1 / 40

Public Forum April 15, 2009

Belmont Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Review Phase I. Public Forum April 15, 2009. Office of Community Development. Larry Koff & Associates Bluestone Planning Group Todreas Hanley Associates Abramson & Associates, Inc. Tetra Tech Rizzo Nelson Nygaard.

fabian
Download Presentation

Public Forum April 15, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Belmont Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Review Phase I Public Forum April 15, 2009 Office of Community Development • Larry Koff & Associates • Bluestone Planning Group • Todreas Hanley Associates • Abramson & Associates, Inc. • Tetra Tech Rizzo • Nelson Nygaard

  2. What will you get from tonight’s meeting? We will: Present key information about Belmont’s existing conditions Dispel some common myths Identify possible priorities, and ways to deal with-trade offs Get your feedback on the priorities and trade-offs Take the survey at: http://www.town.belmont.ma.us/Home/

  3. Presentation Overview • Introduction • Existing Conditions • Dispelling Myths • Objectives, Trade-offs and Priorities • Next Steps • Comments, Questions and Answers

  4. What is a Comprehensive Plan? • Policy framework that guides a community's development and land use activities. • Long-term (5 to 20 years) objectives. • Based on community’s priorities and common expectations for the look and feel of the town

  5. What is a Comprehensive Plan? • Guides physical, social, and economic development of a town in the context of its region • policy statements • goals • action Items (regulatory, public and private actions) • standards and benchmarks • maps • Topical areas • economic development • transportation • energy • housing • open space and recreation • historic preservation • public facilities and infrastructure

  6. Project Timeline • Phase I (January to June 2009) • January to February Consultants selected, review and summary of existing documents and Zoning Bylaw • February to April Comprehensive Plan Committee (3 meetings) • Mid April • Public Meeting • On-line survey (4/15 to 5/15) • May • On-line survey continues (4/15 to 5/15) • Four additional meetings with smaller groups • June • Phase I report prepared

  7. Comprehensive Plan Process Working Vision for Belmont’s Future (Vision 21 Committee, Town Meeting, April 2001) • Thriving Business Centers • Residents and neighborhoods support retail needs and opportunities • Preserve small town community atmosphere • Comprehensive Plan Phase I: • Economic Development, Sustainable Neighborhoods, Existing Conditions, Needs, Issues and Opportunities, Trade-offs and Priorities • Comprehensive Plan Phase II: • Strategies Assessment, Implementation Tools, and Action Plan

  8. Presentation Overview • Introduction • Existing Conditions • Dispelling Myths • Objectives, Trade-offs and Priorities • Next Steps • Questions and Answers

  9. Historic Development Patterns • Trolley and Rail formed transportation network – prior to major automobile use. • Villages evolved around commercial squares, transit lines

  10. Portrait of Existing Land Use • Low Density Suburban Estates • Residences and parks Moderately Dense Village Character • Higher density housing and mix of uses surrounds village commercial centers and transit. • Commercial development concentrated in village centers

  11. Existing Village Centers “Villages” form focal point for community: • Walkable, interconnecting neighborhoods • Mix of centrally located facilities, neighborhood schools. Belmont Hill

  12. Regional Market Context

  13. Housing

  14. Transportation • Rail and bus service to Cambridge & Boston. • Limited transit to neighboring communities • Radial auto access via Route 2, Trapelo Road • Intertown auto traffic through Belmont on Pleasant St (Rt 60), local arterials

  15. Commuting Patterns Belmont’s workforce depends upon regional infrastructure to commute to the following locations: Commuter rail time to Boston is approximately 16 minutes, Brandeis 12 minutes. Public transit passengers: 250 per day board train, 3,500 per day ride buses Waverly Square is the largest hub of transit use.

  16. Open Space Resources • Regional parks and green corridors located north/west of Route 60 • Town-wide municipal & recreation facilities reinforce Belmont Center • Neighborhood Village areas served by school yards and rec. fields

  17. Presentation Overview • Introduction • Existing Conditions • Dispelling Myths • Objectives, Trade-offs and Priorities • Next Steps • Questions and Answers

  18. Dispelling Myths: #1 Myth: Belmont’s village centers are stable. Reality: Chronic vacancies and deteriorating buildings, flat demand for specialty food and other desired uses, and competition from nearby centers undermines the character and viability of Belmont’s villages. • Key sites in Waverley, Cushing, and Central Squares are vacant and deteriorating. • Infrastructure changes such as MBTA facilities can result in a net loss or gain for Belmont’s villages, depending on the town’s initiative.

  19. Dispelling Myths: #2 Myth: The Town is fully built out and will not change. Reality: There are Short Term Opportunities for redevelopment of vacant and underutilizedproperties.

  20. Dispelling Myths: # 3 Myth: Increasing density means more cars, school children, lower tax revenue. Reality: Density compatible with historic village development patterns will generate net benefits.

  21. Presentation Overview • Introduction • Existing Conditions • Dispelling Myths • Objectives, Trade-offs and Priorities • Next Steps • Questions and Answers

  22. A Town of Villages: Objectives Compact village centers are a sustainable form of development. • Economic Viability: Commercial centers continue to thrive and the town leverages private investment to fund services and facilities. • Sustainable Design: The structure and character of villages and residential neighborhoods is enhanced while providing for local needs. • Environmentally Efficient: New development and roadway and infrastructure improvements allow for reduction in auto usage andcarbon emissions.

