1 / 20

Intergroup Conflict

Intergroup Conflict. Outline . Sources of intergroup conflict Competition and conflict Social categorization Intergroup conflict resolution Contact Beyond contact Cognitive cures. Robbers Cave Experiment (Sherifs, 1961).

eilis
Download Presentation

Intergroup Conflict

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Intergroup Conflict

  2. Outline • Sources of intergroup conflict • Competition and conflict • Social categorization • Intergroup conflict resolution • Contact • Beyond contact • Cognitive cures

  3. Robbers Cave Experiment (Sherifs, 1961) • A field study attempting to better understand the causes and consequences of intergroup conflict. • Subjects: • Normal boys of the same age, educational level, similar sociocultural backgrounds • Group formation: • Arrived in 2 separate groups (Rattlers and the Eagles). Remained apart for one week.

  4. Robbers Cave Experiment (Sherifs, 1961) • Ingroup/outgroup rivalry: • Occurred spontaneously when each group realized the other boys were there. It was spurred by the Sherifs who set up competitive tournament. • Tournament conflict escalation: • Rejection, verbal insults, name calling and physical violence

  5. Robbers Cave Experiment (Sherifs, 1961)

  6. Competition and Conflict: Us versus them 1) Competition between groups for resources • Realistic conflict theory: • Intergroup conflict is caused by competition among groups over limited resources. • Competition implicated in class struggles, international warfare, racism...

  7. Competition and Conflict • 2. Reciprocity of contentious strategies • Groups also follow the norm of reciprocity • Hatfield/McCoy dispute • A spiral model of conflict intensification accurately describes Robbers cave: • Verbal abuse • Avoidance • Discrimination • Physical assault

  8. Competition and Conflict • 3. Scapegoating • Hostility caused by frustrating circumstances are sometimes taken out on innocent members of other social groups • Explains rise in prejudice when the economy takes a downturn • Study showing a significant negative correlation between the number of black men lynched in the US and the price of cotton. (Hovland and Sears, 1940)

  9. Class Activity • Form two groups: • Group A: People wearing tennis shoes • Group B: People not wearing tennis shoes • Group tasks: • Group A: • List as many reasons as you can think of as to why the members of group B did not wear tennis shoes today. • Group B: • List as many reasons as you can think of as to why the members of group A are wearing tennis shoes today.

  10. Social Categorization: Perceiving Us and Them • 1) Ingroup/outgroup bias: • We favor our own group and derogate the outgroup • At Robbers Cave, when asked to name their friends Eagles picked Eagles, Rattlers picked Rattlers • Boys used negative characteristics to describe the outgroup, but rated their own group more favorably

  11. Social Categorization • Cognitive consequences of categorization • A. Outgroup homogeneity effect: • Assuming outgroup members are all the same • B. Ingroup differentiation bias: • We assume our group is complex and diverse • C. Extremity bias: • We make more extreme judgments about people in other groups

  12. Social Categorization • D. Law of small numbers: • We base judgments about another group based on observations of a small number of individuals • E. Group attribution error: • We base judgments about individuals on the general characteristics of the whole group • F. Stereotypes: • We rely on cognitive generalizations about qualities and characteristics of members of a particular group

  13. Social Categorization • Does categorization cause conflict? • Minimal group paradigm • A research procedure used to study intergroup conflict that creates temporary groupings of anonymous people whose interdependence is virtually nil • Even in minimal groups there is evidence of bias!

  14. Social Identity Theory (SIT) • Three basic assumptions of SIT: • People categorize the social world into ingroups and outgroups • People strive for a positive self-concept; they derive a sense of self-esteem from their social identity • People’s self-concept partly depends on their evaluation of their group relative to others. • Thus, Social Identity Theory suggests: • We ridicule members of other groups to raise the value of our own group; thus, raising the value of our self.

  15. Intergroup Conflict Resolution • Peaceful co-existence through benign contact • Contact hypothesis: • Frequent contact between groups reduces conflict between those groups • The Sherifs brought the boys together • Watching films, lighting fireworks, eating • This failed! • Contact during meals lead to food fights!

  16. Intergroup Conflict Resolution • Beyond contact • Superordinate goals hypothesis: • Situations that encourage groups to work together to achieve a common goal can reduce conflict between these groups. • Sherifs created a series of emergencies that could only be handled by the groups working together • After 6 days of this cooperation the tensions were fairly well wiped out!

  17. Superordinate Goals

  18. Happy Ending!

  19. Conflict Reducing Contact Situations • Necessary ingredients: • 1) Cooperation: • Work together for common goals • 2) Status • Equal status! • 3) Personal interaction • Involving, positive interactions; not superficial • 4) Norms • Encouraging egalitarian attitudes • 5) Positive outcomes: • Should results in success!

  20. Intergroup Conflict Resolution • Cognitive cures for conflict • Decategorization • Minimizing the salience of group memberships and stressing the individuality of each person • Recategorization • Collapsing groups in conflict into a single group or category • Controlled stereotyped thinking (Devine) • Stereotypes are automatically activated- but we can control our subsequent thoughts

More Related