1 / 79

Current Legal Issues in Natural Gas Development

Current Legal Issues in Natural Gas Development. Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center Ross H. Pifer, J.D., LL.M., Director. Overview of Presentation. Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center. Current Natural Gas Litigation Legislative Proposals Basic Pennsylvania Laws

henry
Download Presentation

Current Legal Issues in Natural Gas Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Current Legal Issues in Natural Gas Development Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center Ross H. Pifer, J.D., LL.M., Director

  2. Overview of Presentation Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Current Natural Gas Litigation • Legislative Proposals • Basic Pennsylvania Laws • Oil and Gas Act • Oil and Gas Conservation Law • Dormant Oil and Gas Act

  3. Natural Gas Litigation Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center Lease Termination / PA Minimum Royalty Act Eminent Domain Environmental / Use of Surface Estate Oil and Gas Act Preemption

  4. Lease Termination Cases Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Middle District of Pennsylvania • Kropa v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. (3/25/08) • Lauschle v. The Keeton Group (10/9/08) • Western District of Pennsylvania • Frederick v. Range Resources (10/17/08) • Susquehanna Co. Court of Common Pleas • Kilmer v. Elexco Land Services, Inc., and Southwestern Energy Production Co.

  5. Lease Termination Cases Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center Critical statute is 59 P.S. § 33 – Guarantee of Minimum Royalties Primary Issue – Does reduction of royalty for post-production costs create a problem with minimum royalty statute?

  6. 58 P.S. § 33 – Guarantee of Minimum Royalties Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center A lease or other such agreement conveying the right to remove or recover oil, natural gas or other designation from lessor to lessee shall not be valid if such lease does not guarantee the lessor at least one-eighth royalty of all oil, natural gas or gas of other designations removed or recovered from the subject real property.

  7. Definition of Royalty Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center Royalty is undefined in minimum royalty statute. “Royalty Owner” is defined in Oil and Gas Conservation Law. “Royalty Interest” is defined in Dormant Oil and Gas Act. Industry practice

  8. Oil and Gas Conservation Law Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center Royalty Owner – “. . . An owner of an interest in an oil and gas lease which entitles him to share in the production of the oil and gas under the lease or the proceeds therefrom without obligating him to pay any costs under the lease.”

  9. Dormant Oil and Gas Act Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center Royalty Interest – “An interest in an oil and gas lease which entitles the owner to share in the production of the oil and gas under the lease or proceeds from a lease without the obligation to pay any costs of production under the lease.”

  10. Kropa v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Facts • Five year lease for $25 per acre executed on March 7, 2006 • Fraudulent inducement? • Assertion that company “will never pay more than $25 per acre.”

  11. Kropa v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Procedural History • Removed to federal court • Motion to Dismiss pending • Argument heard on September 16, 2008 • Additional briefing on integration issue

  12. Kropa v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Issues • Contract integration • Minimum Royalty Act • Appropriate remedy

  13. Lauschle v. The Keeton Group Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center Case filed by over 100 plaintiffs who own 18,200 acres. Lease agreements were executed in 2005 and 2006. Motion to Dismiss was filed on November 24, 2008. Oral argument is scheduled for May 29, 2009.

  14. Frederick v. Range Resources Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center Plaintiffs have received and continue to receive royalties from lease agreements in question. If plaintiffs are successful, what is appropriate remedy?

  15. Kilmer v. Elexco Land Service Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Susquehanna Co. Court of Common Pleas • March 3, 2009 – Order ruled in favor of gas company • March 16, 2009 – Opinion • Notice of Appeal filed with Superior Court on March 13, 2009 • Petition for Extraordinary Relief filed with Supreme Court on April 6, 2009.

  16. Eminent Domain Litigation Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Steckman Ridge • Underground storage fields in Bedford County • Will limit drilling into Marcellus Shale formation • FERC has granted certificate of public convenience. • On February 27, 2009, Steckman granted injunction to obtain immediate access onto properties. • Trial has been scheduled for June 15, 2009.

  17. Environmental Litigation Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • POGAM v. USFS • POGAM and Allegheny Forest Alliance object to the Revised Forest Plan issued in March 2007. • Plan included restrictions on OGM development that were not subject to public comment. • Remedy sought is vacation of plan and remand to require public comment.

  18. Environmental Litigation Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics v. USFS • Plaintiffs claim violations of NEPA for failure to require EIS or EA prior to issuance of Notices to Proceed. • Case was filed on November 20, 2008. • Case was settled on April 9, 2009.

