1 / 41

Prince (1981): Givenness !

Prince (1981): Givenness !. Questions? Tylers at Stanford dot edu. Big themes. Watch out when people talk about given/new—there are all sorts of definitions out there for these.

ciara
Download Presentation

Prince (1981): Givenness !

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Prince (1981): Givenness! Questions? Tylers at Stanford dot edu

  2. Big themes • Watch out when people talk about given/new—there are all sorts of definitions out there for these. • Prince says: Let’s get rid of shared knowledge and givennessand talk about a hierarchy of assumed familiarity

  3. What assumptions about the hearer are relevant? What inferences will the hearer draw based on the forms chosen?

  4. Big themes (cont’d) • Some units seem to represent “older” information than others (informational asymmetry) • Given before new • In speech, “new” stuff only appears as a subject when it’s evoked. • In written language, sometimes inferrables are subjects. • You hardly ever have unused/brand-new stuff in subject position.

  5. Again but with examples • In speech, “new” stuff only appears as a subject when it’s evoked. • Pardon, would YOU have change for a quarter? • A guy I work with says HE knows your sister. • In written language, sometimes inferrables are subjects. • I got on a bus yesterday and THE DRIVER was drunk. • Hey! ONE OF THESE EGGS is broken. • You hardly ever have unused/brand-new stuff in subject position. • I bought A BEAUTIFUL DRESS. • ROTTEN RIZZO can’t have a third term.

  6. Ellen Prince never met my mother

  7. Ellen Prince never met my mother

  8. An old friend to my mom recently: “Oh, Cheryl, I forgot how you talk.”

  9. Rituals • Why does Prince lead off with rituals? • What information do they convey?

  10. (And we don’t talk to ourselves) (Much)

  11. Three approaches to givenness • Saliency, “in the addressee’s consciousness” • Problem: Everything is equally new in its first mention • I saw your father yesterday. • I saw a two-headed man yesterday • Other problem: what do you do with inferable stuff? • We got some picnic supplies out of the truck. The beer was warm. • Predictability / recoverability • Problem: • Mary paid John and he/*0 bought himself a new coat. • John paid Mary and he/0 bought himself a new coat • Shared knowledge, (the speaker believes the listener accepts as true vs. stuff the listener doesn’t know • Problem: this language implies that there the speaker and the hearer have some overlapping belief sets • BUT! We only need the speaker’s assumptions • NOT an omniscient observer’s Venn diagram

  12. We think he thinks they think… • Given: What the speaker thinks the listener already knows and accepts as true • New: What the speaker thinks the listener doesn’t yet know

  13. Is this about “activation”? • How do we distinguish/define something “lit up” from something in “background consciousness” from something “in long-term memory but not active”?

  14. What do we think of her taxonomy? • Can we answer one of her chief questions? • Are these phenomena binary, continuum, or something else?

  15. Packaging of info • “The tailoring of an utterance by a sender to meet the particular assumed needs of the intended receiver. That is, information packaging in natural language reflects the sender’s hypotheses about the receiver’s assumptions and beliefs and strategies.” • Prince (1981: 224) • Certainly sounds INTENTIONAL. How does that work?

  16. the girl who made me fall in love with information structure

  17. The questionnaire • The manual for the questionnaire is 272 pages long. Its experiments attempt to control for: • New • Accessible • Given • Topic • Focus • Background • But these have subdivisions (focus can be “out of the blue”, informational, contrastive, selective, corrective, etc).

  18. The real world makes everything messy • Ambiguity • “I saw a thief with a telescope” • “I shot a possum with a camera” • Weird situations • Collocations that just don’t go together: • Bereavedand penguin • Bicycleand wombat • Pegamoidand ululating

  19. I shot a possum with a camera

  20. Focus and intonation • What did John show Mary? • John showed Mary [the PICTures] • Who did John show the pictures? • John showed [MARY] the pictures • John only showed Mary the [the PICTures] • John only showed [MARY] the pictures

  21. Common ground, presupposition, that stuff, you know • I have a cat, and I had to bring my cat to the vet. • #I had to bring my cat to the vet, and I have a cat.

  22. More on focus • Krifka says focus “indicates the presence of alternatives that are relevant for the interpretation of linguistic expressions” • Grandpa didn’t [kick the BUCKet], he passed [aWAY]. • Fortunately, Bill spilled [WHITE] wine on the carpet. • (Often metalinguistic)

  23. Givenness • It seems to have degrees (since there are degrees of saliency) • Anaphora (pronouns, for example) • Deaccenting, reducing, deleting • Bill went to Greenland, and Mary did __, too. • If you’re a focus, you’re probably not a given, but not always: • Mary only saw HIM

  24. Topic and comments • Presupposition: human communication and memory are organized so that they are “about” something. • Databases contain information but they don’t presuppose “aboutness”, do they? • Let’s say you’re keeping a file on Jackie Kennedy. You will file in her entry: • Jacqueline Kennedy married Aristotle Onassis • And although the reverse (AO maried JK) is the same proposition, it would be stored as the entry for Aristotle, not Jackie.

  25. How do we distinguish things? • Pitch accentsfocus and topic • Non-intonation languages use F0 changes like boundary tones, register and tone scaling • Word order • Cleft-sentences • Topicalization • Other stuff • Morphological particles • Noun incorporation • Ellipsis

  26. Appendix (miscellany)

  27. Question • Can we distinguish “topic” and “given”?

More Related