: RHC care when the beneficiary’s lifetime length of hospice is 5 days or less, each day of hospice is RHC, and the beneficiary is discharged deceased. Implied weight: 3.64

  13. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule • Update on Reform Options: Tiered System

  14. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule Example of Tiered Reimbursement Based on a Connecticut Rate

  15. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule

  16. Overview of the Hospice Final Rule • Update on Reform Options: Routine Home Care Rebasing • Abt will also review the hospice routine home care rate. No proposals or recommendations were made yet. • Rebasing the routine home care rate was discussed. • If rebasing were done, it would be done to the three clinical service components of (nursing, home health aide, social services/therapy). • Such rebasing would result in a rebased rate of $140.44 in FY 2014. • The FY 2014 rebased rate would be a 10.1% reduction in the FY 2014 proposed routine home care payment rate of $156.21. • If rebasing were to be done for FY 2014, there would be a reduction in hospice payments of $1.6 billion. • “Rebasing the clinical service components of the routine home care payment is one of several approaches to hospice payment reform that CMS could consider for revising the routine home care payment rate.”

  17. Other Hospice Reimbursement Issues • 2% Sequestration Adjustment still in Effect • Sequestration is a payment reduction and not a rate change. It is not cumulative in its impact. • The Tiered approach is not final, ABT is still looking at other Hospice payment models • There is still consideration for Site of Care Adjustment for Hospice Patients in Nursing Facilities • Perception that patients in nursing facilities receive more hospice aide services than their counterparts in the community and therefore substituting for the facility.

  18. How to prepare for Medicare cuts • FORECASTING • Hospices should be developing a template that models the potential Tiered Reimbursement systems being proposed by ABT and MedPac. • They should be comparing it against the current reimbursement to measure the impact on Medicare revenue. • Based on the results of the analysis they should looking at strategic initiatives to minimize any negative impact it might have on its gross and net margins.

  19. How to prepare for Medicare cuts • DATA • The clinical, financial and technology teams should be working together to identify what data is needed to do the modeling and if it is available with your current software program or whether it needs to be developed. • Information such as visit utilization over the Length of Stay(broken down by the recommended groupings); direct cost of services provided. • Percentage of patients in Skilled Nursing Facilities and the utilization service for those patients especially Home Health Aides.

  20. Manage by metrics • Metrics to Manage by: • Patient Case Load by Service (ie; Case Managers, MSW, Home Health Aide, etc.) • Cost per Day by Service • Cost per Day (Drugs, DME, Medical Supplies etc.) • Revenue per Day • Gross Profit Margin • ADC • Capture Rate (Admissions/Referrals) • Facility – Occupancy Rate

  21. Manage by metrics • Metrics to Manage by: • Referrals by Referral Source trended monthly • Payer Mix • Service Utilization • Visits by Discipline by length of Stay • Diagnosis • Length of Stay based on Discharges • Discharged Alive • ETC, ETC

More Related