1 / 35

SENCER Summer Institute August 2, 2012

Pressure from Below? How the New K-12 Science Education Standards Will Require a Very Different College Science Education Experience Martin Storksdieck. SENCER Summer Institute August 2, 2012. Changing Demands. STEM pathways and demand for STEM jobs

hanzila
Download Presentation

SENCER Summer Institute August 2, 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pressure from Below? How the New K-12 Science Education Standards WillRequire a Very Different College Science Education ExperienceMartin Storksdieck SENCER Summer Institute August 2, 2012

  2. Changing Demands • STEM pathways and demand for STEM jobs • Improvements of undergraduate STEM education • New pressures from K-12 • Need for different future teachers • Public understanding and engagement

  3. So why are we educating undergrads again? • Complete basic education and become a lifelong learner, a citizen and a (critical) consumer – (Miller, Falk) • Enculturate them into a system of learning and scholarship (within a discipline) • Convey “life skills” or 21st Century Skills • Deepen knowledge, skills and dispositions for future careers

  4. Skills for the 21st Century • Social skills (communication, reasoning, empathy, tolerance, etc.) • Learning skills (knowing how to learn, identity as learner, self-efficacy, self-reliance, etc.) • Thinking skills (creative and non-routine problem solving, creative thinking) • Decision skills (deciding under uncertainty, optimizing, commitment, etc.) • Implementation skills (persistence, resilience, risk-taking, harnessing and using resources, goal orientation, etc.)

  5. Challenges and Opportunities • Start at home: “teach your children well” = educate your undergrads better • DBER report • PCAST • Understand the connection to K-12 • Framework and Next Generation Science Standards • AP Redesign • Next Generation Science Teachers

  6. Challenges and Opportunities • CoSTEM and GAO: Federal STEM Education Inventory and Strategic Plan • If not now, then later – information, accountability and the changing marketplace of higher education • The tsunami is here: online and blended environments • Economies of scale? • Branding and choices – “are you being served?” • Be a good citizen: broader impact? • Collaborate • Integrate • Professionalize

  7. “Engage to Excel” Recommendations • Catalyze widespread adoption of empirically validated teaching practices. • Advocate and provide support for replacing standard laboratory courses with discovery-based research courses. • Launch a national experiment in postsecondary mathematics education to address the math-preparation gap. • Encourage partnerships among stakeholders to diversify pathways to STEM careers. • Create a Presidential council on STEM education with broad leadership.

  8. Discipline-Based Education Research Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering

  9. What is Discipline-Based Education Research? • Emerging from various parent disciplines • Investigates teaching and learning in a given discipline • Informed by and complementary to general research on human learning and cognition

  10. Contributions of DBER: Conceptual Understanding and Conceptual Change • In all disciplines, undergraduate students have incorrect ideas and beliefs about fundamental concepts. (Conclusion 6) • Students have particular difficulties with concepts that involve very large or very small temporal or spatial scales. (Conclusion 6) • Several types of instructional strategies have been shown to promote conceptual change.

  11. Contributions of DBER: Problem Solving and the Use of Representations • As novices in a domain, students are challenged by important aspects of the domain that can seem easy or obvious to experts. (Conclusion 7) • Students can be taught more expert-like problem-solving skills and strategies to improve their understanding of representations.

  12. Contributions of DBER: Research on Effective Instruction • Involving students actively in the learning process can enhance learning more effectively than lecturing. • Effective instruction includes a range of well-implemented, research-based approaches. (Conclusion 8)

  13. Future Directions for DBER: Translating DBERinto Practice • Available evidence suggests that DBER and related research have not yet prompted widespread changes in teaching practice among science and engineering faculty. (Conclusion 12) • Efforts to translate DBER and related research into practice are more likely to succeed if they: • are consistent with research on motivating adult learners, • include a deliberate focus on changing faculty conceptions about teaching and learning, • recognize the cultural and organizational norms of the department and institution, and • work to address those norms that pose barriers to change in teaching practice. (Conclusion 13)

  14. Future Directions for DBER: Recommendations for Translating DBER Into Practice • RECOMMENDATION: With support from institutions, disciplinary departments, and professional societies, faculty should adopt evidence-based teaching practices. • RECOMMENDATION: Institutions, disciplinary departments, and professional societies should work together to prepare current and future faculty to apply the findings of DBER and related research, and then include teaching effectiveness in evaluation processes and reward systems throughout faculty members’ careers. (Paraphrased)

  15. Problems in K-12 US Science Education

  16. Goals for US Science Education

  17. Key Ideas from Researchon Learning • Organize science learning(=standards) around coreideas and learningprogressions. • Study of science needs toreflect science.