  23. 1: Village Centers Belmont wants thriving business areas. However: • Regional competition, small sites, and multiple owners limit market potential. • Current regulations (zoning, liquor license, parking) and limited public improvements retard growth of niche markets and private investment in revitalization and redevelopment.

  24. Trade-offs & Priorities 1: Village Centers What improvement opportunities might apply to the Village Centers? • No change • Public/Private partnership of sign and façade, marketing, and streetscape improvements • Management of parking supply-both public and private • Zoning changes to permit greater height? density? mixed uses? • Permitting wine and beer licensing for smaller establishments • Other?

  25. 2A: Transportation Sustainable neighborhoods have convenient access to services and walkable neighborhoods. However: • Neighborhood sustainability is weakened by missing gaps in the network of roads, bike, and pedestrian routes between the Village Centers. • Key transit connections to/from centers of employment, shopping, recreation, public facilities, and transit stations are missing.

  26. Trade-offs & Priorities 2A: Transportation What opportunities would you pursue to reduce auto dependency and improve access for Belmont commuters and residents? • No change • Bus connections to Alewife, Arlington Center, Watertown Square • Improved bike paths • Construction of park and ride facilities at Waverley and along Trapello Road corridor • Relocate/consolidate commuter rail stations • Other?

  27. 2B: Parking The vitality of Village Centers depends primarily upon the need for parking management reform. However: • It is difficult to get consensus on new strategies to affect change, (restrictions in abutting neighborhoods, the use of existing on and off street resources, and limits in supply). • Inflexible zoning requirements for new development discourage new businesses.

  28. Trade-offs & Priorities 2B: Parking What opportunities would you pursue to improve commercial area parking? • No change • Allow for shared parking among existing commercial and non-profit uses • Utilize street right-of-ways and publicly owned land to increase surface parking • Regulatory changes to allow for parking in residential areas that support commercial activity and to balance needs of shoppers, employees, and commuters • Construct public or public/private financed parking garages (where?)

  29. 3: Public Spaces and Facilities Public spaces, recreation areas, and greenbelt connections are needed to enhance sustainable villages. However: • Large open space areas are mostly in the western part of town. • There is a lack of streetscape amenities for pedestrians in Village Centers and no entity stepping forward to make improvements.

  30. Trade-offs & Priorities 3: Public Spaces and Facilities What are the greatest needs for public spaces? • No change • Replacement/improvement of schools • Replacement/improvement of other municipal buildings • Expansion/relocation of recreation facilities (in municipal center? other neighborhoods?) • Improving pedestrian and bicycle connections to village centers and public sites • Enhancing the character of village centers/commercial districts with public gathering spaces • Other?

  31. 4: Residential Development Historic development patterns have resulted in a variety of housing types. Continuing demand for housing for elderly and young professionals requires more of this historic development pattern, especially in and near Village Centers. However: • Current zoning regulations discourage this variety by requiring special permits that make development or redevelopment risky for applicants. • There is fear from neighbors about increased density in the Village Centers.

  32. Trade-offs & Priorities 4: Residential Development What characteristics would you encourage for residential development? • No change? • To meet needs of Belmont’s own populations including seniors, young adults? • To be affordable to a range of incomes? • To facilitate revitalization of commercial areas? • To match density/context of surrounding neighborhoods? • Other?

  33. Presentation Overview • Introduction • Existing Conditions • Dispelling Myths • Objectives, Trade-offs and Priorities • Next Steps • Questions and Answers

  34. Next Steps: Phase II Comprehensive Plan: Phase II • Evaluate choices to achieve goals and priorities. • Refine strategies and implementation measures based on public feedback from Phase I and continued feedback in Phase II. • Adopt a Plan that will: • Leverage state grants. • Guide zoning reform. • Guide public investment including MBTA planning for transit changes.

  35. Examples of Phase II Choices • Enhance public spaces, streetscapes, facilities, parking • Improve mix and character of development • Modify Zoning • Facilitate public/private partnership • Expand transportation alternatives • Obtain funding to implement needed improvements and programs

  36. Short Term Fiscal Benefits of completing Comprehensive Plan • $75,000 investment on completion of Comprehensive Plan Phase II could leverage: • Access to $600 million in State’s Commonwealth Capital Programs (14 grants) based on commitment to 32 land use planning and regulatory practices related to sustainable development • Example: $1M in PWED funding for transit, streetscape, pedestrian, parking, and bike path improvements • Federal Stimulus funding for public facilities and infrastructure

  37. Short Term Fiscal Benefits completing Comprehensive Plan • Potential doubling of commercial tax base in long term with private investment in commercial and residential development • Example: New zoning could attract private investment comparable to the proposed Oakley neighborhood 40R development • Private investment by property owners commercial areas through upgrading of properties, marketing, and cost sharing of public improvements

  38. Presentation Overview • Introduction • Existing Conditions • Dispelling Myths • Objectives, Trade-offs and Priorities • Next Steps • Questions and Answers

  39. Comments & Questions For more information contact: Jay Szklut Office of Community Development 19 Moore Street Belmont, MA 02478-0900 Telephone: (617) 993-2666 Take the survey at: http://www.town.belmont.ma.us/Home/

  40. Comments & Questions Tonight: Give your feedback on the Trade offs and Priorities Are we missing priorities? How can we get more input on this plan? Help us spread the word about the on-line survey Take the survey at: http://www.town.belmont.ma.us/Home/

More Related