1 / 51

Medicina utemeljena na dokazima

Medicina utemeljena na dokazima. Kolegij: Istraživanja u biomedicini i zdravstvu III Seminar 4: Kritička procjena dokaza. Što je EBM u praksi?. Koraci u medicini utemeljenoj na dokazima Korak 1 : Postavljanje pitanja na koje se MOŽE odgovoriti Korak 2: Pronalaženje najboljeg dokaza

andersoni
Download Presentation

Medicina utemeljena na dokazima

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Medicina utemeljena na dokazima Kolegij: Istraživanja u biomedicini i zdravstvu III Seminar 4: Kritička procjena dokaza

  2. Što je EBM u praksi? • Koraci u medicini utemeljenoj na dokazima • Korak 1: Postavljanje pitanja na koje se MOŽE odgovoriti • Korak 2: Pronalaženje najboljeg dokaza • Korak 3: Brza kritička procjena dokaza • Korak 4: Primjena dokaza • Korak 5: Procjena efektivnosti i efikasnosti procesa

  3. 3. Kritička prosudba dokaza • Jesu li rezultati istraživanja valjani? • Kakvi su rezultati? • Mogu li se rezultati primijeniti na konkretnog bolesnika?

  4. Primjer: RCT Valjanost istraživanja: • Je li kliničko pitanje jasno definirano? • Je li raspodjela ispitanika u skupine bila slučajna (randomizacija)? • Je li randomizacijski slijed bio poznat liječniku koji prima ispitanike? • Jesu li analizirani svi ispitanici ili je analiza bila prema prethodnom planu (eng. intention to treat)? • Jesu li ispitanici u kontrolnoj i pokusnoj skupini podudarni u odnosu na poznate prognostičke čimbenike? • Jesu li ispitanici/liječnici/ispitivači svjesni kojoj skupini pripadaju? • Je li praćenje ispitanika bilo potpuno? • Jesu li podatci primjereno statistički obrađeni?

  5. Primjer: ”Susjeda Vas pita hoće li pastile s cinkom pomoći njezinoj 10-godišnjoj kćeri da lakše preboli prehladu?” • Istraživači navode da je istraživanje randomizirano i na koji je način randomizacija provedena; • Od 124 djece u ispitivanoj skupini, 7 (6%) ih je prekinulo istraživanje, a od 125 djece u kontrolnoj skupini istraživanje je prekinulo troje (2%). • Tijekom analize, obrađeni su svi ispitanici, bez obzira na odustajanje (engl., intention to treat analysis); • Autori navode i podrobno prikazuju parametre koji upućuju na sličnost ispitanika u kontrolnoj i pokusnoj skupini; • Autori također navode da ni djeca niti istraživači koji su davali lijek, nisu znali koji ispitanik što dobiva; • Na kraju, uvjereni ste da je dokazna snaga toga istraživanja dovoljno visoka, i daje mogućnost iskrivljenja rezultata (bias), mala.

  6. Primjer: RCT Rezultat istraživanja: Mjere učinka liječenja • Relativno smanjenje rizika (RRR=relative risk reduction) • Apsolutno smanjenje rizika (ARR=absolute risk reduction) • Broj ispitanika koji je potreban za liječenje (NNT=1/ARR) • 95% raspon pouzdanosti (95%CI) STATISTIKA!!

  7. Primjer: ”Susjeda Vas pita hoće li pastile s cinkom pomoći njezinoj 10-godišnjoj kćeri da lakše preboli prehladu?”

  8. Primjer: RCT Primjenjivost rezultata na konkretnog bolesnika • Jesu li ispitanici u istraživanju slični bolesniku na kojeg želimo primijeniti ispitivani postupak? • Jesu li ispitani svi klinički važni ishodi? • Može li se liječenje provesti u okruženju (engl. setting) u kojemu se bolesnik nalazi? • Postoje li drugi oblici liječenja? • Je li dobit liječenja vrijedna u odnosu na mogući rizik i cijenu?

