1 / 36

35 Leroy Avenue

35 Leroy Avenue. Public Use Assessment Evonne Klein, First Selectwoman David Bayne Seth Morton Linda Santarella Callie Sullivan Karl Kilduff, Administrative Officer. September 2, 2008. Community Feedback. Community Feedback. Preserve the current building

Download Presentation

35 Leroy Avenue

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 35 Leroy Avenue Public Use Assessment Evonne Klein, First Selectwoman David Bayne Seth Morton Linda Santarella Callie Sullivan Karl Kilduff, Administrative Officer September 2, 2008

  2. Community Feedback

  3. Community Feedback • Preserve the current building • Build upscale senior housing • Build Affordable Housing • Relocate the Senior Center • Convert to a Community Center • Study Further Alternatives • Consider Republican Club survey results • Study the site to determine best use • Concern about future tax increases • Sell the site

  4. Board of Selectmen Priorities 2008 • Open & Community Space • Traffic & Transportation • Downtown & Business Development • Housing • Technology

  5. Concept of Public Uses • Only public uses were considered for the site • Why? Municipalities typically purchase land for a public benefit • A public use results in some public advantage, benefit or enhancement of public welfare • The private sector should build upscale housing • Sale of the property at this point delivers no real public benefit • Historically, Darien has not bought land for a commercial use

  6. Public Uses Include: Infrastructure Parking Pump Station Bridge/Road Quality of Life Park Municipal Need Town Facilities Program Needs Community Programs Senior Programs Public Benefit Affordable Housing Public Uses

  7. PROS Fulfill demand for more active recreation Provide passive recreation opportunity Create green space in the Downtown CONS Intermittent traffic impact to neighborhood depending on active recreation schedule Need for capital funds to grade site and construct facilities Increase in operating funds for new park maintenance Assess impact to investments made at Tilley Pond Parcel configuration limits type of recreation No demand for passive recreation Create a Park Scope: Demolish library building to create park land.

  8. POSSIBLE COSTS Need to pay for demolition Estimated at $600,000 for hazmat and demo Need to pay for site preparation and appropriate facilities Could be over $1,000,000 Need to pay for increased maintenance costs with 0.5 FTE QUESTIONS Is 1.993 acres of parkland a good investment at over $5.8 million? Create a Park

  9. PROS Site is as close to Darien Train Station as furthest end of Leroy West Lot Close proximity to Downtown for additional customer and/or employee parking Reduce parking permit demand Provide added off-street parking in the Downtown 130 possible spaces – Leroy wait list over 1,000 CONS Need additional capital funds for demolition and lot preparation. Traffic impacts to neighborhood May need to run a shuttle service to better connect parking to the train station and other lots Increased permit revenue of $37,000 does not cover added operating expenses Create a Parking Lot Scope: Demolish building, re-grade site to create surface parking.

  10. POSSIBLE COSTS Need to pay for demolition Estimated at $600,000 for hazmat and demo Need to pay for site preparation and lot expansion Could be over $300,000 Need to pay $42,000 for shuttle service operating expenses Need to pay $20,000 for other operating expenses QUESTIONS Is over $5.1 million a good expenditure to fulfill part of the in-town parking demand OR Is over $5.1 million a good expenditure to address 12% of the Darien waiting list? Create a Parking Lot

  11. PROS Site is as close to Darien Train Station as furthest end of Leroy West Lot Close proximity to Downtown for additional customer and/or employee parking Large increase in parking capacity (3 levels = 300 spaces) Reduce parking permit demand Provide added off-street parking in the Downtown Possibility to generate revenue for the Parking Fund CONS Need additional capital funds for demolition and to construct garage Need zoning regulation change and develop community design standards to support structure Traffic impacts to neighborhood Garage operations require more operating support through staff which is not covered by increased revenue May need to run a shuttle service to better connect parking to the train station and other lots Create a Parking Garage Scope: Demolish building and build a parking garage.

  12. POSSIBLE COSTS Need to pay for demolition Estimated at $600,000 for hazmat and demo Need to pay for site preparation and parking deck construction Could be over $3,000,000 Need to pay $42,000 for shuttle service operating expenses Need to pay $52,000 for garage operations QUESTIONS Is over $7.7 million a good expenditure to provide more parking and reduce the Darien wait list by less than one-third? Create a Parking Garage

  13. PROS Provide additional room in Town Hall for meeting space, expand existing Town Hall offices, and increase available storage space CONS Need additional capital funds for rehab of interior of Library Need additional capital funds to rehab old space in Town Hall Increase in operating expenses for heating/cooling and electricity Must conduct office space needs assessment to select appropriate offices to be moved off-site Possible efficiency loss with de-centralization of offices and services Move Town Hall Offices Scope: Rehabilitate interior and retrofit to house certain Town offices.

  14. POSSIBLE COSTS Need to pay for rehab of space Could be over $2,000,000 Need to pay for rehab of Town Hall space Could be over $1,000,000 Need to pay for increased operating expenses estimated at $80,000 QUESTIONS Is more town office space worth over $7.2 million and increased annual operating expenses? Move Town Hall Offices

  15. PROS Provide new location for Senior Center Preserve the current building Floor plan can work with current Senior program CONS Need additional capital funds for rehab of interior of Library Need additional capital funds to demolish at Edgerton Increase in operating expenses for heating/cooling and electricity for larger space No ability to expand program beyond existing footprint Does not complement BoS vision for future of senior programming Move Senior Center Scope: Rehabilitate interior and retrofit to accommodate the current Senior Center program.

