1 / 14

Blended Offerings

Blended Offerings. A plan for Vatterott College, Memphis-Dividend. Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University. Blended general education courses: A feasible solution to challenges. Blended general education courses: Memphis-Dividend programs. Our students. Limited digital skills

iren
Download Presentation

Blended Offerings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Blended Offerings A plan for Vatterott College, Memphis-Dividend Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

  2. Blended general education courses:A feasible solution to challenges Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

  3. Blended general education courses:Memphis-Dividend programs Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

  4. Our students • Limited digital skills • Limited access to computers • Limited access to internet • Limited motivation to change Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

  5. Blended learning:The research • Higher student satisfaction with blended courses • Equivalent or better learning outcomes • Higher student engagement • Institutional prestige • Reasonable costs Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

  6. Blended learning:Needs • Scheduling • Classroom access • Faculty • Laptops • Wireless access • Technical support Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

  7. Blended learning: NeedsSchedule, faculty, classrooms • Three meetings a term • Use of existing available classrooms • New instructors Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

  8. Blended learning: NeedsAccess to computers and the internet • Laptops for all students in blended classes • Wireless access at the college Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

  9. Blended learning: NeedsTechnical support • 7 a.m. – 11 p.m. shared telephone technical support Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

  10. Blendedcourses:A practical solutionto needs at Memphis-Dividend Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

  11. ? Questions? Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

  12. References Ashby, J., Sadera, W. A., & McNary, S. W. (2011). Comparing student success between developmental math courses offered online, blended, and face-to-face. Journal Of Interactive Online Learning, 10(3), 128-140. Dray, B. J., Lowenthal, P. R., Miszkiewicz, M. J., Ruiz-Primo, M., & Marczynski, K. (2011). Developing an instrument to assess student readiness for online learning: a validation study. Distance Education, 32(1), 29-47. doi:10.1080/01587919.2011.565496 Greenhow, C., Walker, J. D., & Seongdok, K. (2009). Millennial Learners and Net-Savvy Teens? Examining Internet Use among Low-Income Students. Journal Of Computing In Teacher Education, 26(2), 63-68. Hsieh, J.J.P.-A., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2008). Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 97–126. Retrieved from http://www.misq.org/ Kerr, M. S., Rynearson, K., & Kerr, M. C. (2006). Student characteristics for online learning success. Internet & Higher Education, 9(2), 91-105. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.03.002 Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

  13. References (continued) Luehmann, A. (2009). Accessing resources for identity development by urban students and teachers: foregrounding context. Cultural Studies Of Science Education, 4(1), 51-66. doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9139-4 Melton, B., Graf, H., & Chopak-Foss, J. (2009). Achievement and Satisfaction in Blended Learning versus Traditional General Health Course Designs. International Journal For The Scholarship Of Teaching & Learning, 3(1), 1-13. O’Brien, D., & Scharber, C. (2008). Digital literacies go to school: Potholes and possibilities. Journal Of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1), 66-68. Owen, J., & Kuan, K. (2010). Paving the Way for True Education Reform in Memphis. Tennessee Center for Policy Research. Retrieved from http://www.tennesseepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/Paving-the-Way-for-True-Education-Reform-in-Memphis.pdf Percival, J., & Percival, N. (2009). A case of a laptop learning campus: how do technology choices affect perceptions?. ALT-J: Research In Learning Technology, 17(3), 173-186. doi:10.1080/09687760903247633 Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

  14. References (continued) Selwyn, N. (2011). Digitally distanced learning: A study of international distance learners’ (non)use of technology. Distance Education, 32(1), 85–99. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2011.565500 U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.) Vatterott College-Memphis. Retrieved from http://ope.ed.gov/accreditation/InstAccrDetails.aspx?756e697469643d3136393333362663616d70757349643d30267264743d352f362f3230313220373a32353a313920504d van Dijk, J. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements, and shortcomings. Poetics, 34, 221–235. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004 Vatterott Career College-Memphis Dividend Drive. (n.d.) In EduMojo. Retrieved from http://www.edumojo.com/college/collegedetails/school/Vatterott+College+Memphis__2655+Dividend+Drive,+Memphis,+Tennessee+38132__TN__440873 Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on Blended Learning in Higher Education. International Journal On E-Learning, 6(1), 81-94. Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

More Related