  9. 4. Klinička primjena dokaza • Upute za kliničku praksu • Analiza odlučivanja: vjerojatnost (probability) x subjektivna ocjena stanja (utility) 5. Vrjednovanje

  10. Što sve treba biti u članku koji opisuje RCT • CONSORT statement http://www.consort-statement.org/ Popis za provjeru Dijagram toka

  11. CONSORT: checklist (25 items)

  12. CONSORT:flow diagram

  13. CONSORT items and examplesTitle and abstract Title and abstract 1a Identification as a randomised trial in the title 1b Structured summary of trial design, methods, results, and conclusions (for specific guidance see CONSORT for abstracts)

  14. CONSORT items and examplesIntroduction Background and objectives 2a Scientific background and explanation of rationale 2b Specific objectives or hypotheses

  15. CONSORT items and examplesIntroduction

  16. CONSORT items and examplesMethods Trial design 3a Description of trial design (such as parallel, factorial) including allocation ratio 3b Important changes to methods after trial commencement (such as eligibility criteria), with reasons Participants 4a Eligibility criteria for participants 4b Settings and locations where the data were collected

  17. CONSORT items and examplesMethods

  18. CONSORT items and examplesMethods

  19. CONSORT items and examplesMethods Interventions 5 The interventions for each group with sufficient details to allow replication, including how and when they were actually administered Outcomes 6a Completely defined pre-specified primary and secondary outcome measures, including how and when they were assessed 6b Any changes to trial outcomes after the trial commenced, with reasons

  20. CONSORT items and examplesMethods

  21. CONSORT items and examplesMethods

  22. CONSORT items and examplesMethods Sample size 7a How sample size was determined 7b When applicable, explanation of any interim analyses and stopping guidelines

  23. CONSORT items and examplesMethods

  24. CONSORT items and examplesMethods Randomisation • Sequence generation 8a Method used to generate the random allocation sequence 8b Type of randomisation; details of any restriction (such as blocking and block size) • Allocation concealment mechanism 9 Mechanism used to implement the random allocation sequence (such as sequentially numbered containers), describing any steps taken to conceal the sequence until interventions were assigned

  25. CONSORT items and examplesMethods

  26. CONSORT items and examplesMethods

  27. CONSORT items and examplesMethods Randomisation • Implementation 10 Who generated the random allocation sequence, who enrolled participants, and who assigned participants to interventions Blinding 11a If done, who was blinded after assignment to interventions (for example, participants, care providers, those assessing outcomes) and how 11b If relevant, description of the similarity of interventions

  28. CONSORT items and examplesMethods

  29. CONSORT items and examplesMethods

  30. CONSORT items and examplesMethods Statistical methods 12a Statistical methods used to compare groups for primary and secondary outcomes 12b Methods for additional analyses, such as subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses

  31. CONSORT items and examplesMethods

  32. CONSORT items and examplesMethods

  33. CONSORT items and examplesResults Participant flow (a diagram is strongly recommended) 13a For each group, the numbers of participants who were randomly assigned, received intended treatment, and were analysed for the primary outcome 13b For each group, losses and exclusions after randomisation, together with reasons Recruitment 14a Dates defining the periods of recruitment and follow-up 14b Why the trial ended or was stopped

  34. CONSORT items and examplesResults

  35. CONSORT items and examplesResults

  36. CONSORT items and examplesResults Baseline data 15 A table showing baseline demographic and clinical characteristics for each group Numbers analysed 16 For each group, number of participants (denominator) included in each analysis and whether the analysis was by original assigned groups

  37. CONSORT items and examplesResults

  38. CONSORT items and examplesResults

  39. CONSORT items and examplesResults Outcomes and estimation 17a For each primary and secondary outcome, results for each group, and the estimated effect size and its precision (such as 95% confidence interval) 17b For binary outcomes, presentation of both absolute and relative effect sizes is recommended

  40. CONSORT items and examplesResults

  41. CONSORT items and examplesResults

  42. CONSORT items and examplesResults Ancillary analyses 18 Results of any other analyses performed, including subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses, distinguishing pre-specified from exploratory Harms 19 All important harms or unintended effects in each group (for specific guidance see CONSORT for harms

  43. CONSORT items and examplesResults

  44. CONSORT items and examplesResults

  45. CONSORT items and examplesDiscussion Limitations 20 Trial limitations, addressing sources of potential bias, imprecision, and, if relevant, multiplicity of analyses Generalisability 21 Generalisability (external validity, applicability) of the trial findings Interpretation 22 Interpretation consistent with results, balancing benefits and harms, and considering other relevant evidence

  46. CONSORT items and examplesDiscussion

  47. CONSORT items and examplesDiscussion

  48. CONSORT items and examplesDiscussion

  49. CONSORT items and examplesOther information Registration 23 Registration number and name of trial registry Protocol 24 Where the full trial protocol can be accessed, if available Funding 25 Sources of funding and other support (such as supply of drugs), role of funders

  50. CONSORT items and examplesOther information

More Related