1 / 23

Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology. Phil Gibson OU TSI October 20, 2011. Miller, J.D., E.C. Scott, and S. Okamato. 2006. Public Acceptance of Evolution. Science . 313: 765-766. The Basic Ideas of Tree-thinking.

agrata
Download Presentation

Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking in Intro Biology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking inIntro Biology Phil Gibson OU TSI October 20, 2011

  2. Miller, J.D., E.C. Scott, and S. Okamato. 2006. Public Acceptance of Evolution. Science. 313: 765-766.

  3. The Basic Ideas of Tree-thinking “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution." Theodosius Dobzhansky (1973) “Nothing in evolution makes sense except in the light of phylogeny.” (Society of Systematic Biologists 2001). “Nothing makes sense in phylogeny except in the light of DNA.” (Kalinowski et al. 2010)

  4. Tree-Thinking

  5. Tree-Thinking

  6. What we want to know • Question #1: What is the relationship between ability to read phylogenetic trees relate and acceptance of evolution? • Question #2: How does student understanding of natural selection and genetics relate to understanding and acceptance of evolution? • Question #3: Will a tree-thinking based curriculum using active learning modules improve student understanding and acceptance of evolution and evolutionary theory?

  7. BIOL 1134 Evolution, Ecology, & Diversity 1. Encourage understanding and appreciation for major, modern biological thought and theories: • Unity and diversity of life (DNA and genetic variation) • History of life (evolution and phylogeny) • Relationship between structure and function (adaptation) • Focus on life at the individual, population, community, and ecosystem levels (hierarchical organization, interdependence) • Develop student skills, understanding, and appreciation for the nature of science. • Thinking, reasoning, and problem-solving in biology. • Prediction and hypothesis testing in science. • Data collection, analysis, and interpretation • Group collaboration and interactions.

  8. Tree-thinking Curriculum Structure DNA & Genetics Inheritance & Pedigrees Phylogenetics Read & Construct Trees Evolution Concepts & Mechanisms Application (Biodiversity surveys, adaptations, speciation etc.)

  9. Components of the curriculum. • Genetic basis of phylogeny & tree thinking: genetics, inheritance, and population genetics • Principles of tree-thinking: how-to of phylogeny construction and interpretation • Application of tree-thinking: opportunities to collect and analyze data, processes of hypothesis development and testing • Modules: Case study, group inquiry, active learning

  10. Pedigree Analysis & Genetics

  11. Phylogeny of Domestic Dog Breeds – Result of Artificial Selection

  12. Platypus Reproduction & Mammalian Evolution

  13. Pollination and Floral Evolution

  14. A Deadly Passion: Evolution of Sexual Cannibalism Scorpion Praying mantis Australian redback spider

  15. Assessment & Evaluation • Measure of the Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution (MATE): 20 question Likert-scale survey (Rutledge & Sadler 2007) • Tree-thinking Challenge, Understanding Phylogenetic Trees, Tree Thinking Concept Inventory Variety of questions to read and construct phylogenetic trees. (Baum et al. 2005, Meir et al. 2007, Neagle 2009) • Concept Inventory of Natural Selection, Genetics Concept Assessment (Anderson & Fisher 2002, Smith et al. 2008)

  16. MATE pre-post Comparison

  17. Tree Reading Assessments

  18. MATE & TTCI Spring 2011

  19. MATE, Natural Selection & Genetics

  20. Normalized Learning Gain

  21. Deeper Analysis & the Education Literature • The education literature is rich with techniques for further analysis • Item Analysis, Discrimination Index calculations, Cronbach’s αprovide further insights that basic statistics don’t reveal. • Further analysis of specific questions and answers.

  22. What we’ve learned so far. . . • Tree-thinking curriculum appears to increase understanding and acceptance of evolutionary theory. • Acceptance of evolution is related to tree-thinking ability knowledge of natural selection, and knowledge of genetics. • Better assessments are needed. • There’s more work to do!

  23. Acknowledgements • National Science Foundation • DUE #0940835 • The University of Oklahoma • College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Botany and Microbiology, Department of Zoology • J. Cooper, M. Jones, S. Rhodes, A. Makowicz, C. Poindexter, M. Gibson, D. Washecheck All research conducted under OU IRB# 12682

More Related