1 / 31

Translating Policy into Action Tools for Policy Design and Implementation

Translating Policy into Action Tools for Policy Design and Implementation. Professor liz o’sullivan – Lead instructor Dr. jafar javan – co instructor gn and Implementation. Discussion. Share your thoughts

arva
Download Presentation

Translating Policy into Action Tools for Policy Design and Implementation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Translating Policy into Action Tools for Policy Design and Implementation Professor liz o’sullivan – Lead instructor Dr. jafar javan – co instructor gn and Implementation

  2. Discussion • Share your thoughts • Should writing objectives with targets improve the policy process? Why, how or why not? • Should conducting a modified environmental scan improve the policy process? Why, how or why not?

  3. Today: 6 July • Implementing a policy – adapting SWOT & capacity assessment to • Assess policy’s compatibility with agency’s strengths & weaknesses • Assess unit ‘s capacity to implement the policy • Working with partners/strategic alliances • When partners are needed • Considering potential partners’ capacity • Characteristics of “good” & “bad” partnerships

  4. Today’s Roadmap • Where we are: • Have covered strategies (1) to determine that policy objective is feasible and will thrive in environment and (2) to solicit stakeholder feedback and engage them in the policy process • Where we want to go next • Identify appropriate agency(ies) {UN, NGO or others} to implement the policy • Strategies • Assess organizational capacity of implementing agency(ies)

  5. SWOT Analysis • Purpose • Assesses if objective is achievable given the policy environment • Pinpoints capacity of implementing organization(s) • The acronym • S=Strengths (implementer characteristics that will help achieve objective) • W=Weaknesses (implementer characteristics that will impede achieving objective) • O = Opportunity (supportive environment) • T = Threat (non-supportive or detrimental environment )

  6. Assessing Strengths & Weaknesses • How well the policy will fit into the agency • Will it be an attractive component within an agency? • Does the agency have a competitive advantage to administer the policy? {Remember this doesn’t have to be a UN agency}

  7. Policy’s attractiveness to the agency • Consistent with agency mission? • Consistent with employee skills? • Attractive to agency constituents? • How difficult will it be to abandon the policy?

  8. Discussion What characteristics do you see as providing a competitive advantage?

  9. Sources of competitive advantage • Logistic advantage, e.g., location or delivery system • Stakeholder loyalty • Track record in policy area or implementation strategy • Recognized for quality • Technical skills • Organizational/administrative skills • Financial resources • Local contacts

  10. Exercise • Purpose: To clarify what “sources of competitive advantage” refers to • The group members should • Consider each source of competitive advantage separately • Indicate if it is a source of strength or weakness in implementing the MDG • Briefly explain why it is a source of strength or weakness • Based on your discussion • What factors seem important in determining competitive advantage? • What factors may undermine successful implementation?

  11. Debriefing • Each group presents a summary of its discussion • Identify the MDG • For each source of competitive advantage describe the factors that determined if it was a source of strength or weakness • Discussion • How might an agency address its weaknesses • How might an agency take advantage of its strengths

  12. JAFER • How does this play into competitive advantage for the UN?

  13. Assessing Organizational Capacity • Drills down into what we learned about policy attractiveness and agency competitiveness • Focuses on capacity of administering unit • Having “wrong” unit responsible can render a policy ineffective • Considers capacity of potential partners • Do they complement the capacity of administering agency ? • Do they suggest challenges that will impede policy implementation?

  14. Capacity Assessment • UNDP Approach involves • Points of entry • Enabling environment • Organization • Individual • Core Issues • Functional Capacity & Capacity to Evaluate • Examine interaction of core issues & functional capacity at point of entry • Formal instruments & processes exist to measure capacity but • Process can be adapted to identify clear strengths and weaknesses at the unit and individual level

  15. Functional Capacities* • Engage stakeholders • Assess a situation & define mission • Formulate policies & strategies • Budget, management, & implement • Evaluate *Refer to UNDP Practice note p. 15

  16. Core Issues: Institutional Arrangements • Involve policies, procedures, and practices • Formal arrangements include statutes, regulations, and contracts • Informal arrangement include practices, norms, SOP [standard operating procedures] • Relevant entry points: environment & organization • Examples where institutional arrangements impact policy implementation? • In your experience which functional capacities are most relevant?

  17. Core Issues: Leadership • Components • Able to influence, inspire & motivate • Able to respond to change (internal & external) • Relevant entry points: environment & organization • Examples where leadership impacted policy implementation? • In your experience which functional capacities are most relevant?

  18. Core Issue: Knowledge • Information and technical skills • Most relevant point of entry: individual • Examples where knowledge impacted policy implementation? • In your experience which functional capacities are most relevant?

  19. Core Issue: Accountability • Ability to monitor, learn, self-regulate and adjust behavior • Relevant points of entry: organization and individual • Examples where accountability impacted policy implementation? • In your experience which functional capacities are most relevant?

  20. What it all means • Administering unit should have institutional arrangements, leadership, and knowledge to implement policy. • Unit should be able & willing to monitor the policy’s implementation, learn from the information, and adjust its behavior. • Unit should review capacity of potential partners prior to creating a close alliance, e.g., joint project

  21. Adopting a New Policy or Policy Direction • Considerations other than internal capacity • Are other organizations conducting similar programs? • If so, what are the implications? Partner? Leave it to them? Compete? • If not, is the need serious enough to undertake the costs? • What are the costs of entry or exit? • What will be impact on the public’s perception of the agency?

  22. Working with Other Agencies • Partners may be sought to compensate for weakness(es), take advantage of opportunities or respond to threats in the environment • Partners may be sought to (a) take advantage of resources e.g., volunteer pool, donor base, reputation, (b) form a solid political base, (c) develop relationships • Other reasons

  23. Partnerships/Collaborations/Strategic Alliances • A mutually beneficial and well-defined relationship entered into by • Two or more organizations to achieve common goals • Create a structure for decision making and shared responsibility

  24. Forms of inter-organizational relations • Sharing information or resources • Joint ventures • Single, discrete project • Task forces, steering committees • Strategic alliances/partnership/collaboration • Create a body to coordinate groups working together to achieve a common goal linked to their missions

  25. Exercise: Working with Other Organizations Purpose: To consider the value of assessing the capacity of potential partners Participants should consider their experiences in partnering with other organizations and consider • How valuable is (or would be) assessing the capacity of potential partners? • What capacities would you focus on? • Summarize your discussion to present to the classes

  26. Debriefing & Discussion • Each group presents the summary of its discussion • General discussion: Consider if and how assessing the capacity of potential partners can contribute to effective partnerships

  27. Three important elements to consider in creating a partnership • Trust among members [trust grows, initially calls for more detailed contracts] • Mutual benefits realized [otherwise why be involved] • Fair work allocation & reliable performance

  28. Barriers in partnerships • Turf issues • Mixed loyalties – coalition vs home organization • Lack of consistent leadership • Fundamental incompatibility • Especially different ways of doing business

  29. Lessons learned • We covered • Organizational capacity • SWOT • Developing partnerships • What lessons stand out?

  30. Looking forward to tomorrow • Building logic models and defining resources, activities, and outcomes • Developing relevant indicators • From model to pilot programs • The value and limitations of pilot programs • An example of taking a program from model to pilot to widespread implementation

  31. Readings for tomorrow • Skim Kellogg’s Logic Model Development Guide chapters 1, 2 & 4. We will use specific sections during the class • Sanderson’s observations about pilot programs will be summarized • Portions of Olds’ study on nurse-family partnership will be summarized

More Related