1 / 32

DIVERSITY IN FAMILY LAW OVER TIME & ACROSS THE UNITED STATES

DIVERSITY IN FAMILY LAW OVER TIME & ACROSS THE UNITED STATES. SOC 5810 – Law and Society Dr. Mary C. Sengstock, Ph.D., C.C.S. Professor of Sociology Wayne State University http://users.wowway.com/~marycay910. LAW & THE FAMILY. Legal Conflicts of Interest Over Family:

gwyn
Download Presentation

DIVERSITY IN FAMILY LAW OVER TIME & ACROSS THE UNITED STATES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DIVERSITY IN FAMILY LAW OVER TIME& ACROSS THE UNITED STATES SOC 5810 – Law and Society Dr. Mary C. Sengstock, Ph.D., C.C.S. Professor of Sociology Wayne State University http://users.wowway.com/~marycay910

  2. LAW & THE FAMILY • Legal Conflicts of Interest Over Family: • Courts Have Had Lots of Control Re Family Life • Most Issues Controlled In States’ Rights • Therefore Much Variation • Through Decisions on Any Number of Issues • U.S. Has a Strong Belief in Family Privacy … • But Also Want to Ensure Families Do It Right! • If They Don’t “Act Right” – Courts Intervene! • Marriage – Child-Rearing – Child Support, etc.

  3. ISSUES TO BE DISCUSSED • Rights of the Child: • Child Abuse • Education • Custody & Visitation • Women’s Rights in Family • Battered Women’s Syndrome • Death & Dying • Use & Discontinuance of Life Support

  4. CHILD ABUSE (1) • People v. Ball(IL Ct of Ap, 1973) • Ball Was Teacher – Paddled Disruptive Student • Hit c. 10x – Observed By Other Teacher • Boy Not Badly Injured – But Parents Filed Battery Complaint • Can Teacher Administer Corporal Punishment if State Statutes Allow? • Court Said This Was Allowed (Even Though in This Case Parents Disapproved).

  5. CHILD ABUSE (2) • State v. Ringer (1970): • Observers Cannot Come to Aid of Child Being Disciplined By Parents – Unless Great Excessive Force • BUT: Courts Have Supported Rights of A Prisoner to Come to Aid of Fellow Prisoner Being Attacked By a Guard – Whom He Killed (Mass v. Martin, 1976)

  6. CHILD ABUSE (3) • State v. Williquette (Wisc Sup Ct, 1986) • Williquette Charged with Child Abuse … • For Failing to Prevent Husband from Beating & Sexually Abusing Son (7) & Daughter (8) • Trial Court Dismissed Case … • BUT: Wisc Sup Ct Overturned: • She Knew He Was Abusive – Don’t Leave Children • 1 Dissent: Wisc. Does Not Impose This on Parents Nor Allow Legal Action if Done • Based on English Common Law  U.S. Law

  7. CHILD ABUSE (4): KILL UNBORN CHILD • Does Protecting Child Extend to Unborn? • Keeler v. Superior Ct of Amador Cty (CA), 1970 • About Same Time as Roe v. Wade • Couple Divorcing,Wife Pregnant by Other Man • Keeler Kicked Her in Abdomen, Child Stillborn • Keeler Charged with Murder of Unborn Child • Court Ruled Fetus Not a Human Being • 1 Dissent: Quickening Fetus Is Human Under Common Law (NOTE: Other Courts Discussing This! Some Hold Women Responsible for Drug Use in Pregnancy)

  8. EDUCATION (1) • Has Child Right to Parental Support for Education? (Roe v. Doe, NY, 1971) • Father Said Would Pay for Daughter’s College Provided She Stayed in Dorm…She Moved Out • Father Refused to Pay … • Court Said His Demand Was Not Unreasonable • One Judge Said Courts Should Not Intervene in Family Issues Unless Grave Harm

  9. EDUCATION (2) • Comment on Support for Education: • Fathers Have Generally Been Seen as Having Obligation to Support Children … • Children Can Buy Things & Charge to Father … • Can Also Sue Fathers, Charge Criminal Neglect • Mothers Generally Seen as Having This Only as 2ndary Obligation … • EXCEPT Women on Welfare – Who Are Expected to Work to Support Children

  10. EDUCATION (3) • Can School Policy Prohibit Parents From Using Children in Religious Activities? Prince v. Mass (US Sup Ct, 1943) • Prince Was Jehovah Witness – Took Children to Distribute Literature • Charged with Violating Child Labor Laws • S. Ct: Parents & Children Have Right to Practice Religion, Get Religious Training • But Religious Practice Again Public Welfare Not Allowed • Child Should Be in School – Not Working for religious Group

