1 / 7

APPENDIX A Part of Solidarity’s submission to NERSA on the issue of Eskom’s proposed MYPD2

APPENDIX A Part of Solidarity’s submission to NERSA on the issue of Eskom’s proposed MYPD2 Municipal electricity redistributors’ price increases. APPENDIX A – Municipal tariff increases. APPENDIX A – Municipal tariff increases. APPENDIX A – Municipal tariff increases.

blaine
Download Presentation

APPENDIX A Part of Solidarity’s submission to NERSA on the issue of Eskom’s proposed MYPD2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. APPENDIX A Part of Solidarity’s submission to NERSA on the issue of Eskom’s proposed MYPD2 Municipal electricity redistributors’ price increases

  2. APPENDIX A – Municipal tariff increases

  3. APPENDIX A – Municipal tariff increases

  4. APPENDIX A – Municipal tariff increases

  5. APPENDIX A – Municipal tariff increases

  6. APPENDIX A – Municipal tariff increases

  7. APPENDIX A – Municipal tariff increases If the three different approaches are considered cumulatively over the three year period that Eskom’s MYPD2 covers, the following emerges: Between the range of an original municipal gross profit margin of 50% and 130%, the respective cumulative increases over the three year period range from 97,4% to 63,5% for example 2 and from 106% to 78,2% for example 3. Instead of the price of electricity for customers of municipalities more than doubling over the next three years, the cumulative increase could be kept much lower than the current method’s 146% while still allowing municipalities an 8% increase in gross profit each year to compensate for possible increases in the cost of distribution. In none of the examples is Eskom’s flow of revenue or tariff increases affected – the changes are merely made at municipal level.

More Related