70 likes | 81 Views
Ideas Forum: Summary and Discussion. Jerry Hughes 2009 C-Mod Ideas Forum April 6—8, 2009. Final tally = 137 Comparable to previous IF Proportion of ideas submitted under each topic also similar Contributions from collaborators: 27% up from FY07 Domestic, international contributions
E N D
Ideas Forum: Summary and Discussion Jerry Hughes 2009 C-Mod Ideas Forum April 6—8, 2009
Final tally = 137 Comparable to previous IF Proportion of ideas submitted under each topic also similar Contributions from collaborators: 27% up from FY07 Domestic, international contributions ITER Organization 28% of submissions were from students M.L. Reinke: 10% Proposals were organized into sessions (mostly) according to theme, and tagged with their author-identified topics Many valuable proposals were generated by this meeting Slide 2 of ?
Proposals were submitted under a long-standing topical categorization Slide 3 of ?
Is this the best task force arrangement? • Run campaigns driven in large part by high-level programmatic milestones • FY08 JOULE milestone influenced creation of a “thrust” on Rotation and Momentum Transport • Helpful in focusing effort in this area, optimizing run time and effort • Consider similarly motivated branching for the upcoming campaigns, based on joint facility milestones • FY09: Particle control and hydrogenic fuel retention • FY10: SOL heat transport • FY11: Pedestal predictive capability (joint facility/theory) • Other ideas for categorization? Slide 4 of ?
Ideas Forum Initial run-time allocations Topical and thrust groups (e.g. Transport) Optional “sub-topical” groups: (e.g. H-modes, ITBs) Prioritization + consolidation of similar proposals to the EPC Where do we go from here? • Remainder of April: Task Forces evaluate proposals to define priorities • New Ideas presented here • Ideas presented at previous Fora • Existing mini-proposals • Task force leaders will call open meetings for discussions • Videoconferencing should be available for collaborators • Ideas Forum e-mail list can be used for announcing these meetings (all current participants have been added) Slide 5 of ?
Ideas Forum Initial run-time allocations Topical and thrust groups (e.g. Transport) Optional “sub-topical” groups: (e.g. H-modes, ITBs) Prioritization + consolidation of similar proposals to the EPC Where do we go from here? • May:High priority proposals are expanded into mini-proposals • Current and new MPs will drive schedule during the upcoming run weeks • 10 in FY09, 13 in FY10, currently • Combination and compromise generally needed to optimize machine usage Slide 6 of ?
Final remarks • Quality (and quantity) of ideas has been impressive • Presentations will remain on-line indefinitely • Many thanks to all those who helped with organization • Task force coordinators • Jim Irby, Bob Granetz, Martin Greenwald, Amanda Hubbard, Brian LaBombard, Yijun Lin, Randy Wilson, Steve Wolfe • Session chairs • Igor Bespamyatnov, Paul Bonoli, Bruce Lipschultz, Bill Rowan, Steve Scott, Syun’ichi Shiraiwa, Dennis Whyte, Steve Wukitch • Jessica Coco, Josh Stillerman • Thanks to all who have submitted and presented proposals! Slide 7 of ?