1 / 18

Choices and regrets in children’s counterfactual thinking

Choices and regrets in children’s counterfactual thinking. Sarah Beck University of Birmingham Patrick Burns, Kevin Riggs, Daniel Weisberg. Counterfactual thinking. ‘If only I had left the house earlier, I would have caught the train...’ ‘I should have set an alarm’ ‘I almost made it’

betsy
Download Presentation

Choices and regrets in children’s counterfactual thinking

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Choices and regrets in children’s counterfactual thinking Sarah Beck University of Birmingham Patrick Burns, Kevin Riggs, Daniel Weisberg

  2. Counterfactual thinking • ‘If only I had left the house earlier, I would have caught the train...’ • ‘I should have set an alarm’ • ‘I almost made it’ • Experience of regret

  3. Why look at development? • What are children’s capacities? • Understanding the process of counterfactual thinking can be easier in earlier stages of a developing system • Include more ‘indirect’ measures to tap children’s abilities (difficulties with formal language might be avoided in behavioural tasks?)

  4. Children’s counterfactual thinking and emotions Development of counterfactual thinking • 3-4 shift (Harris et al, 1996; Riggs et al, 1998) • Later developments: • Complex conditionals: Rafetseder, Cristi-Vargas, Perner, 2010 • ‘What else could have happened?’ Beck et al, 2006 • Almosts (Harris, 1997, Beck & Guthrie, in press) Development of counterfactual emotions • 7 yr olds understand regret, Guttentag & Ferrell, 2004 • experience regret, • Amsel & Smalley, 2000 • 5-6 yrs Weisberg & Beck, 2010 • 6-7 yrs O’Connor et al, under sub • 10-11yrs Rafetseder & Perner, under sub

  5. Why look at counterfactual emotions? • Cognition and emotion • Function of counterfactual thinking (e.g. Roese, 1997) • Why is there a developmental lag (if there is one)? • Spontaneity? • Domain general constraints (EF)? • Are we really measuring regret?

  6. Experiencing Counterfactual Emotions • Simplified CFE game • Choose between 2 boxes • See contents of chosen box • Rate happiness on scale • See unchosen contents • Re-rate happiness with your box • Regret and Relief trials • 11 5-6, 10 6-7, 10 7-8, 12 adults Chosen: 2 stickers Unchosen: 8 stickers (regret) OR empty (relief) Weisberg & Beck, 2010, JECP

  7. Experiencing Counterfactual Emotions • Difference score (first – second rating) • -ve = regret, +ve = relief • All groups showed regret, and no differences between groups • Only 7-8 year olds and adults experienced relief Weisberg & Beck, 2010, JECP

  8. Methodological problems • The scale • Difficult to show relief if you are happy winning first sticker • Sensitivity? • Is this a result of double questioning? • Rafetseder & Perner (under submission).

  9. Improvements to method:New rating scale • Children chose between two cards: win/lose tokens • Regret-Win trials (Win 2/3, could have won 8)Regret-Lose trials (Lost 2/3, could have won 3) • Relief-Win trials (Win 2/3, could have lost 3)Relief-Lose trials (Lost 2/3, could have lost 8)

  10. Results • Age 4-5, n = 55, m = 5;1, r = 4;8 – 5;7, 29 males • Age 5-6, n = 52, m = 6;2, r = 5;8 – 6;7, 27 males • Age 6-7, n = 55, m = 7;3, r = 6;8 – 7;8, 31 males Regret-Win trials (Win 2/3, could have won 8) – Experienced at 5, p = .001Regret-Lose trials (Lost 2/3, could have won 3) – Experienced at 5, p < .001 Relief-Win trials (Win 2/3, could have lost 3) – Experienced at 5, p < .001Relief-Lose trials (Lost 2/3, could have lost 8) – Experienced at 7, p = .010 Weisberg & Beck, under submission

  11. Are these really counterfactual emotions? • Do children need to do cf thinking to ‘pass’ our boxes task? • Choose between 2 boxes • See contents of chosen box • Rate happiness on scale • See unchosen contents • Re-rate happiness with your box “I should have picked the other box” Counterfactual “I don’t have those 8 stickers” Frustration Weisberg & Beck, in prep.

  12. Are these really counterfactual emotions? • “I should have picked the other box” (counterfactual) • OR “I don’t have those 8 stickers” (frustration) • Adult literature suggests that feeling of responsibility increases likelihood of regret (Byrne, 2002; Roese & Olson, 1995; Zeelenberg et al, 1998) • Correlation between life regrets and responsibility (Zeelenberg et al, 1998)

  13. Adults making ‘choices’ • Is there really a ‘choice’ in the boxes game? • Illusion of control (Langer 1975....) • People who chose a lottery ticket (based on a picture ) compared to those allocated ticket: • Less likely to resell • Value their ticket more • Even though the decision is arbitrary their judgments are influenced by the apparent ‘choice’

  14. Choice, Chance and regret • Children played the boxes game in one of three conditions: • Choose which box you win • Experimenter rolls die to determine which box • Child rolls die to determine which box • If children are simply frustrated, this manipulation shouldn’t affect them • If they are thinking counterfactually, more ‘regret’ in choice condition. Weisberg & Beck, under sub.

  15. Choice/Chance experiment • 5-6yrs N = 101 • 6-7yrs N = 94 • 7-8yrs N = 102

  16. Choice, chance and regret • All three conditions differ from each other on both CFE • Regret/relief only differ in the choice condition • Children’s ratings at all ages are influenced by choice manipulation • Evidence for counterfactual emotions (in choice) Weisberg & Beck, in prep.

  17. The child throws condition • Don’t realise it’s chance – illusion of control • if IoC might predict a difference between relief and regret trials. • Do realise it’s chance but still some opportunity for counterfactual emotions? • Adults show counterfactual emotions under some chance events (e.g. Imagine being allocated lottery ticket 245 when 246 wins?)

  18. Choice and Chance in regret • Choice experiment finds evidence for change in emotion in 5-7 year olds when they make a choice about the outcome (to some extent when involved) • But not when outcome is determined by chance • Double-questioning can’t be the only problem • Indirect measures of counterfactual thought • Counterfactual emotions develop in middle childhood – involve something more than being able to answer simple conditional questions.

More Related