1 / 19

Mintzberg’s design parameters

Mintzberg’s design parameters. Pål Sørgaard, Telenor R&D and IfI INF 5250 September 5, 2005. Remember: a book about designing organisations. One way to describe possible designs is to use a set of design parameters (3.2 GHz, 512 MB, 120 GB, 4 USB 2.0)

devin
Download Presentation

Mintzberg’s design parameters

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mintzberg’s design parameters Pål Sørgaard, Telenor R&D and IfI INF 5250 September 5, 2005

  2. Remember: a book about designing organisations • One way to describe possible designs is to use a set of design parameters (3.2 GHz, 512 MB, 120 GB, 4 USB 2.0) • Mintzberg defines a set of 9 design parameters • These are covered in chapters 2-5 • Overview table 2.1 page 27 • Corresponding design questions p 25 Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  3. Use the design questions! • Try to establish the design parameters for your organisation • Example: • Design parameter: training and indoctrination • Related concept (table 2.1): standardisation of skills • Design question (p 25): What skills and knowledge should be required for each position? • Translate into analysis question: How are positions defined in terms of skills and knowledge? • Collect data: look at job descriptions, vacancies in the paper/on the web, ask questions about this in an interview • Establish answer: e.g. main training at universities, but knowledge of the company must be acquired Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  4. Job specialisation (ch 2, p 26) • How many tasks should a given position in the organisation contain, and how specialised should each task be? • Coordination mechanism: standardisation of work content • Horizontal specialisation • basic division of labour • the typical split between different specialities and talents • Vertical specialisation • split between performance of the work from its administration • relation to discussion of Taylorism, scientific management, and job enlargement • Variation between the different parts of the organisation • Think of examples from summer jobs, etc Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  5. Behaviour formalisation (ch 2, p 33) • To what extent should should the work content of each position be standardised? • Coordination mechanism: standardisation of work content • Can take place • by position (e.g., job description) • by work flow (e.g., put orders here!) • by rules (e.g., dress code, code of conduct, use this form) • Useful for manageability, efficiency and equal treatment of clients • Relevance to core values of bureaucracy (Max Weber) • Variation by part of organisation, most common in the operating core Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  6. Training and indoctrination (ch 2, p 39) • What skills and knowledge should be required for each position? • Coordination mechanism: standardisation of skills • Training: the teaching of job-related skills and knowledge • Training through apprentice system or schools? • Professionals in the operating core? • Indoctrination: the process by which organisational norms are acquired • Values can be taught at school • In house programs? • Some agencies train their own people, but fewer than before • Variation by part of the organisation, e.g. common in the technostructure, variation in the operating core Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  7. Unit grouping (ch 3, p 46) • On what basis should should positions be grouped into units and units into larger units? • This is what we typically see in an organisation chart • Coordination mechanism: direct supervision and also mutual adjustment • Related concepts • Administrative division of labour • Formal authority • Informal communication Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  8. Bases for grouping • Possible bases for unit grouping: • knowledge and skill • work process and function • time • output • client • place • Summarised in • market grouping (output, client, place) • functional grouping (knowledge, skill, process, function) Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  9. Criteria for grouping • Work flow interdependencies • pooled (shared resource) • sequential • reciprocal • Process interdependencies • related to shared specialisation, consulting each other • Scale interdependencies • e.g. to exploit economies of scale • Social interdependencies • also a reality! Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  10. Market grouping vs functional grouping • This is one of the classical dilemmas • Telenor Mobil (Norway) part of Telenor Mobile (international) or Telenor Nordic • Functional grouping • Main concern with process and scale interdependencies • Encourages specialisation • Weak on customer focus and coordination of work flow (relies on direct supervision) • Market grouping • Main concern with whole product, meeting the customer, handling of complex work flows • Reduced quality of specialised work • Cannot take the same advantage of economies of scale Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  11. Unit size (ch 3, p 65) • How large should each unit be; how many people should report to a given manager? • Coordination mechanism: direct supervision and also mutual adjustment • Related to informal communication and “span of control” • If using direct supervision: how many can you control? • If working tightly together: what size works best? • Unit size driven up by standardisation, employees’ need for autonomy, and need for short communication chains • Unit size driven down by need for close direct supervision, mutual adjustment, other tasks of the manager, and employees’ need for consultation, advice and feedback Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  12. Planning and control systems (ch 4, p 73) • To what extent should the output of each position or unit be standardised? • Coordination mechanism: standardisation of output • Heard of “mål- og resultatstyring”? • This was modern when the limitations of scientific management were realised • fad of the 40ies and 50ies Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  13. Performance control • Often after the fact • Typically a financial focus • Normally supported by IT (MIS: management information system) • Most applicable when units are relatively independent • interdependencies mainly pooled, e.g. financial resources • units typically grouped on the basis of market Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  14. Action planning • Goes into the units • Nonroutine decisions and actions planned in advance • Plans for • building a ship • fighting a battle • starting a gsm-operation in Pakistan Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  15. Liaison devices (ch 4, p 81) • What mechanisms should be established to facilitate mutual adjustment among positions and units? • Coordination mechanism: mutual adjustment • When standardisation and direct supervision are insufficient • Used to overcome the limitation present in any hierarchical structure • Various mechanisms available to support mutual adjustment • Fad of the 60ies (and later!) • Excellently treated by Jay Galbraith • core concept: task uncertainty Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  16. Some liaison devices • Liaison positions (no funds) • Task forces and standing committees • Integrating managers (with funds) • Matrix structures • regional and functional responsibilities in Oslo • The devices can be used to handle market issues in functionally grouped organisation or to handle functional issues in a market based organisation Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  17. Vertical decentralisation (ch 5, p 101) • How much decision-making power should be delegated to the managers down the line of authority? • We focus on decentralisation of authority (not issues of location) • Often referred to as delegation • Coordination mechanism: mutual adjustment (between managers that have the power needed) Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  18. Horizontal decentralisation (ch 5, p 105) • How much decision-making power should pass from the line manager to the staff specialists and operators? • Coordination mechanisms: standardisation • Power to the analysts (decentralisation to people in the technostructure that set the standards) • Power to the experts (in R&D , in the operating core, etc) Pål Sørgaard, R&D

  19. Five models for decentralisation, see figure 5-4 • Vertical and horizontal centralisation • Limited horizontal decentralisation (selective) • typically to the technostructure • Limited vertical decentralisation (parallel) • strong divisional leaders • Selective vertical and horizontal decentralisation • ad hoc, as needed, highly organic • Vertical and horizontal decentralisation • professionals in the operating core run the game • Each of these fit with one of the main configurations • See table p 153 and table 12-2 Pål Sørgaard, R&D

More Related