  19. Environmental Litigation Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Duhring v. USFS • Plaintiff owns interest in mineral estate and seeks access to surface estate to develop resource. • Notice to Proceed contained several conditions. • On March 6, 2009, court dismissed some claims pursuant to ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment. • Trial has been scheduled for February 1, 2010.

  20. Environmental Litigation Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Belden & Blake Corp. v. DCNR • Petitioner holds OGM rights beneath Oil Creek State Park. • DCNR imposed conditions for use of surface estate: • Coordination agreement • Performance bond • Double stumpage fees

  21. Environmental Litigation Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Belden & Blake Corp. v. DCNR • Commonwealth Court ruled that DCNR had no authority to impose conditions. • Supreme Court heard oral argument on April 14, 2008.

  22. Use of Surface Estate Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • What is reasonable use? • Is reasonable use impacted by horizontal drilling techniques? • What are options for owner of surface estate? • Object to permit • Surface use agreement • Court injunction

  23. Oil and Gas Act Preemption Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Supreme Court opinions • Borough of Oakmont • Restriction on oil and gas wells in R-1 zoning district was not preempted by Oil and Gas Act. • Salem Township • Surface and land development ordinance was preempted by Oil and Gas Act. • Pending before Commonwealth Court • Nockamixon Township • Argument was held on February 23, 2009.

  24. Natural Gas Legislative Proposals Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Amendment of Clean and Green • Goal: Establish uniformity statewide • Issues: • Similar treatment to cell phone towers? • Severance of surface estate • Well sited on adjacent property

  25. Legislative Proposals Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Severance tax • County Assessment Law • Surface owners rights • Expand Oil and Gas Conservation Law to encompass Marcellus Shale • Reporting requirements

  26. Pennsylvania’s Oil and Gas Laws Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • 58 P.S. §§ 1-701.7 • Chapter 1: Oil and Gas Wells • Chapter 2: Test of Illuminating Oil • Chapter 5: Interstate Conservation Compact • Chapter 7: Oil and Gas Conservation Law • Chapter 8: Underground Storage Act • Chapter 9: Pennsylvania Used Oil Recycling Act • Chapter 10: Coal and Gas Resource Coordination Act • Chapter 11: Oil and Gas Act • Chapter 12: Dormant Oil and Gas Act

  27. Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Act Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Organization of Oil and Gas Act • Chapter 1: Preliminary Provisions • Chapter 2: General Requirements • Chapter 3: Underground Gas Storage • Chapter 4: Eminent Domain • Chapter 5: Enforcement and Remedies • Chapter 6: Miscellaneous Provisions

  28. Preliminary Provisions Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Declaration of Purpose – Section 102 • Permit optimal development . . . consistent with protection of health, safety, environment, and property; • Protect safety of employees and facilities; • Protect safety and property of those near development; and • Protect natural resources

  29. General Requirements Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Permitting Requirements – Section 201 • DEP permit is required prior to drilling. • Notice must be provided to: • Surface owner; • Surface landowner or water purveyors who have water supply within 1000 feet of proposed well location; and • Owner / operator of underlying coal seams.

  30. General Requirements Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Permit Objections – Section 202 • Surface owner has right to object to permit. • Objection must be filed with DEP within 15 days of receipt of notice and plat. • Objection can be based upon improper location of well or inaccurate information in permit application. • Coal mine owner / operator also has 15 days to file objection.

  31. General Requirements Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Permitting Requirements – Section 201 • DEP has 45 days to issue permit. • Time period can be extended for additional 15 days. • Permit can be rejected due to: • Issuance of permit would violate law; • Incomplete application; • Unresolved objection from coal mine; • Improper bonding; • Violations on other wells.

  32. General Requirements Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Permitting Requirements – Section 201 • Well must be drilled as indicated on permit application. • Permit generally expires after one year if drilling does not occur. • Permit remains in force until the well is plugged. • Permit cannot be transferred without DEP approval.

  33. General Requirements Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Well Locations Restrictions – Section 205 • Wells cannot be drilled: • Within 200 feet from building or water well; • Within 100 feet from spring, stream, body of water, or wetland larger than one acre. • Waiver or variance can be granted from distance requirements. • DEP may impose conditions to protect people, property, and waters. • DEP is to consider impact of well on public resources when granting permit.

