1 / 27

Building an Argument

Building an Argument. How to write analytically. Outline. Structure Description vs. Argumentation & Analysis Fact & Evidence vs. Opinion Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research Nuance and Persuasion. 1. Structure.

daxia
Download Presentation

Building an Argument

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Building an Argument How to write analytically

  2. Outline • Structure • Description vs. Argumentation & Analysis • Fact & Evidence vs. Opinion • Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research • Nuance and Persuasion

  3. 1. Structure How does MahmoodMamdani explain mass participation in the 1994 Rwandan genocide? Do you find his arguments convincing? If so, why?

  4. 1. Structure • Overall structure is important! • Introductions provide an initial roadmap to your argument • Introductions should contain: • 1-2 lead-in sentences • A clear thesis statement • A brief outline of your argument

  5. 1. Structure • An ‘Analytical’ Essay would look like this: • Introduction. • 1. Brief summary of main author’s argument. • 2. Main author’s strong points – analyse and support with other authors and context/background. • 3. Point of weakness 1 – criticise using other authors, background and context. • 4. Point of weakness 2 – criticise using other authors, background and context • 5. Point of weakness 3 – criticise using other authors, background and context • Conclusion

  6. 1. Structure • Avoid descriptive essays! A prime example of a descriptive structure would be something like this: • Intro • 1. The history of the conflict • 2. Summary of Main Author argument • 3. Summary of Supplementary Author X • 4. Summary of Supplementary Author Y • 5. Analysis • Conclusion

  7. 1. Structure • Every argument is made up of sub-arguments, e.g. in order to argue that Mamdani has downplayed certain factors, the previous student has to convincingly argue that these factors are important • Sub-arguments come in two types: • A. Supporting your main argument with logic and evidence giving credibility to your position • B. Supporting your main argument by discrediting someone else’s opposing/alternative argument with logic and evidence

  8. 2. Description vs. Argumentation & Analysis You need to support every single claim you make in your argument with: • Factual evidence • Other author’s arguments In any case, you need to make explicitly clear why any point you make is relevant to your argument. Each point should close off with a magical “So What?”-Sentence. NEVER ASSUME YOUR AUDIENCE KNOWS WHY SOMETHING YOU BRING UP IS IMPORTANT – MAKE YOUR TRAIN OF THOUGHT, AND EVERY POINT’S RELEVANCE EXPLICIT!

  9. 2. Description vs. Argumentation & Analysis A crude example: NOT a good point: “Mamdani underplays the cultural dynamics of the genocide, because Fuji (2008) says so.” A good point: “Fuji (2008) has shown the importance of cultural factors in the genocide. For example … [case xyz]. Without this dynamic, mass participation would have been a lot more unlikely, because it appears to have been a major factor that pressured people to take part. Mamdani does not give this enough credit.” The good point… … demonstrates the author’s argument with an example/evidence, i.e. it SHOWS that it is valid, rather than just CLAIMING that it is. … it explains why it is relevant to the student’s own argument – the magical “So What?!”-Sentence

  10. 3. Fact & Evidence vs. Opinion “With defeat looming on the horizon, the Hutu Power tendency differentiated even further: the genocidal tendency was born of the crisis of Hutu Power” (Mamdani, 2001: 185).

  11. 3. Fact & Evidence vs. Opinion When things go terribly wrong… … students present other authors’ opinions as facts … subscribe uncritically to someone else’s weak arguments … misrepresent an authors’ argument and twist it out of shape to support their own viewpoint Sometimes, this is done inadvertently – be careful how you phrase things!

  12. 4. Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research Some Common Assumptions

  13. 4. Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research When looking at Quantitative Research, ask yourself… • What are the assumptions behind the approach to the issue? • What sorts of questions are asked, and why? • How are real-world phenomena turned into variables that can be quantified? • That a variable is the best approximation possible or that the data is the best that could be obtained does not mean that the research is without problems! • How is the data interpreted? What claims are made based on the data? • Numbers never just speak for themselves!

  14. 4. Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research When looking at Qualitative Research, ask yourself… • Who are the participants, and what are their potential alterior motives? • How does the researcher relate to the participants? • How is the data interpreted? What claims are made based on the data? • How transparent is the author about the process of interpretation? • Are generalisations supported by the data?

  15. 4. Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research Whether quantitative or qualitative, good research that produced good evidence… • Is open about its assumptions, theoretical background and limitations • Is transparent about and rigorous in its methodology • Makes clear how data was interpreted in order to arrive at its conclusions • Does not make claims it cannot really substantiate

  16. 5. Nuance & Persuasion • Stronger claims do not necessarily make your argument stronger! This applies to the body of your essay as well as your final conclusion. • It is way easier to criticise a claim that is phrased too strongly than it is to dispute a cautious statement. • In the social sciences there is never just one answer, explanation or interpretation – to claim that yours is the absolute best, one and only answer is asking to be criticised! • For example, consider the question, “What caused the Rwandan genocide?”

  17. Wrapping up A good argumentative essay… … is logically structured … has a clear introduction … makes explicit, why certain points/pieces of information and evidence are relevant … does not misrepresent other authors’ arguments just to “prove” a point … engages critically with the literature … makes cautious conclusions rather than stark statements

More Related