1 / 25

Extratropical Storm Analysis

Extratropical Storm Analysis. Storm Selection EST Methodology & Input Preparation Procedures Validation of EST methodology Validation of Storm Suite Consideration of Tidal Contributions to Total Surge Elevations. Storm Selection.

ganya
Download Presentation

Extratropical Storm Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Extratropical Storm Analysis Storm Selection EST Methodology & Input Preparation Procedures Validation of EST methodology Validation of Storm Suite Consideration of Tidal Contributions to Total Surge Elevations

  2. Storm Selection • Storms based on historical water level events measured at National Ocean Station measurement locations • Only stations with long continuous measurements are considered • Same methodology applied in FEMA NC study NOS Stations with a minimum of 15-years of data in the study domain

  3. Storm Selection • Residual water levels (measured-predicted tide) were computed to select storms based on surge rather than tide • Individual stations with gaps in the historical record were removed to avoid bias in the selection process Historical residual water level measurements at Chesapeake City, MD – NOS Station 8573927

  4. Storm Selection Seven NOS stations representing the period of Jan-26-1975 to Aug-31-2008

  5. Storm Selection • Individual peaks at each station were identified above the 99th percentile threshold • Multiple peaks within a 3-day period considered within the same storm • Events were ranked individually by station • Events from tropical systems identified and removed • 30 storm events identified from event list

  6. Storm Selection • Three NOS stations with shorter records (1998-2003) used to check storm list in data void regions • Selected storm list represents top 4 of 5, 3 of 5 and 3 of 5 events within each of the station’s period of measurement

  7. EST Methodology The EST is a statistical procedure for simulating lifecycle time sequences of nondeterministic multiparameter systems. Any natural process for which some temporal cycle can be assign is a candidate application of the EST. The EST utilizes observed and/or computed parameters associated with site-specific historical events as a basis for developing a methodology for generating multiple lifecycle simulation of storm activity and the effects associated with each simulated event. Contrary to the JPM, the technique does not rely on assumed parametric relationships but uses the joint probability relationships inherent in the local database.

  8. EST Methodology Based on a “Bootstrap” resampling-with-replacement, interpolation, and subsequent smoothing technique in which a random sampling of a finite length database is used to generate a larger database. Key assumption is that future storms will be statistically similar in magnitude and frequency to past events. The input database (training set) is parameterized to define the characteristics of each event and the impacts of that event. Parameters that define the storm are referred to as input vectors. Response vectors define storm-related impacts. The input and response vectors are used as a basis for generating lifecycle simulations of storm-event activity.

  9. EST – Data preparation For the FEMA Region III study a uni-variant analyses was performed (single input vector/single response vector). The input vector was the observed or modeled peak water surface elevation. The tidal contribution was removed from the observations by subtracting the predicted tide amplitude. The response vector was the observed or modeled peak water surface elevation. The input and response vectors enter into the EST routine through the “Reach.estin” ASCII input file.

  10. EST – Data preparation EST input file hbootin.dat • The EST model input parameters include: • Number of storms in training set (30/90). • Average number of storms per year (0.88235). • Length of simulation in years (500). • Number of simulations (1000).

  11. EST – Validation of Methodology An EST analysis was performed on the long-term measurements at 7 stations and compared and the resulting stage-frequency relationships were compared to the GPD parametric analysis technique:

  12. EST – Validation of Methodology

  13. EST – Validation of Methodology

  14. EST – Validation Storm Suite An EST analysis was performed on the selected storm suite measurements and compared to the long-term measurements:

  15. EST – Validation Storm Suite

  16. EST – Validation Storm Suite

  17. EST – Validation Storm Suite

  18. EST – Validation Storm Suite(modeling) An EST analysis was performed on the modeled selected storm suite and compared to the long-term measurements:

  19. EST – Validation Storm Suite(modeling)

  20. EST – Validation Storm Suite(modeling)

  21. EST – Validation Storm Suite(modeling)

  22. EST – Tide Contribution The tide contribution to total water surface elevations was accounted for by expanding the training set of storms input to EST. Assumes extratropical storms are of sufficient duration that high tide will occur during the event. Peak storm surge was increased by the high tide amplitude corresponding to mean, neap, and spring tidal ranges. Introduced relative weighting of 2 for storms associated with mean high tides, storms associated with neap and spring high tide were given a weight of 1.

  23. EST – Tide Contribution

  24. EST – Tide Contribution

  25. Extratropical Storm Analysis Questions ?

More Related