  18. 1990s-2009 Phase I Phase II 1990s 7/2011 – 3/2013 1/2010 - 7/2011

  19. Major Educational Goals of the Framework Coherent investigation of core ideas across multiple years of school More seamless blending of practices with core ideas and crosscutting concepts Making science (education) relevant and significant for the learners

  20. Organized around core explanatory ideas “The next generation of standards and curricula … should be structured to identify a few core ideas in a discipline and elaborate how those ideas can be cumulatively developed over grades K-8.” (Taking Science to School, 2007, Rec. 2) • Criteria for core ideas • Disciplinary significance • Generative for understanding and investigation • Relevant to people’s interests, life experiences • Teachable and learnable from K to 12

  21. Organized in learning progressions Learning complex explanatory ideas… • …unfolds over time • …requires revisiting core ideas in new contexts that force students to extend them • …requires that students engage in tasks that force them to synthesize and apply ideas “Standards should be organized as progressions that support students’ learning over multiple grades. They should take into account how students’ command of the concepts, core ideas, and practices becomes more sophisticated over time with appropriate instructional experiences.” (NRC 2011, Rec 7)

  22. A Progression of Explanatory Ideas Molecular model of biochemical reactions for matter and energy in food. Chemical reactions model for matter and energy in food, drawing on particle model of matter and energy transfer model. Simple food model: food consumed or produced is made of matter and provides energy for organisms. General needs model: Organisms get what they need to survive from the environment.

  23. The Dimensions of the Framework What is new? Organized around core explanatory ideas Organized in learning progressions Key role of scientific practices Crosscutting Concepts Core Ideas Practices

  24. Science and Engineering Practices 1. Asking questions (science) and defining problems (engineering) 2. Developing and using models 3. Planning and carrying out investigations 4. Analyzing and interpreting data 5. Using mathematics and computational thinking 6. Developing explanations (science) and designing solutions (engineering) 7. Engaging in argument 8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information

  25. Cross-cutting Elements such as: Patterns, similarity, and diversity Cause and effect Scale, proportion, and quantity Systems and system models Energy and matter: flows, cycles and conservation Form and function Stability and change

  26. A core idea for K-12 science instruction is a scientific idea that: Has broad importance across multiple science or engineering disciplines or is a key organizing concept of a single discipline Provides a key tool for understanding or investigating more complex ideas and solving problems Relates to the interests and life experiences of students or can be connected to societal or personal concerns that require scientific or technical knowledge Is teachable and learnable over multiple grades at increasing levels of depth and sophistication

  27. Creating performance expectations from core idea + practice Core idea: Matter and energy in organisms (grade 8): Plants, algae, and many microorganisms use the energy from light to make sugars (food) from carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and water through the process of photosynthesis, which also releases oxygen. These sugars can be used immediately or stored for growth or later use. Animals obtain food from eating plants or eating other animals. Within individual organisms, food moves through a series of chemical reactions in which it is broken down and rearranged to form new molecules, to support growth or to release energy. In most animals and plants oxygen reacts with carbon-containing molecules (sugars) to provide energy and produce waste carbon-dioxide… Practices: Developing explanations, argument from evidence Performance expectation: Students construct and defend an explanation for why the air a human breathes out contains a lower proportion of oxygen than the air he or she breathed in. The explanation needs to address where in the body the oxygen was used, how it was used, and how it was transported there.

  28. NGSS Middle School Sample Construct and use models to explain that atoms combine to form new substances of varying complexity in terms of the number of atoms and repeating subunits. Plan investigations togenerate evidence supporting the claim that one pure substance can be distinguished from another based on characteristic properties. Use a simulation or mechanical model to determine the effect on the temperature and motion of atoms and molecules of different substances when thermal energy is added to or removed from the substance. Construct an argument that explains the effect of adding or removing thermal energy to a pure substance in different phases and during a phase change in terms of atomic and molecular motion.

  29. Summary of Important Changes

  30. Disciplinary Core Ideas Science and Engineering Practices Crosscutting Concepts

  31. “So these kids will start becoming the demanding customers of the postsecondary learning factories we refer to as colleges and universities”

  32. Find out more! www.nap.edu www.nas.edu/bose http://www.nextgenscience.org

More Related