1 / 22

An Abundance Spread in the Bootes I Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy?

The. An Abundance Spread in the Bootes I Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy?. John E. Norris The Australian National University Gerard Gilmore University of Cambridge R.F.G. Wyse Johns Hopkins University. (together with M. Wilkinson, D. Zucker, V. Belokurov, N. Evans & D. Quinn).

elvin
Download Presentation

An Abundance Spread in the Bootes I Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The An Abundance Spread in the Bootes I Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy? John E. Norris The Australian National University Gerard Gilmore University of Cambridge R.F.G. Wyse Johns Hopkins University (together with M. Wilkinson, D. Zucker, V. Belokurov, N. Evans & D. Quinn)

  2. Belokurov et al. 2006 ApJ, 647, L111; 2007 ApJ, 654, 897  Cen M71 Mv = -5.8 rh = 230 pc (13 arcmin) Vrad = 100 km/sec Distance = 60 kpc [Fe/H] = -2.5(Munos 2006, Martin et al 2007)

  3. Gilmore et al 2007 ApJ, 663, 948 Mass enclosed within stellar extent ~ 4 x 107M Globular star clusters, no DM

  4. Bootes I with AAT/AAOMEGA Blue spectra R=5000 Red spectra R=14000

  5. Bootes I : Radial velocity vs Radial distance Membership criterion: 90 < Vr < 115 km/sec (~+/- 2 )

  6. Bootes I : C4150 > 200 cnts/pix , Radial vel. vs Radial dist. rh

  7. Spectra of 15 radial velocity members of Bootes I g0/(g-r)0/[Fe/H] Internal error: ([Fe/H])= 0.35 W(CaIIK), B-V Beers et al 1999 calibration [Fe/H]

  8. Bootes I compared with M15 Bootes I M15 (B-V)0/[Fe/H]

  9. Boo-1137 versus extremely metal-poor stars Is Boo-1137 (with r = 24 arcmin) a member? This appears to be very likely, given the rareness of objects with [Fe/H] < -3.0. From the HK survey for metal-poor stars and for [Fe/H] < -3.0, Beers et al (1992) find 5 stars with V < 14, and B-V > 0.7 over 2300 sq.deg. For the HES, Christlieb (2008, priv. comm.) finds 9 stars with B < 14.5, B-V < 0.7 over 7000 sq.deg. From this, we estimate one should expect only ~0.02 field halo giants having [Fe/H] < -3.0 within the central 30 arcmin of Bootes.

  10. Bootes I: Ca II Triplet vs Ca II K

  11. Helmi et al 2006 ApJ, 651, L121

  12. CONCLUSIONS • We have obtained spectra of 16 putative radial velocity RGB members of the low-luminosity Bootes I dSph galaxy (90 < Vr < 115 km/s) with sufficient S/N for [Fe/H] determination • In this sample there is an abundance range of [Fe/H] ~ 1.7 dex, with one star having [Fe/H = -3.4 • The abundance dispersion is ([Fe/H]) = 0.4 +/- 0.1, which is of the same order as those of the Galaxy’s more luminous dSph systems, and  Centauri • This suggests that the large mass (> 107 Mo) normally assumed to foster self-enrichment and the production of abundance spreads of the - and iron-peak elements was provided by the non-baryonic material in Bootes I.

More Related