1 / 38

Calibration of the 10inch PMT for IceCube Experiment

Calibration of the 10inch PMT for IceCube Experiment. 03UM1106 Kazuhiro Fujimoto A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science At Graduate School of Science and Technology. OUTLINE. The purpose of IceCube Charge Resolution measurement

cotej
Download Presentation

Calibration of the 10inch PMT for IceCube Experiment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Calibration of the 10inch PMTfor IceCube Experiment 03UM1106 Kazuhiro Fujimoto A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science At Graduate School of Science and Technology

  2. OUTLINE • The purpose of IceCube • Charge Resolution measurement • Noise Counting • Wave form Taking • ROMEO simulator • Summary

  3. Concept of IceCube • Extraterrestrial neutrino source search • AGN, GRB etc • Detect the Cherenkov light from the neutrino-induced charged leptons (e,m,t) by Photo Multiplier Tubes. How to detect n IceCube

  4. Location of Ice Cube Ice Cube 1km AMANDA South Pole

  5. DOM Structure of Ice Cube • 80 Strings • 4800 Digital Optical Modules (DOM) • 1 k㎥ volume • AMANDA within IceCube • Energy Range 107 eV ~ 1020 eV string DOM

  6. thermal After Pulse Photo Multiplier Tube (PMT) Model R7081-02 • Hamamatsu Photonics • Size : 10 inches • Stages of Dynode : 10 • Gain : 107 ~ 108 at HV 2kV (2DScan) =∫V/Rdt Pulse Voltage Dynode Time

  7. Sampling number : 58 Temperature: -32℃ > 5×107 at HV 2000V < 500Hz > 2.0 Operation Gain is 107 PMT Specification in ice • Gain • Noise Rate • Peak to Valley Ratio

  8. Electronics of SPE Response CAMAC PCI Card GP-IB Crate Controller CAMAC Interface Function Generator ADC GP-IB Interface Sync. LinuxPC 70nsec Gate Freezer(-32℃) Signal PMT UV LED NIM Gate Generator Discriminator ~0.01 photo-electron/shot TTL-NIM Converter

  9. Freezer Produced by Nihon Freezer Temp –32degree

  10. PMT Setting into Freezer Base circuit Diffuser attached to UV LED

  11. Peak to Valley Ratio 4~6[ns] Charge Resolution 50~70[mV] Gain Single Photo-Electron Pulse Charge Distribution Pedestal SPE 1 bin = 0.25 pC

  12. Fitting Function

  13. Result 1: Voltage dependence of Gain criteria

  14. criteria Result 2: Voltage dependence of Charge Resolution and Peak to Valley Ratio Charge Resolution Peak to Valley Ratio

  15. Result 3: Distribution of Charge Resolution and Peak to Valley Ratio Charge Resolution 30 Peak to Valley Ratio 30 10 10 20-25 25-30 30-35 35< [%] 2-3 3-4 4-5 5< Total PMTs : 58

  16. Noise Counting • Veto count After pulse and Ringing. • Threshold of Noise Rate is 0.3 p.e. This value is 17.4mV at gain of 5×107 3.4mV at gain of 1×107

  17. After Pulse Electronics of Noise Counting Freezer(-32℃) PMT NIM Signal Discriminator Gate Generator Scaler Dark current noise Output of Discriminator Output of Gate Generator Scaler Δt Δt=800ns~8μs

  18. Result : Distribution of Noise Rate at 5×107 [Hz] Total PMTs : 58

  19. Discussion • Criterion :<500[Hz] at 1×107 • Noise Rate: depend on gain Measured gain dependence of noise rate by the oscilloscope. → This corresponds to< 650[Hz] at 5×107 . ⇒ 71 % OK

  20. Waveform Taking for ROMEO • Make Model of Waveform for the DOM simulation (ROMEO). Fitting Function? Fitting parameters? • Examine S.P.E waveform. Tube to Tube Variance of Pulse Width

