1 / 12

Performance Management and Appraisal

Chapter 9. Part 3 | Training and Development. Performance Management and Appraisal. After studying this chapter, you should be able to:. Evaluate and improve the appraisal form in Figure 9–1. Describe the appraisal process.

Albert_Lan
Download Presentation

Performance Management and Appraisal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 9 Part 3 | Training and Development Performance Management and Appraisal © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. www.bzupages.com

  2. After studying this chapter, you should be able to: • Evaluate and improve the appraisal form in Figure 9–1. • Describe the appraisal process. • Develop, evaluate, and administer at least four performance appraisal tools. • Explain and illustrate the problems to avoid in appraising performance. • List and discuss the pros and cons of six appraisal methods. • Perform an effective appraisal interview. • Discuss the pros and cons of using different raters to appraise a person’s performance. © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

  3. ComparingPerformance Appraisal and Performance Management Performance Appraisal:Setting work standards, assessing performance, and providing feedback to employees to motivate, correct, and continue their performance. Performance Management:An integrated approach to ensuring that an employee’s performance supports and contributes to the organization’s strategic aims. Basic Concepts in PerformanceManagement and Appraisal © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

  4. Total Quality The Performance Management Approach Appraisal Issues Strategic Focus Why Performance Management? © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

  5. Guidelines for Effective Goal Setting Assign Specific Goals Assign Measurable Goals Assign Challenging but Doable Goals Encourage Participation Defining the Employee’s Goals and Work Standards © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

  6. Setting unclear objectives Time-consuming appraisal process Problems with MBO Conflict with subordinates over objectives Using MBO © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

  7. Potential Rating Scale Appraisal Problems Unclear Standards Halo Effect Central Tendency Leniency or Strictness Bias Appraising Performance: Problems and Solutions © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

  8. How to Avoid Appraisal Problems Know Problems Use the Right Tool Train Supervisors Control Outside Influences Keep a Diary Appraising Performance: Problems and Solutions (cont’d) © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

  9. Self-Rating Immediate Supervisor Potential Appraisers Peers Subordinates 360-Degree Feedback Rating Committee Who Should Do the Appraising? © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

  10. Satisfactory—Promotable Satisfactory—Not Promotable Types of Appraisal Interviews Unsatisfactory—Correctable Unsatisfactory—Uncorrectable The Appraisal Interview © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

  11. Guidelines for Conducting an Interview Talk in terms of objective work data. Don’t get personal. Encourage the person to talk. Don’t tiptoe around. The Appraisal Interview (cont’d) © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

  12. performance appraisal performance management graphic rating scale alternation ranking method paired comparison method forced distribution method critical incident method behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS) management by objectives (MBO) electronic performance monitoring (EPM) unclear standards halo effect central tendency strictness/leniency bias appraisal interview K E Y T E R M S © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

More Related