  11. CUSTODY OF CHILDREN (1) • Is an Advantage Given to Women? • Ex Parte Devine (Ala, 1981) • Ala Held That in “Tender Years” Mothers Were Preferred – Mothers Got Custody Unless Father Could Prove Her “Unfit” • Mr. Devine Contended Ala Law Gave Unfair Advantage to Women in Custody Disputes • Ala Court Agreed – Said This Provision Violated 14th Amendment to U.S. Constitution

  12. CUSTODY OF CHILDREN (2) • Impact of Moving on Custody (Cooper v Cooper, NJ, 1984) • What Are Limits on Parent’s Right to Move? • Mr. Cooper Wanted to Prevent Mrs. Cooper form Moving from NJ, Claimed It Would Complicate His Visitation • Court Said Custodial Parent Can Move to Other State If It’s Good for Parent & Financially Advantageous to Children

  13. CUSTODY OF CHILDREN (3) • How About Moving Out of Country? • Goldstein v. Goldstein (RI, 1973) • Mr. Goldstein Wanted to Take 9 ½ Yr Old Daughter to Israel; Daughter Wanted to Go • Mrs. Goldstein Claimed This Gave Inappropriate Weight to Child’s Preference • Court Said It Was Important But Only 1 Factor Out of Many – Had to Consider General Good of Child – Also Child Choosing Placed Strain on Everyone

  14. CUSTODY OF CHILDREN (4) • Interracial Marriage & Custody (Palmore & Sidoti, US Sup Ct, 1984) • Parents Divorced; Wife (Sidoti) Got Custody • Palmore Sued for Custody Because New Husband Was Different Race  Social Strain • Trial Court Awarded Custody to Father … • But U.S. Sup Court Reversed – Racial Mixed Marriage Not Sufficient Reason to Change Custody

  15. CUSTODY OF CHILDREN (5) • Physical Disability & Custody: Mrs. Carney Left Husband & 2 Sons (In Re Remarriage of Carney, Calif, 1979) • 4 Years Later Mr. Carney Became Paralyzed in Auto Accident • Mrs. Carney Wanted Kids Back • Calif Trial Court Gave Mother Custody … • U.S. Sup. Ct. Reversed – Saying Disability Is Not Sufficient Reason to Change Custody

  16. SEXUAL BEHAVIOR & CUSTODY • Does “Sexual Experimentation” of Custodial Parent Make Her Unfit? (Feldman v. Feldman, NY, 1974) • Mrs. Feldman Had Custody – Ex-Husband Saw Copies of Screw Magazine In House – Sued for Custody – No Claim She Was Unfit • Trial Court Gave Kids to Father – S. Ct Reversed – Said Court Was Subjective – Holds Women to Higher Standard Than Men • But Man Can Be Forced to Avoid Female Visitors When Children Visit (DiVita v. DiVita (NJ, 1976)

  17. RELIGION & CUSTODY • Religion & Custody (Quiner v. Quiner, Calif, 1967) • Couple Divorced, Wife Had Custody Joined Strict Religion Forbade Interaction With Outsiders, Including Father • Calif. Court Gave Father Custody – CA Sup Ct. Reversed – Said Religion Wasn’t Sufficient Reason to Change Custody • Illustrates Different Views in Different States: • CA: Wants Proof Religion Affects Child in Case • Wisc: Wants to Know If It Might Affect Child • Changes Burden of Proof!

  18. PATERNITY & CUSTODY • Paternity & Visitation: Michael H. v. Gerald D. (S.Ct, 1989) • Michael Had Affair With Gerald’s Wife – Resulting in a Child, Gerald Listed as Father • Michael Wanted Visitation • Calif & U.S. Sup. Court Said: • Husband Presumed to Be Father • Man Has No Rights to Child Conceived With Another Man’s Wife • Illustrates Changing Views Re Parenthood! • Today Often Based on DNA – Even if Adulterous

  19. HOMOSEXUALITY & VISITATION • Does Gay Parent Give Up Visitation? (JLP v. DJP, Mass, 1982) • JLP Was Homosexual, Attended Gay Church • He Had Visitation But Could Not Keep Them Over Night – Nor Take Then to His Church • He Appealed, Saying It Violated His Rights • Court Said They Could Look at Anything They Want to Determine Best Interest of Child – Even Bad Statistics on Gays Being More Likely to Abuse Children

  20. GENERAL RULES OF CUSTODY & VISITATION In Custody Cases, Courts Usually Consider: • “Best Interest of Child” Is Determining Factor • No “Single Factor” Decisions Are Appropriate • Stability is Important for Children – Any Proposed Change Requires Greater Justification Than Maintenance of Status Quo

  21. ANOTHER FAMILY ISSUE: PROTECTING BATTERED WOMEN • Historically, Women Have Been Victims of Battering by Their Husbands • Courts Have Been Reluctant to “Intervene” in Domestic Disputes  Men Have “Free Reign” • Women Have No Recourse in Courts  Have Killed Husbands in Defense • Q: Can Evidence of This Defense Pattern Be Used in Defending Women Accused of Killing a Batterer?

