1 / 35

Recent Remote Handling Experience at NuMI/ANU

Recent Remote Handling Experience at NuMI/ANU. NBI 2012 P. Hurh (FNAL). Nov. 10, 2012. Overview. Experiences over past 2 years (since last NBI) MiniBooNE NuMI Target Support NOvA Target Hall Re-configuration C-0 Remote Handling Facility Future Concerns Support of future experiments

aradia
Download Presentation

Recent Remote Handling Experience at NuMI/ANU

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Recent Remote Handling Experience at NuMI/ANU NBI 2012 P. Hurh (FNAL) Nov. 10, 2012

  2. Overview • Experiences over past 2 years (since last NBI) • MiniBooNE • NuMI Target Support • NOvA Target Hall Re-configuration • C-0 Remote Handling Facility • Future Concerns • Support of future experiments • Long Term Radioactive Storage and Disposal • Dose rate prediction tools

  3. Over past 2 years • MiniBooNE • Only maintenance and inspection activities • No Horn/target replacement needed for ~8 years • NuMI/MINOS • No Horn replacement needed • Many Target problems (J. Hylen’s earlier talk) • From the remote handling perspective: • Standard replacement procedures (5 replacements in 2 years was not standard!) • Specialized target autopsy tool successful

  4. Residual Radiation • Horns and Targets supported on the bottom of large shielding modules • Replaced in a simple work cell (no manipulators) where almost all activities take place above the module through holes using specialized tools • Radioactive components are transported in end-loaded casks using a system designed by Vladimir Sidorov Measured dose rates for NuMIHorn 1 water line repair (250 kW proton beam)

  5. NuMI Work Cell

  6. NuMI Target Hall

  7. NuMI Horn Transport Cask

  8. V. Sidorov’s Target Autopsy Tool • Similar to a tubing cutter:

  9. Target Cutting Tool Lined up to Target in NuMI Work Cell

  10. NuMI Target NT-05 Cut-Apart

  11. NOvA Target Hall Re-configuration • Change to Medium Energy Optics for NOvA requires moving the second horn location about 9 meters downstream • Target Chase area has been irradiated from many years of NuMI operation • Careful preparation and planning predicted total dose to worker of 2,495 mrem • Job was just completed in Sept-Oct 2012 with a measured dose of 1,538 mrem • Lead engineer: Salman Tariq

  12. NOvA Target Hall Re-configuration

  13. Clear out new location for Horn 2

  14. Lower shielding blocks handled remotely

  15. Storage for shield blocks

  16. Horn 2 carriage installed T-block kinematic mounts Temporary shielding to limit dose from upstream

  17. Horn 2 Lowered into carriage

  18. T-Block Installation

  19. Horn 2 installed (utilities yet to be connected)

  20. C-0 Remote Handling Facility • Needed to enable (while running beam): • Repairs • Autopsies • Volume reduction • Uses C-0 Detector AssyBldg(from canceled B-Tev project) • 10 m deep pit • Triple redundant sump system • Connected to Tevatron tunnel (future expansion opportunity?)

  21. C-0 Remote Handling Facility • Repair Cell • Approximately 6m x 7m (internal dimensions) • Internal overhead crane (10 ton) and jib crane (2 ton) • Re-furbished Lead Glass Window (PLUTO project- nuclear ramjet) • 1 new manipulator, 1 surplus manipulator • Large sliding steel doors • Storage Bays • 3 Large storage bays • End load design allows for shielded transfer • Lead Engineer: Vladimir Sidorov Lead Glass windows came from 1950’s era Project Pluto!

  22. C-0 Repair Cell

  23. C-0 RHF Storage Bays and Cask

  24. C-0 Repair Cell

  25. C-0 RHF Manipulators

  26. C-0 RHF Remote Handling TzarSidorov

  27. Future Concerns: Proposed Facilities • Near & Mid-Term • NOvA (50-400 R/hr) • Micro-BooNE (20-100 R/hr) • Mu2e (300,000 R/hr!!) • G-2 (12-60 R/hr) • ORKA? • NuSTORM? • Long Term (Project X) • Four simultaneous running target facilities at 1+ MW each!

  28. Project X Reference Design

  29. Project X Staging Layout

  30. Future Target Facilities • Impact: • Higher activity levels • Multiple locations on site • Increased frequency of handling • Requires: • More sophisticated equipment • More time for operations • More and better-trained staff • Better management of entire life cycle (LT storage and disposal)

  31. Long Term Storage and Shipment Facility • In order to handle the possibly hundreds of highly activated components from the rich Project X program, Fermilab is considering building a facility to: • Safely and securely hold radioactive items to decay • Volume reduce large radioactive items • Package decayed items for off-site disposal • Preliminary design features expandability to adapt to future needs

  32. LTSF – Conceptual Design Control Room Earth berm Expandable end wall Large Shielded Pit Work Cell Large Item Bays

  33. LTSF - Expanded

  34. Dose Rate Prediction Tools for Multiple Sources • What tools exist to predict dose rate at a point in space from multiple sources? • What can be developed? I v neutrinos

More Related