1 / 33

Stato di CDF

Stato di CDF. 22 Settembre 2005 Giovanni Punzi (Pisa). Highlights. Run IIb upgrades completi all’85% Completamento previsto nella prima parte del 2006 SVT Upgrade 2/3 completo e operativo Nuovo record di luminosita’: 1.4 E32 (4 Agosto) 1 fb-1 su nastro (10 Settembre)

zytka
Download Presentation

Stato di CDF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Stato di CDF 22 Settembre 2005 Giovanni Punzi (Pisa)

  2. Highlights • Run IIb upgrades completi all’85% • Completamento previsto nella prima parte del 2006 • SVT Upgrade 2/3 completo e operativo • Nuovo record di luminosita’: 1.4 E32 (4 Agosto) • 1 fb-1 su nastro (10 Settembre) • Il rivelatore e’ stabile e funziona bene • Software di ricostruzione e’ stabile • La latenza tra la presa dati e la disponibilita’ dei dati processati per l’analisi e’ stata ridotta a ~ 6 settimane • Shutdown rimandato al 2006 (date ancora incerte) • Gli istogrammi accumulano statistica…

  3. 2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003 2004 2005 Record 1.4 x 1032 ~85% of Run IIb Upgrade Projects were commissioned with beam during this period. Data Taking Efficiencies Initial Luminosity (1030 cm-1s-1) Data Taking Efficiency 83%

  4. Recorded Data up to Aug. 2004 Recorded: 530 pb-1 Physics: 320 - 470 pb-1 Data up to Aug. 2005 Recorded: 950 pb-1 Physics: 620 ~ 880 pb-1 QCD Electroweak, Beyond SM B Top SM Higgs Sep-Dec ‘04 Shutdown COT Compromised Period Store Number (Aug.23,2005) Data for Physics

  5. Achieved vs Projected Integrated Luminosity On the path to 8 fb-1 integrated luminosity in 2009

  6. Top Line: all run II upgrades work Bottom line: none work Projected Peak Luminosity

  7. First e-cooling demonstration – 07/15/05 Pbar beam: 63.5e10 Barrier-bucket bunched. Bunch length 1.7-us Tr. emittance (95%,n) kept at 4-pi mm-mrad Electron beam current: 200 mA Traces are 15 min apart

  8. CDFII Challenge Continuare a raccogliere dati efficientemente a luminosita’ crescenti fino al 2009

  9. DAQ / Trigger Specifications

  10. L(1032) Lpeak = 3 x 1032 In 3.5 hours, L < 1.5 x 1032 66% 34% hours Physics Triggers a 3 x 1032 cm-2 s-1 • La Trigger Table attuale funziona bene fino a ~1.5 x 1032 cm-2s-1 • Significativo e continuo sforzo di miglioramento su molti fronti • Trigger upgrades: migliore purezza con meno processing time. • Alcuni prescale sono stati addirittura rimossi (multibody B trigger !) • Veto high multiplicity events • Trigger Table in sviluppo per ~3 x 1032 cm-2s-1 • 2/3 della statistica comunque raccolti a L<1.5 x 1032 • Strategy: high purity triggers for high luminosity, inclusive heavy flavor triggers at low luminosity (allow larger deadtime) • Straw Trigger Table in Ottobre 2005. • Scelta finale dei triggers basata su priorita’ di fisica e purezza • Importante contributo italiano anche qui.

  11. Run II Publication Status http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/physics/pub_run2/ • 2005 Goal: • 40 submitted papers • 2005 Status: • 20 submitted papers (9 published, 2 accepted) • 10 papers - drafts under collaboration’s review • Results approved by CDF physics groups • Drafts approved by internal reviewers • “Godparents committee” assigned for each paper. • 27 papers - under godparents committee’s review • Results approved by CDF physics groups

  12. B/charm physics Topics: Bhh (ACP, BR), Lbpp, BsDsp & lnDs (for Bs mixing), Blifetimes, Bsff, BdfK*, BfK (ACP, BR), D0hh (BR, ACP), D+πππ, pentaquarks, Groups involved: Padova, Pisa, Roma, Trieste High-pt physics Topics: Zbb, Higgs searches, top physics, hadronic top, top backgrounds, b-tagging, W+jets, forward W’s Groups involved: Bologna, Padova (Trento), Pisa, Roma Contributions to crucial analysis tools Computing, sample skimming Particle Identification with TOF and COT dE/dx High-Pt b-tagging development Jet Energy resolution and scale Most work in close cooperation amongst Italian groups A lot of work in close cooperation with non-Italian groups Italian group contributions to analysis Wide range of activities: today only a few highlights