  22. BACKGROUND OFBATTERED WOMEN’S SYNDROME • The Pattern Psychological Experts Have Established … • Describes the Manner in Which an Abusive Husband Operates … • Its Effect on His Victim … • And the Manner in Which She Fights Back

  23. DEFININGBATTERED WOMEN’S SYNDROME • Women Know from Experience How Her Husband’s Battering Pattern Works … • Can Predict His Future Actions … • Know When He Is Likely to Attack Her Next • Know from Experience NO ONE (e.g., Police, Courts) Is Likely to Assist Her … • She Eventually Takes Action … Anticipating an Imminent Attack … She Attacks 1st & Kills Him • Had Generally NOT Been Accepted By Courts

  24. Q: CAN THIS BE USED AS DEFENSE IN COURT? • Had NOT Been Accepted by Several Courts • State v. Hodges(Kansas Sup Ct 1986) Changed This • Hodges Was 33 Yr Victim of Wife Abuse • Shot Husband & Claimed Self Defense • Defense Presented Testimony on “Battered Women’s Syndrome” – Stating Women Subjected to Years of Abuse Believe No One Else Will Help Them – Take Own Measures • Trial Court Rejected Defense Testimony

  25. STATE V. HODGES APPEAL • Hodges Was Convicted of Voluntary Manslaughter & Appealed to Kansas Sup. Ct. • Court Stated Expert Witness Testimony on Battered Women’s Syndrome Was Relevant, Should Have Been Allowed • Key Issue: Defining “Self-Defense”:Immediate Danger or Imminent Danger?

  26. KEY ISSUE: DEFINING “SELF-DEFENSE” • Immediate Danger: Narrower – Someone Is Holding a Gun to Your Head NOW – Impossible to Obtain an Intermediary • Imminent Danger: Broader – Individual At Risk of Immediate Danger – i.e., Get a Call – Person With Gun On the Way Over to Get You • Experts Say Battered Women Are Always in Imminent Danger • Changed Legal Meaning of Self Defense

  27. ANOTHER FAMILY ISSUE:MAINTAINING LIFE SUPPORT • Numerous Cases Re Right of a Patient (or Patient’s Family) to Remove Life Support • Not the Same as Physician Assisted Suicide • Questions: How Much Life Support Should Be Provided? • How Long Should Life Support Be Maintained? • Who Makes These Decisions? • Patient? Family? Hospital? Court?

  28. CRUZAN v DIR Of MO PUB HEALTH(U.S. Sup Ct, 1990) • Cruzan Was in Auto Accident, Vegetative State • Parents Wanted to Remove Life Support … • Hospital Refused – Parents Sued, Claimed Daughter Would Prefer • Courts Very Divided … • Mo. Ct. Claimed “No Clear, Convincing Evidence Daughter Would Prefer” • Sup. Ct. Supported State Court – State Could Require “Clear, Convincing Evidence”

  29. TERRI SCHIAVO CASE (Florida & U.S. Sup Ct., 2005) • Terri Had Been in Vegetative State for 15 Years • Husband Wanted to Remove Life Support, Claimed She Would Not Want This • Her Parents Insisted She Was “Responsive” • Florida Courts, Sup.Ct. Supported Removal • U.S. Congress Intervened – Insisted She Should Remain on Life Support, Numerous Measures to Enforce That Position • Finally Removed in March, 2005, & Died

  30. Q: WHO SHOULD MAKE THESE DECISIONS? • Many Commentators Claimed Congress, Pres. G.W. Bush, Gov. Job Bush Showed “a Total Disregard for Citizen’s Right to Be Left Alone” (M.A.Lawrence, freep.com, 2005) • Who Should Make These Decisions? What Kinds of Issues Should Be Considered? • General Assumption: Individual’s Wishes Should Be Considered – if They Can Be Known! • How to Determine Them?

  31. KEY LIFE SUPPORT ISSUES • What if Patient’s Wishes Not Clearly Known? • What if Patient Wants to Die & Hospital Disagrees? (Similar to Parent Wanting Child to Get Abortion Which She Does Not Want) • Should Cost of Care Be a Factor? • What About Level of Disability? • What If YOU Were the Disabled Person They Did Not Want to Care For? • Role of Disability Groups, Concerns Raised with Obamacare (Opponents’ Claim of “Death Panels”)

  32. CONCLUSION • Courts Have MANY Opinions On Family Issues • Generally STATE Issues – Since These Fall Under the “States’ Rights” (10th Amendment) of the U.S. Constitution • Occasionally U.S. Supreme Court Intervenes • Usually Only with Clear Issues of Individual State Discrimination (Prohibited By 14th Amendment) • EX: Palmore (Racial Discrimination); Sidoti (Disability Discrimination); Michael H. v. Gerald D. (Presumption of Paternity) • Schiavo Was a Clear Aberration!

More Related