1 / 40

Ecological Principles of Agroforestry Systems: Agroforestry Systems 471/571 September 3, 2009

Ecological Principles of Agroforestry Systems: Agroforestry Systems 471/571 September 3, 2009. Woody plants – unique characteristics. Lignin – rigid structure Support – elevated canopy, vertical structure Distribution of resources Complex types of SOM

zyta
Download Presentation

Ecological Principles of Agroforestry Systems: Agroforestry Systems 471/571 September 3, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ecological Principles of Agroforestry Systems:Agroforestry Systems 471/571September 3, 2009

  2. Woody plants – unique characteristics • Lignin – rigid structure • Support – elevated canopy, vertical structure • Distribution of resources • Complex types of SOM • Longer residence times (lignin more recalcitrant) • Humus – enhances soil fertility, • Greater longevity / persistence • Competitive advantages & disadvantages

  3. Tree-crop competition limits production of simultaneous systems Idealized system in extension manual Reality: severe tree-crop competition

  4. Types of interactions • Complementary / facilitative • Competitive • Supplementary

  5. Competitive and complementary interactions…

  6. Resource capture by single and mixed crop-tree systems (Over-yielding) (Under-yielding)

  7. Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) Crop A combined + Crop B combined Crop A alone Crop B alone Example: 75 + 110 = 1.48 100 150 If LER > 1 = positive interaction • Examples from semiarid India (Ong et al. 1991) • Sorghum/pigeon pea: LER = 1.4 biomass, 1.5 grain yield • Leucaena/pigeon pea: LER = 1 • but crop reduced 30-90% • Leucaena alone = 20-37% greater yield

  8. Can an agroforestry system out-yield sole crop systems? • Challenge: maximizing complementary interactions and minimizing competitive interactions

  9. Competitive-Complementary Interactions in Agroforestry Systems • Give examples of: • Competition (above- & below-ground) • Complementarity (above- & below-ground • What is the limiting resource and how does it affect these interactions? • What are some management interventions to enhance complementary interactions and minimize competitive interactions?

  10. Reduced plant stress (ET, radiation) Reduced stress in livestock Can increase protein content & digestibility (pasture) Positive aboveground interactions • Microclimate modification • Water vapor/humidity • Decreased wind • Shading • Decreased temperature

  11. Positive aboveground interactions… • Shade can improve crop water use efficiency) • C4 vs C3 plants • C3: light saturated at ~50% maximum radiation • C4: continue to increase photosynthesis

  12. Effects on microclimate • Trees can increase water locally by shading or intercepting clouds or wind-driven rain.

  13. Weed/Pest Control • Allelopathic effects of tree mulch, prunings (ailanthone from tree of heaven, monoterpenes from eucalyptus, mimosine from L. leucocephala, caffeine from coffee) • Plant-insect interactions • Beneficial insects: soybean aphid control

  14. Managing negative aboveground interactions • Shading may lead to reduced yield • Pruning • Thinning plantations - temporarily increase grass growth • Trees have high plasticity – quickly fill in available growing space (leaves, roots)

  15. Management: Shade tolerant species • Manage understory crops over time to plant more and more shade tolerant crops as tree canopy closes • Complementarity if products from widely-spaced trees compensate for low yielding crops

  16. Managing negative aboveground interactions • Concentration of livestock • Bank erosion near streams • Compaction • Over-grazing

  17. Positive belowground interactions • Increased total resource-use efficiency • Niche partitioning • “Safety net role” – deep rooted trees • Greater total productivity per unit land area (LER > 1) • Hydraulic lift – redistribution of water from deep to shallow soil be deeply rooted trees • May influence NPP, nutrient cycling, & water balance

  18. Example of Increased Resource-Use Efficiency • Bear Creek Buffer System: Addition of woody species to switchgrass buffers increased removal efficiency of nutrients and sediment • Positive effect on other ecosystems services: water quality, aquatic habitat & biodiversity, soil conservation

  19. Bear Creek Buffer SystemSediment & nutrient capture functions: resource use efficiency + safety net concept

  20. Positive belowground interactions • Soil fertility enrichment • Litter/prunings, N fixation, P from mycorrhizae • Many reports in tropics, few from temperate zones • Few species: Robinia, Prosopis, Alnus • Herbaceous legumes (alley-cropping, silvopastures) • Radiata pine with subclover • Black Walnut with leguminous forage crops

  21. Alley cropping with N-fixing trees (NFTs) + mulch - mulch

  22. Nutrients: In the short run, NFTs add N only when leaves are cut and used as mulch

  23. Nutrients: In the long run, litterfall from NFTs can add N to the system

  24. Negative belowground interactions • Resource competition… • Water • Nutrients

  25. The resource in least supply will be limiting Managing competition for resources N deficiency P deficiency

  26. Faidherbia albida • Grows in arid climate under broad range of soil fertility conditions. • Unique phenology – drops leaves early in rainy season. • Mixed results: both yield increases & decreases occur in crops growing under trees • Why???? Low nutrients High nutrients (Same water) Trees = no added nutrient benefit + compete for water Trees = Increase nutrients – outweighs negative effects of reduced water

  27. Negative belowground interactions • Allelopathy • Juglone in black walnut (but, low concentrations in field conditions, may be oxidized to non-toxic forms) • Tropics: many tree species produce allelochemicals through leaf litter that provide pest control for crops • Exotics

  28. Do you agree with these concepts? • Resource capture = productivity of what? • Other values: ecosystem services, market value, preferences, etc. • This is just one way to evaluate AFS! Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) = Crop A combined + Crop B combined Crop A alone Crop B alone * Per unit land area If LER > 1 = positive interaction

  29. Complementarity vs. Competition on the landscape scale • Multiple considerations • Profitability / market value • Ecosystem services & sustainability • Contrasting human interests & values • Context • Industrialized vs. developing countries • Costs (labor, other inputs) • Self-sufficiency vs. marketing • Resiliency (diversification) • Policy incentives (subsidies, investments)

  30. Bear Creek field trip • List different types of ES that can be obtained from buffers? • What are some important positive (complementary) and negative (competitive) ecological, social, and economic interactions? • How can “current” buffers be managed for maximizing ES and complementary interactions? • What other products or ES values could be incorporated into buffer systems in the future?

  31. Groups • 1: Hannah, Jarett, Dan Mahony, Rick • 2: Jessica, Justin, Dan West • 3: Graduate students

More Related