  13. W+ b-jet n t t jet W- jet b-jet Mtop Current Best: Fit contemporaneo 2-D alla massa del top e alla scala dei jet (JES) da Mjj(W) nel campione lepton+jets Mjj(W) Prospects • W ->2 jets calibrano la scala dei jet negli eventi top stessi • Stessa scala per b-jet e light quark (per ora)

  14. Charmless BVV • BdfK*: yields 123 (CDF 360pb-1) (compare to 173 (Belle 250fb-1) [hep ex/050313] Equivalent uncertainty on polarization measurement Bsff:First observation with 180 pb-1 [PRL 95,031801 (2005)].Analysis update underway: 12 events  44 events (360 pb-1). • Update BR measurement. Measuring polarization: expect 0.10-0.15 resolution on long. polarization (similar to B-factory first PRL) estimated yield: 123 events estimated yield: 44 events BdfK* Bsff

  15. Verso la misura del Bs mixing • Le estrapolazioni assumono di integrare la meta’ della luminosita’ dal 2007 in poi (B-physics solo da meta’ store) • Sensibilita’ al range favorito dal fit di unitarieta’ • In case of no signal 95% C.L. up to 30 ps-1 with 4 fb-1

  16. ~70 physicists ( 22 italians, 9 phd/post-doc) in CDF are actively involved in the Bs mixing project Improving the trigger strategy Understanding the detector B Lifetime Measurements Flavor Tagging B0 Mixing Bs Mixing Big collaborative effort: Analyse 3 different datasets Reconstruct 0(20) different decay modes Perform 2 parallel analysis for both hadronic and semileptonic modes Study 4 different tagging algorithms TOF and dE/dx calibrations CDF “Bs Mixing Group” Here I mention just two examples of italian contribution

  17. Same side Kaon tagging • Exploits the charge correlation between the b quark and the leading product of b hadronization. Based on PID capability. • Big hopes: initial studies indicate D2~3% vs current ~1% B0 p-K*0 B- Measure K distr. in data Tune MC  D2 p+K+ Bs K- K*0

  18. Campione addizionale diBs semileptonici 2 displaced track trigger 4GeV-lepton + 1 displaced track trigger + • Additional new sample overlap with the one already used ~ 20% • Effective ~ X 3 more semileptonic Bs yield to be used for MIXING

  19. p K p Basic tools: PID • Moderate separation at CDFaccurate modeling is crucial • Great effort devoted both to TOF calibration (better resolution) + t0 (reduced tails) and COT dE/dx calibration over wide bg range • Central to many analyses: B reco, Flavor tagging Parameterize and combine TOF+dE/dx in a single likelihood  Maximal performance from a unified tool TOF dE/dx • J/ee, gee • J/mm • D*±D0ps(kp) ps • Lpp

  20. Charmless BPP • Update analisi in corso: 180 pb-1 360 pb-1 Total yield ~2600 ev (was 900) • Estimated yields: ~1600 BdK+p - ~400Bdp+p - • ~700 BsK+K- : (first observed w/ 180 pb-1) • Misura accurata BR (large U-spin breaking?) • CP state: Misura lifetime: ~light DGs • ?? BsKp Visibile… o contraddizione con la teoria. • Limite da 180 pb-1<5.4·10-6. Expect (6÷10)·10-6 • ?? Bspp , BdKKConstrain/misura contributi di annichilazione (BR(Bspp) piu’ grande, meno fondo piu’ sensibile. CDF ha gia’ il Best Limit da 180pb-1 ) ( 250 fb-1 BaBar) • 180 pb-1 • 360 pb-1

  21. Direct ACP(B0 K) CDF 180pb-1 HFAG 2005 Babar -0.133  0.030 (stat.)  0.009 (syst.) Belle -0.113  0.022 (stat.)  0.008 (syst.) • ACP compatible with B-factories, systematic uncertainty comparable • In progress: 360pb-1  (ACP)= 4% World best: 2.2% (Belle) • Full RunII statistics: (ACP) 1% • Other large direct ACP around the corner (unobserved modes!): • BsKπ (sensitive to , similar to Bdππ, but self-tagging) • bpπ 360 pb-1 ~650 pb-1 Lint

