1 / 11

Closed Orbit Feedback and Tune Measurement: Status of realization at SIS18

Closed Orbit Feedback and Tune Measurement: Status of realization at SIS18. P. Forck, P. Kowina, M. Schwickert, R. Singh for the GSI Beam Diagnostics Group and DELTA (TU-Dortmund) 5th FAIR Machine Advisory Committee Meeting May 9th/10th 2011. Overview. Outline

carltons
Download Presentation

Closed Orbit Feedback and Tune Measurement: Status of realization at SIS18

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Closed Orbit Feedback and Tune Measurement: Status of realization at SIS18 P. Forck, P. Kowina, M. Schwickert, R. Singh for the GSI Beam Diagnostics Group and DELTA (TU-Dortmund) 5th FAIR Machine Advisory Committee Meeting May 9th/10th 2011

  2. Overview Outline • Status of Closed Orbit Feedback for SIS18 performed in collaboration with DELTA (TU-Dortmund) & COSY (FZ-Jülich) • Status of Tune Measurement System at SIS18 The BPM signals are digitized by the I-Tech LIBERA Digitalization Units SIS18 serves as a test installation for FAIR: • Validation the general design consideration • Preparation of final realization for FAIR • Gain of operational experiences

  3. Digital BPM Readout: Digitalization and Evaluation System Description: • Digitalization of BPM signals at LIBERA with 14 bit and 125 MS/s ADC • Individual bunch position evaluation with FPGA (presently Virtex-II Pro) • Monitoring: data transfer to PC for either further down conversion for CO or bunch by bunch evaluation e.g. tune • Planned Closed Orbit Feedback (COFB): Digital Down Conversion on LIBERA, Real-time transfer to concentrator via Diamond Com. Controller (DCC) Advantage: Single bunch position for flexible further processing For FAIR: Comparable successor system Scalable software realized at SIS18 Integration & Δ/delivers bunch position I-Tech LIBERA Hadron

  4. Closed Orbit Feedback at SIS18: Hardware for BPM Data System Description COFB: • Position data reduction on LIBERA • 10 kHz input to ‘BPM Extender’ • Input of time-dependent (triplett  duplett) Orbit Response Matrix from Control System • SVD Algorithm for correction calculation • Digital output to corrector power converter with  1kHz (to be tested) Beam DCC over SFP Corrector Hardware: Design & test by TU-Dortmund

  5. Closed Orbit Feedback at SIS18: Hardware for Power Converter Multi Function Unit designed by GSI EET Group System Description PS control: • Multi Function Unit (MFU) as standard for all PS at FAIR (10 kHz digital bandwidth, 32 bit DAC) • Input from BPM-Extender via USB  Quasi real-time communication for corrector value, bandwidth > 1 kHz • Installation of MFU-control for SIS18 correctors required (foreseen end 2011) First tests for communication performed SIS18: 12 BPMs and 12 hor. & vert. correctors SIS100: 84 BPMs and 84 hor. & vert. correctors

  6. Closed Orbit Feedback at SIS18: Status General: System design according to Synchrotron Light Source standards Implementation at DELTA (TU-Dortmund): summer 2011 • Readout of 54 BPMs and control of 20 hor. & vert. correctors • Reaction bandwidth: 0.3 to 1 kHz (projected) About 1 year delay due to severe illness of PhD student at TU-Dortmund ! Implementation at SIS18: Foreseen in 2012 12 BPMs and 12 hor.& vert. correctors, projected reaction bandwidth 1 kHz • Ongoing: Input of time-dependent Orbit Response Matrix via Control System • Ongoing: Digital interface to power converter controller MFU Design for SIS100: 84 BPMs will be installed and 84 correctors  data treatment can be scaled Constant lattice  time-independent Orbit Response Matrix Hierarchical scheme for CO stabilization: 1. Magnetic field control by reference dipole  correction of e.g. hysteresis 2. Feed-forward using position data for creation of new set-values  correction of reproducible errors 3. Real-time feedback  residual, non-reproducible errors on 10 ms time scale

  7. Tune Determination at SIS18: Hardware The beam is excited to betatron oscillation → the beam position is measured each revolution (’turn-by-turn’) → Fourier Transformation gives the non-integer tune q. • Advantage of digital processing: • Digital bunch identification for turn-by-turn evaluation • Varying revolution frequency: Matched ‘filter’ due to individual bunch integration  Precise determination of bunch position required for low excitation

  8. Tune at fixed time Maximum Position Variation 5 mm horizontal horizontal vertical vertical 2 mm Tune versus time Working Diagram vertical horizontal Qy  0.02 Qx  0.015 Tune Determination at SIS18: Online Display of Results Online display for tune measurement: Time resolution for plot: 4096 turns  20 – 4.5 ms Features: • Minor emittance growth but good signal-to-noise • Online display • Ready for users • DAQ in FESA • GUI according FAIR spec. Ongoing: Improvement of algorithm Tune variation due to triplett  duplett lattice Beam parameter: Ar18+ acc. 11  300 MeV/u within 0.7 s

  9. Turns x 1000 Tune Determination at SIS18: Exploration of Working Range Condition for ‘Working Range’: Sufficient signal strength & minor emittance growth Orbit and tune for 3.5 W exciter power (50mW/Hz) Vertical Beam parameter: 6·109Ar18+, 11  300 MeV/u within 0.4 s, Measurement parameter: Vertical excitation only, 516 turn FFT

  10. Tune Determination at SIS18: Exploration of Working Range Condition for ‘Working Range’: Sufficient signal strength & minor emittance growth Result: • Measurement without significant emitance growth Transverse profile by an Ionization Profile Monitor Beam parameter: 6·109Ar18+, 11  300 MeV/u within 0.4 s, Measurement parameter: Vertical excitation only, 516 turn FFT

  11. Conclusion Tune measurement system for SIS18: • ‘Oversampling’ of bunches with 125 MSa/s > 20 · frf • One position value per bunch by integration  cuf-off low-frequency noise • Calculation of FFT  flexible time resolution e.g. 512 turns  1 ms • Resolution Δq << 0.01 i.e. better than specified (spectrum broadening by tune spread contribution, to be investigated) • Working range determined, no significant transverse emittance growth or beam loss • Tests of ‘BBQ’ analog system: at SIS18 low-frequency noise is an issue • Tune measurement: Demonstrated for SIS18, system design suited for SIS100 • Tune feedback: Detailed consideration not started (CO stabilization as precaution) Possible solutions: Hardware comparable to COFB or ‘PLL tune tracking’ Closed Orbit Feedback: • Anticipated bandwidth: 1 kHz • Electronics realization comparable to Synchrotron Light Sources • Collaboration with TU-Dortmund  demonstration expected late 2011 FAIR: Comparable systems will be installed.

More Related