1 / 5

Center for the Pacific Asian Family

Center for the Pacific Asian Family. Organizational Evaluation Project. Project Background. CPAF had an overarching theory of change that needed a working logic model for each program Data collection tools had been created organically as programs changed and developed

eryk
Download Presentation

Center for the Pacific Asian Family

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Center for the Pacific Asian Family Organizational Evaluation Project

  2. Project Background • CPAF had an overarching theory of change that needed a working logic model for each program • Data collection tools had been created organically as programs changed and developed • Program database was constructed to measure outputs instead of outcomes

  3. What we asked ourselves • How do we measure our impact? • Survivor-centered, trauma-informed definitions of “success” • How do the services we provide help survivors reach their goals? • Development of working logic models • How do our tools help us measure? • Review and revision of data collection tools • Exploration of database options

  4. Tools to share • Goals “menu” for case plans • Survivor self-assessment and exit survey • “Storycorps” template

  5. What we’ve been thinking about • Creating a “culture of curiosity:” involving staff at all levels with discussions about outcomes and sharing data across the organization • Developing culturally and linguistically sensitive approaches to data collection and evaluation • Expanding the definitions of “data”: finding creative ways to gather survivor input • Community-building: engaging with survivors beyond their participation in our programs • Alignment with the field: dialogue with funders and other DV providers about outcome measurements

More Related