  22. Conclusioni • Il Tevatron sta seguendo le previsioni piu’ ottimistiche • Gli upgrades di CDF sono quasi completati • La collaborazione e’ impegnata a fondo nello sfruttare la luminosita’ per un ricco programma di fisica

  23. BACKUP

  24.  Back DGs / Gs • BS J/y fm+m- K+K- • BVV decays: Heavy and Light state decay with distinct angular distributions and different lifetimes. • Result (260 pb-1) • 1/4 heavy - 3/4 light state • Lifetime - theavy ~ 2 x tlight • DGS / GS = 0.71 +0.24-0.28 ± 0.01 • Lifetime difference measures “same” CKM element as Dm (oscillation frequency) • Exciting!! Need more data • ~ 5 % sensitivity by 2009 • Dms = 10 ps-1 DGS / GS= 7% • Test still possible CP violation effect in Bs mixing

  25. Bs KK • Perfect U-spin simmetry would predict BR(BsKK)/BR(BdKpi)~1, but some calculations predict  2[A. Khodjamirian et al.,Phys.Rev. D68 (2003) 114007]. • Current result favors the second case, but resolution is insufficient • Current resolution BR(BsKK)/BR(BdKpi)  1.70.31(stat.)more accurate measurement very desirable • Test with 360 pb-1 will be decisive: expect resolution 0.14(stat.) . 360 pb-1 Lint

  26. Silicon Detectors • Radiation damage • > 90% of total radiation is due to collisions: NIM A514, 188-193 (2003) • Bias voltage scans as luminosity accumulates • Study collected charge (hits on tracks) and mean noise • Measurements agree with predictions up to 1 fb-1. • Efforts to increase the Silicon lifetime • Lowered Silicon operating temp. gradually from -6oC to -10oC. • Thermally isolated SVX from COT inert regions such that the silicon can be kept cold during COT work. Predicted Silicon Lifetime (note the large uncertainties) 8 fb-1 Lifetime 0 10 fb-1 20 fb-1 30 fb-1 40 fb-1

  27. Run IIb Project Status • Trigger and DAQ Upgrades • Level-1 Track Trigger (XFT): • Add z (stereo) info for 3D tracking - In production • COT TDC modification to achieve L2 rate of 1000 Hz (readout time) • 12 out of 20 crates are operational. • Level 2 decision system: faster,flexible - operational since April 2005 • Level 2 Silicon Vertex Trigger (SVT) • Faster - 3 step upgrade: the first 2 steps are operational. • Event Builder: operational since August 2005 • Level-3 Computer • 1st procurement placed(64 PCs) - replace current system in Nov’05 • 2nd procurement ready(64 PCs) - complete ~Jan.06 • Data Logging (20 MB/s  60 MB/s) • 1st step operational (~35MB/s), complete by end of 2005 Installation & commissioning parasitically without interrupting operations.

  28. Run IIb Project Status • Detector (Calorimeter) Upgrades • Central Preshower upgrade • Replacing with a finer segmentation system for higher lum. • operational since early 2005 • Electromagnetic Timing • New system for cosmic ray rejection • operational since early 2005 • Run IIb Status • The project is ~85% complete and operational. • 100% by early 2006. • commissioned without interrupting operations.

  29. Extrapolation of Trigger Rates Bunch-by-bunch luminosity gives a better lever arm for the extrapolation. Level-2 high pT electron Level-2 high pT muon (0.6 < || < 1.1) a highly non-linear behavior ~50% bandwidth at 3 x 1032 cm-2s-1 ~1% bandwidth at 3 x 1032 cm-2s-1

  30. Example of planned improvements: XFT upgrade Confirmation of XFT tracks by stereo layers is expected to yield a substantial reduction of fakes

  31. Straw Trigger Table - Projected L2 Rates

  32. Straw Trigger Table - Projected L2 Rates Triggers for W, Z, Top, WH, ZH, HWW, SUSY (partial), LED, Z’ without XFT upgrade with XFT upgrade ~30% of bandwidth at 3x1032 cm-2s-1 Studying further improvement ~75% of bandwidth at 3x1032 cm-2s-1 No room for B & some of new phenomena

  33. Peak Luminosity = 3E32 34% 66% Inst. Luminosity (E32) hours Typical Projected Store Evolution

More Related