1 / 28

Fire Safety Engineering & Structures in Fire

Fire Safety Engineering & Structures in Fire. History of Fire Safety Engineering Session JT1. Workshop at Indian Institute of Science 9-13 August, 2010 Bangalore India. Prescripción. Codes and standards are an attempt to achieve a minimum level of safety

braden
Download Presentation

Fire Safety Engineering & Structures in Fire

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fire Safety Engineering & Structures in Fire History of Fire Safety Engineering Session JT1 Workshop at Indian Institute of Science 9-13 August, 2010 Bangalore India

  2. Prescripción • Codes and standards are an attempt to achieve a minimum level of safety • They establish generalized rules that enable handling infrastructure in an homogeneous manner • They are not intended to solve individual problems

  3. What buildings do Codes Describe? • How are these codes used? • Who is competent to use these codes? • Is there an alternative to codes & standards?

  4. History • To understand the practise of Fire Safety Engineering it is essential to understand its history

  5. Fire Safety Strategy • Main Concepts have not changed • Life Safety • Egress Strategy • Design of Egress paths • Detection and Alarm • Signalling • Structural Requirements • Compartmentation - deformations • Structural strength • Redundancy • Fire Suppression and control

  6. The Origins • Regulations and Fire Service are born after the great fires of New York (1835), London (1861), Chicago (1871), Boston (1872) and San Francisco (1906). • Rules stem from the experience of fire fighters, architects and engineers • Very poor understanding of human behaviour, fire dynamics and structural behaviour

  7. 1850-1940 • Building Separation Distances • Compartimentation • Size and separation of windows • Maximum Egress distances • Sprinklers • Passive fire protection – fire proofing • 1st Professional Fire Brigade – James Braidwood (1824)

  8. Standard Fire (1906) • Compartment Fire (4 m x 4 m x 4 m) • Variable Ventilation & Fuel Load Structural Element Critical Temperature Rating

  9. Aims • Worst Case Scenario • Curve is defined by an envelope to all fires • Rating is defined by total fuel consumption Increase of Fuel Load

  10. Why the large safety factors? • Poor understanding of material behaviour at high temperatures • Poor understanding of fire dynamics • Poor fire fighting technology • Codes & Standards represent societies responsibility to guarantee safety – i.e. Large Safety Factors!

  11. The Advantage of Codes & Standards • Codes and Standards gave structural engineers the freedom to build extraordinary buildings – Codes & standards represent an opportunity for innovation! • Structural engineers transformed cities!

  12. 2nd World War • Great technological innovation in our understanding of “Fire” and its “Consequences” • BRE, NBS, Harvard, MIT, Tokyo, etc. • Codes & Standards take the lead over innovation in construction- codes & standards encourage innovation

  13. When Codes are Ahead • Most buildings fall within the domain of Codes & Standards • To apply Codes & Standards it is necessary to understand them and have experience with them – an apprenticeship! • Engineering is subordinated to Codes & Standards

  14. 1950-1970 • City density increases • Building complexity increases • Codes & standards fall behind!

  15. Great Fires of the 1960’s • Problems with smoke management • Problems with materials selection • Structural problems • Complexity exceeds knowledge • Codes & standards generate a false sense of safety • Codes & standards become a barrier to innovation for an uncertain gain in safety

  16. When Codes are Behind • Most buildings fall outside the range of applicability of codes & standards • Those who apply the codes & standards have to use them as a tool, understand their limitations, know when to depart from them and when to supplement them • Codes and standards are subordinated to engineering

  17. The Answer • Understanding the Problem - America Burning, UK Building Fire Act, etc. • US$100’s of millions on research investments • NIST, FRS, CSIRO, NBR, VTT, SP, SINTEF, vfdb, CSTB, etc. • New methodologies for fire dynamics (zone models, empirical corelations, CFD models, etc.) • New material flammability screening methods (LIFT, cone calorimeter, etc.) • Deeper understanding of human behaviour in fire (egress models, etc.) • Higher Education programmes • We learn to calculate!

  18. El Resultado • Recognition of our engineering competence • Codes evolve • Fire Safety Engineering appears as recognized profession • Performance Based Design

  19. Structural Fire Engineering • The Ove Arup Philosophy enters Fire Safety Engineering – Codes & Engineering as a tool in communion with Architecture • Standard Fire – recognition of limitations and safety factors • Fire proofing is only “a” solution • Structural behaviour is part of a fire strategy – trade-offs & compensations • It is the “design” and not the “material”

  20. Cardington -1990’s • Definition of space is more important than material selection

  21. Reinforcement Temperature [oC] Failure (1 hour rating) 2 hr 3 hr Failure (3 hour rating) Time ↑ 1 hr 550 Failure (2 hour rating) TReinforcement 20 TGas Time [hours] Insulation Temperature [oC] Beam 1 hr 2 hr 3 hr TGas 550 TBeam 20 TGas Time [hours] Insulation The Structural Analysis (2000’s) • Detailed understanding of structural behaviour in fire • Steel vs Concrete • Error Bars vs Refined Calculations

  22. Temperature [oC] Beam 1 hr 2 hr 3 hr TGas 550 TBeam 20 TGas Time [hours] Insulation Structural Analysis

  23. Reinforcement Temperature [oC] Failure (1 hour rating) 2 hr 3 hr Failure (3 hour rating) Time ↑ 1 hr 550 Failure (2 hour rating) TReinforcement 20 TGas Time [hours] Insulation Structural Analysis

  24. The Analysis of the Fire (2000’s) • The Standard Fire: Does not represent heat transfer to a structure – only a standardized screening method • Parametric T vs t curves only useful when analyzing small cubic compartments (4 m x 4 m x 4 m) – Require a correct heat transfer analysis • When do we need to do Computational Fluid Dynamics?

  25. Codes & Standards (2000’s) • Limited to conventional infrastructure • Conventional is everyday less frequent • Innovation in Construction has advanced much faster than fire safety codes & standards (construction methods, size, complexity, technology, materials, etc.) • Innovation has advanced much faster than our capability to educate engineers to be able to use codes & standards as engineering tools • Codes & Standards still give us a “false” sense of safety, thus hamper investment in innovation – we still do not know what we do not know!

  26. Investment in Knowledge – 1970’s Results • Codes, Standards & Engineering supporting Architectural Design • Novel Designs could be constructed • Beaubourg is to Fire Safety Engineering what the Sydney Opera House is to Structural Engineering • Demonstration of Performance – Quantifying Safety • Reduction of Uncertainty • Cost Reduction • Elimination of Unnecessary Protection – False sense of safety • Optimization

  27. Where are we now? • Codes & Standards are a true obstacle to innovation • Not a criticism to the codes but to the lack of knowledge of those who use them • In the evolution cycle prescription is today subordinated to engineering • We need engineers not apprentices • We are not educating those engineers

More Related