  34. General Requirements Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Bonding Requirements – Section 215 • Bond must be obtained after submitting permit application but before drilling. • Bond is conditioned upon faithfully performing all of the drilling, water supply replacement, restoration, and plugging requirements of the Act. • Failure to comply with Act causes forfeiture of bond funds to Well Plugging Restricted Revenue Account.

  35. General Requirements Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Ground Water Protection – Section 207 • Casing is required when: • Drilling through fresh water strata; • Certain coal seams. • Brines must be disposed of in compliance with Clean Streams Law.

  36. General Requirements Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Protection of Water Supplies – Section 208 • Well operator must restore or replace a water supply that is polluted or diminished. • Presumption of Liability • Well is presumed to have caused pollution or diminution of water supply located within 1000 feet of well. • Presumption can be rebutted by performing a predrill test of water supply. • Presumption also is rebutted if landowner refuses permission to perform a predrill test.

  37. General Requirements Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Reporting Requirements – Section 212 • Completion report must be filed within 30 days of the completion of drilling. • Annual report containing production data must be filed with DEP. • Report is kept confidential for five years. • DEP has authority to request industry logs and other information.

  38. General Requirements Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Well Site Restoration – Section 206 • Surface estate must be restored from disturbances caused by drilling activities. • Well operator must follow erosion and sediment control plan at all times during drilling. • Equipment must be removed and well site restored within nine months of completion of activity. • Time period can be extended for six months • Equipment can be stored on-site with landowner permission.

  39. General Requirements Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Registration Requirements – Section 203 • Unpermitted wells must be registered with DEP. • Abandoned wells are to be reported to DEP so that well can be considered as an orphan well.

  40. General Requirements Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Plugging Requirements – Section 210 • Plugging stops the “vertical flow of fluids or gas within the well bore.” • Well must be plugged prior to abandonment. • Operator must provide DEP with notice of plugging to afford DEP with the opportunity to be present at time of plugging.

  41. General Requirements Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Coal Operator Responsibilities – Section 214 • Coal operators who are removing coal within 500 feet of well must file maps with DEP. • Generally, coal operators can remove coal up to 150 feet from well after notifying DEP.

  42. Underground Gas Storage Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • General Gas Storage Reservoir Operations – Section 303 • Operators must attempt to locate all wells drilled into the reservoir. • All known wells must be plugged and reconditioned.

  43. Underground Gas Storage Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Reporting Requirements for Gas Storage Operations – Section 301 • Storage operators with a reservoir within 10,000 feet of a coal mine must file maps with DEP. • All storage operators must provide DEP with municipality in which their reservoir is located. • DEP may request maps detailing the specific boundaries of reservoir.

  44. Underground Gas Storage Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Reporting Requirements for Coal Mine Operations – Section 302 • Coal mine owners / operators must file a map with DEP. • A coal mine that has been pierced by a well must file a map with DEP each year. • Coal mines have notice and reporting obligations if their mines come within 10,000 or 2,000 feet from a gas storage reservoir.

  45. Underground Gas Storage Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Inspection of Facilities and Records – Section 305 • Coal mines and gas storage operators can inspect records and facilities of the other. • Parties can request additional information from the other party (Section 306).

  46. Eminent Domain – Section 401 Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Limited Right of Eminent Domain for Gas Storage Reservoir • Cannot be exercised until: • Original recoverable oil or gas reserves have been depleted by at least 80%; and • Condemnor has acquired right to store gas underlying at least 75% of proposed storage area.

  47. Enforcement and Remedies Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Conferences – Section 501 • Any party “having a direct interest in the subject matter” may request that DEP convene a conference. • DEP representative shall be at conference. • Any agreement reached at conference shall be effective unless rejected by DEP within 10 days after conference.

  48. Enforcement and Remedies Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Enforcement Orders – Section 503 • DEP has authority to suspend or revoke permit for violations of Act or other law such as Clean Streams Law. • DEP must provide written notice prior to suspension or revocation • Operator can request conference prior to determination and appeal to Environmental Hearing Board within 30 days after determination.

  49. Enforcement and Remedies Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Restraining Violations – Section 504 • DEP can pursue injunction before: • Court of Common Pleas • Commonwealth Court • Injunction can be sought to stop or prevent violation of Act.

  50. Enforcement and Remedies Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center • Criminal Penalties – Section 505 • A violation is a summary offense. • Fine not more than $300 • Imprisonment not more than 90 days • A willful violation is a misdemeanor offense. • Fine not more than $5,000 • Imprisonment not more than one year • Each day is considered to be a separate offense.

More Related