  21. Electronics of Waveform Taking LinuxPC GP-IB PCI Board GP-IB Oscilloscope CH2 CH1 GP-IB Interface Function Generator Sync. Signal Discriminator Level Gain 5×107 :10 [mV] NIM Trigger Divider Freezer(-32℃) Discriminator Gate Generator PMT UV LED Coincidence Gate Generator 75nsec ~0.01 photo-electron /shot TTL-NIM Converter

  22. pulse Gaussian Fit SPE pulse [mV] [mV] [ns]

  23. Result :Time Width Distribution of SPE Pulses SPE pulse width : 3.6 ~ 4.8 [ns] <4.0 4.0-4.2 4.2-4.4 4.4<[ns]

  24. ROMEO(the Root-based Optical Module EmulatOr) • The photon propagation of DOM and ice

  25. Light Source Single Photon simulation used ROMEO 0.3pe Photon × Angle of 0° N Photo-electron Angle of –90° Gained Charge 5×107×1.6×10-19 [C] [C] photoelectron × 1st dynode N Photo-electron

  26. -90° N>0.3PE Ninjected Angle dependence of detected photo-electron ratio • Tube to tube difference • 8 ~ 13 % • Angle acceptance • 0 degree : ~0.06 • ±135 degree : <0.01

  27. Summary 1 • Charge Response Fittedby Gaussian + Exponential Gain 107 < 2000V Charge Resolution 0.2 ~ 0.4 at gain of 5×107 Peak to Valley Ratio 2.3 ~ 6.8 at gain of 5×107 Charge Resolution No HV dependence • Noise Counting Noise Rate < 500[Hz] 41 / 58 Satisfied criteria 71[%]

  28. Summery 2 • ROMEO simulation • Waveform taking • Fitted by Gaussian • Width of SPE pulse 2.9 ~ 4.6 [ns] • Angle acceptance • 0 degree : ~0.06 • ±135 degree : <0.01 • Tube to tube difference • 8 ~ 13 %

  29. Result 2: Compare HAMAMATSU to Chiba Univ. At 5×107 Gain At 1×107 Gain Space Charge effect

  30. Result: Fitting Result

  31. Electric: Noise Counting at gain of 1×107 LinuxPC GP-IB PCI Board GP-IB Oscilloscope CH2 CH1 GP-IB Interface Function Generator Self Trigger Sync. Signal Discriminator Level 1500,1600V:10mV 1700~2000V:50mV Freezer(-32℃) PMT UV LED

  32. Noise Counting at gain of 1×107 • Motivation Is Noise thermal or other ? Noise Rate at gain of 5×107 ⅴ Noise Rate at gain of 1×107 ? Noise Rate at gain of 5×107 is NOT satisfiedcriteria.

  33. How to Fitting of Waveform 1. Peak search . Decide x0. 2. 1st Gaussian Fit (Fit Range x0 ±3ns) 3. 2nd Gaussian Fit (Fit Range x0 ± 3σ[ns]) Gaussian Function Variable Factor N : Normalization Factor σ:Sigma[ns] x0: Peak Point[ns] G:Ground[mV]

  34. Result • Average Ratio = 0.77 ±0.12 • Noise Rate criteria > 646 ±110 [Hz] • Failure rate 17 / 58 PMTs 29 [%]

  35. Photo Multiplier Tube (PMT) Model R7081-02 (Have been installed in last winter) • Hamamatsu Photonics • Size : 10 inches • Stages of Dynode : 10 • Gain : 107 ~ 108 at HV 2kV

  36. Motivation of the PMT Calibration • Check the PMTs stand up to Operation. • For DOM simulation with Monte-Carlo. • For Event Reconstruction.

  37. Single Photo-Electron Response • Build Charge Response Model for the DOM simulation • Whether the PMTs satisfy the criteria. HV dependence of Gain

  38. A Scattering Absorption ice bubbles dust dust Polar Ice Optical Properties Average optical ice parameters: λabs ~ 110 m @ 400 nm λsca_eff ~ 20 m @ 400 nm Measurements: ►in-situ light sources ►atmospheric muons

More Related