1 / 17

Common Spatial Development Document of V4+2 Countries Ing. arch. Martin Tunka, CSc.

Common Spatial Development Document of V4+2 Countries Ing. arch. Martin Tunka, CSc. ESPON 2013 Programme Open Seminar 3-4 June 2009, Prague. Reasons Diferent spatial development documents on state level Various forms , contents , structure – large variety, diversity

ave
Download Presentation

Common Spatial Development Document of V4+2 Countries Ing. arch. Martin Tunka, CSc.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CommonSpatialDevelopmentDocumentof V4+2 Countries Ing. arch. Martin Tunka, CSc. ESPON 2013 Programme Open Seminar3-4 June 2009, Prague

  2. Reasons • Diferentspatialdevelopmentdocuments on statelevel • Variousforms, contents, structure – large variety, diversity • Questionofcross-border relations, mutualties – problemofinterpretation • „LOST IN TRANSLATION“ • Do weneed to take a „commonviewofan area“ and „findcommonspeech“? • What to pursue, howandwhat to express ?

  3. Workingobjectives • Thedocumentdealswith: • delineationofdevelopmentareasanddevelopmentaxesof a transnationalimportance • delineationof transport corridorsof a transnationalimportance • Aimsofthedocument: to express in a unifiedwayboththematicspheres (developmentareasandaxesand transport corridorsof a transnationalimprotance) withintheinvestigated area, whereasthematerialwillcomprisethe part describingthestate, sotheproposed/suggested part

  4. Working proceedings V4: • BEGINNING – March 2008, meeting in Bratislava • Steering group (ministries) • May 2008, meeting of Steering group in Brno

  5. V4+2: • June 2008, Ministerial meeting in Prague, CzechRepublic Conlusions (Article 8): „ We recognize the importance of spatial planning in strengtheningterritorialcohesion and are committed to elaborate a common document on spatial development of the Visegrad group countries, which also includes Bulgaria and Romania and which may be extended to other neighbouring Member States in the future.“

  6. V4+2: • October 2008, meeting of Steering group in Budapest • Working group (compilers) • June/July 2009 ?, meeting of Steering group in Warsaw • Finalization: end of the 2009 or spring 2010 ?

  7. Delineation of development areas and development axes of a t. i. • Respects the development areas and development axes as they are defined in the national spatial development documents of individual countries • Takes over from them all or selectively some parts • Interprets them jointly within the whole investigated area • Identifies no-continuations • Suggests changes and/or supplements of development axes

  8. Development areas and develop. axes of a t. i.

  9. Delineation of transport corridors of a t. i. • Railways, roads, inland water ways, airports • Takes over the corridors from: - agreements (paneuropean multimodal transport corridors, TEN-T, EEC UNO – AGC, AGTC, AGR, AGN) - other documents (e. g. national high speed lines networks, and others) • Identifies no-continuations • Suggests changes and/or supplements

  10. Railway corridors of a transnational importance

  11. Road corridors of a transnational importance

  12. Airports and inland waterway corridors of a t. i.

  13. European context

  14. Glossary • Glossaryofterms • Presentation of the system of territorial development and spatial planning including relations to transport networksofindividualcountries

  15. Politicalobjectives Thedocumentcouldbeusedfor: • Updatingofthenationalspatialdevelopmentdocuments • Working on EU and on V4+2 level • Debate about spatial developmentandcohesion policy • Implementation - Territorial Agenda of the EU and 1AP • Updatingofthe TEN-T • UpdatingofthedocumentStateandperspectivesofterritoryofthe EU

  16. Secondphase - vision • Collaboration in thefieldoftheregionaldevelopment (7 proposedthemes): • Eliminatingregionaldifferences, regionaldisparities, potentialsofconvergence in V4+2 space • Regionalstructure, settlement structure, polycentricityoftheterritory • Demographicchallenges in spatialandurbandevelopment • Accessibility – transport corridors • Territorialimpactsofclimatechange, naturalresources • Nationalpolicy, elaborationandsynthesisofplans • Settinguptheongoing co-operationplatform

  17. Thankyouforyourattention Martin.Tunka@mmr.cz Ministry forRegionalDevelopment oftheCzechRepublic Staroměstské nám. 6 110 15 Praha 1 www.mmr.cz

More Related