  16. POSSIBLE COSTS Need to pay for rehab of space Could be over $2,000,000 Need to pay for demo at Edgerton Could be over $150,000 Need to pay for additional operating expenses over current estimated at $30,000 QUESTIONS Is $6.3 million a good investment in a Senior Center that cannot be expanded over other options? Move Senior Center

  17. PROS Community meeting space New venue for recreation programs for all ages CONS Need additional capital funds for rehab of interior of Library Increase in operating expenses for heating/cooling and electricity Operations model needs to be determined – how will it operate and how will it be funded No vision or identified demand to support an independent center No ability to expand Insufficient parking Build a Community Center Scope: Rehabilitate interior and retrofit to house a community center.

  18. POSSIBLE COSTS Need to pay for rehab of space Could be over $2,000,000 Need to pay equipment and resources to support a determined program ??????? Need to pay for increased operating expenses estimated at $100,000 QUESTIONS What is the program and demand for a Community Center to warrant over $6.5 million? Build a Community Center

  19. PROS Provides housing to keep Senior residents in Darien Provide housing for local workforce Area identified for increased density/housing in Town Plan Helps meet target to achieve a moratorium in short-term Helps town take local control of development Studies identified site as being ideal for affordable housing because near transit and jobs No additional project cost to Town CONS Moratorium provides limited relief from 8-30g Added units small compared to 10% needed to be exempt from 8-30g Limits Town’s flexibility to use site for other purposes into the future Affordable Housing Scope: Issue request for development proposals for construction of affordable housing on site with land lease from the Town. To follow Clock Hill model.

  20. Cost/Benefit Assessment • What uses at 35 Leroy will address the greatest need in Darien? • Municipal needs should be the focus in assessing uses rather than the possibility of what could be done with a physical structure • Needs identified by the Board of Selectmen Priorities: • Affordable Housing • Parking • Senior programs

  21. Cost/Benefit Considerations • Any use is impacted by $4.125 million purchase price. • The purchase price may impact the fiscal feasibility and/or desirability of certain activities on the site • Additional capital funds may be required in the short-term or future budgets to support certain activities • Options that involve the Town operating the building will carry additional operating costs – costs will vary depending on the services delivered • Detailed cost estimates are unknown for certain programs without architectural services

  22. Cost/Benefit Considerations • All options must also carry the cost to abate hazardous materials on the site. • Removal of asbestos estimated at $300,000 in 2007. • Asbestos must be removed prior to demolition of building or if rehab work disturbs the current encapsulation

  23. Cost/Benefit Considerations • Failure to make a timely decision regarding the use of the property will necessitate budgeting additional operating costs for a vacant building • Town still needs to provide minimal utilities and maintain the asset • A highly visible property will be clearly vacant • Risk of continued 8-30g applications in single-family, residential neighborhoods

  24. Deciding Factors

  25. Meet Selectmen’s Priorities

  26. Concur with Town Plan

  27. Character of the Neighborhood

  28. Re-use of Library Building * Town can require adaptive re-use of building like other towns have done with schools.

  29. Additional Costs to Town

  30. Deciding Factors Highlighted factors are positive

  31. Parking • Use of 35 Leroy for parking fulfills an identified need • Such use is undesirable for many reasons including: • Added revenue will not cover all costs and require a tax dollar subsidy • Limited number of spaces created result in a low return on investment for building • Significant negative impact to neighborhood • Parking garage would have a significant impact on the character of the community

  32. Senior CenterCommunity Center • Program requirements and needs drive the facility specifications • Program as driver. Build a space around program requirements so needs are primary and future needs are considered • Architecture as driver. Use an available space and program requirements (current and future) are secondary • The ability to address future program needs will be limited by the current building

  33. Senior CenterCommunity Center • Re-use of the building for Senior Center or Community Center does not complement the Board of Selectmen’s vision for a Darien Community Activity Center • The Darien Community Activity Center would strive to meet the program needs of Seniors, the arts and the community in a comprehensive facility • Best-practices for new Senior programs mix ages and activities • Senior programs must innovate to thrive • Edgerton could serve this need as the site

  34. Affordable Housing • Housing at 35 Leroy responds to community feedback regarding: • Need for affordable housing • Provide an opportunity for the Town to exercise local control over development and preserve neighborhoods • Concern over future budget increases • Town is not building units • Town is not maintaining units • Re-use of the current building • The Request for Development Proposals identified adaptive re-use as a preference

  35. Affordable Housing • Housing at 35 Leroy responds to: • Identified need in Darien for affordable housing • Goals encouraged by 8-30g • Presents an opportunity to move toward a moratorium • Board of Selectmen Priorities • Recommendations for affordable housing in the Town Plan of Conservation and Development, SWRPA Regional Housing Assessment, PZC Affordable Housing Sub-Committee Report, and DAHAC Final Report

  36. Next Steps • Establish an Advisory Committee to work with the Board of Selectmen by reviewing and ranking proposals • Board of Selectmen to act on recommendation of Advisory Committee

More Related