1 / 6

Overview of 2010 Geospatial Summit

Overview of 2010 Geospatial Summit. Juliana P. Blackwell Director, National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service, NOAA. Geospatial Summit, April 13-14, 2015. Highlights. Lessons from the Past Modernizing the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS) Geopotential Datum – Replacing NAVD 88

jnolte
Download Presentation

Overview of 2010 Geospatial Summit

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overview of 2010 Geospatial Summit Juliana P. Blackwell Director, National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service, NOAA Geospatial Summit, April 13-14, 2015

  2. Highlights Lessons from the Past Modernizing the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS) Geopotential Datum – Replacing NAVD 88 Geometric Datum – Replacing NAD 83 Perspectives and Feedback 2

  3. Lessons from the Past Expect years of effort Requires a lot of geodetic expertise Expect slow-adopters and no-adopters Users care about differentialaccuracy more than absolute Communicate, communicate, communicate Develop support tools in advance 3

  4. North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) Destroyed marks, poor locations, no monitoring, bias, tilt No continent-wide consistency Re-leveling is expensive, doesn’t solve root issues Future: GPS+Geoid! Role of passive marks demoted North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) Non-geocentric, misaligned with satellite orbits Legally binding in 48 states! Built from Bilby passive to GPS passive to CORS Too many “realizations” Future: CORS rules! Role of passive marks demoted Future: Plate-fixed? Remains an open question Modernizing the NSRS 4

  5. Perspectives and Feedback Panel Q&A and End User Feedback Many users desired some form of “fixed” coordinates Need for passive control varies from “none” to “critical” Volume of federal NAD 83/NAVD 88 geospatial data is tremendous, but almost all digital or becoming digital Traceability back to NAD 83 or NAVD 88 very important Consistency of the NSRS across decades is important Summary Cautious optimism and some excitement Adoption of true time-dependent coordinates will be slow, but some users need this information. 5

  6. Thank you 6

More Related