1 / 58

Lecture 4 Quantum Phase Transitions and the microscopic drivers of structural evolution

Lecture 4 Quantum Phase Transitions and the microscopic drivers of structural evolution. Quantum phase transitions and structural evolution in nuclei. Increasing valence nucleon number. E. 1. 2. 3. 4. β. Quantum phase transitions in equilibrium shapes of nuclei with N , Z.

karltaylor
Download Presentation

Lecture 4 Quantum Phase Transitions and the microscopic drivers of structural evolution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture 4Quantum Phase Transitions and the microscopic drivers of structural evolution

  2. Quantum phase transitions and structural evolution in nuclei

  3. Increasing valence nucleon number E 1 2 3 4 β Quantum phase transitions in equilibrium shapes of nuclei with N, Z Potential as function of the ellipsoidal deformation of the nucleus Transitional Rotor Vibrator For nuclear shape phase transitions the control parameter is nucleon number

  4. Nuclear Shape Evolutionb - nuclear ellipsoidal deformation (b=0 is spherical) Vibrational RegionTransitional RegionRotational Region Critical Point New analytical solutions, E(5) and X(5) R4/2= ~2.0 R4/2= 3.33 Few valence nucleonsMany valence Nucleons

  5. X(5) E E 1 2 3 4 β   Critical Point Symmetries First Order Phase Transition – Phase Coexistence Energy surface changes with valence nucleon number Bessel equation Iachello

  6. Casten and Zamfir

  7. Comparison of relative energies with X(5)

  8. Based on idea of Mark Caprio

  9. Flat potentials in b validated by microscopic calculations Li et al, 2009

  10. Shimizu et al More neutron holes Potential energy surfaces of 136,134,132Ba 100keV 134Ba 132Ba 136Ba <H> × × × minimum <HPJ=0> × × × (Nn,Np)= (-2,6) (-4,6) (-6,6)

  11. Isotope shifts Charlwood et al, 2009 Li et al, 2009

  12. Look at other N=90 nulei

  13. Where else? In a few minutes I will show some slides that will allow you to estimate the structure of any nucleus by multiplying and dividing two numbers each less than 30 (or, if you prefer, you can get the same result from 10 hours of supercomputer time)

  14. Where we stand on QPTs • Muted phase transitional behavior seems established from a number of observables. • Critical point solutions (CPSs) provide extremely simple, parameter-free (except for scales) descriptions that are surprisingly good given their simplicity. • Extensive work exists on refinements to these CPSs. • Microscopic theories have made great strides, and validate the basic idea of flat potentials in b at the critical point. They can also now provide specific predictions for key observables.

  15. Proton-neutron interactions A crucial key to structural evolution

  16. Microscopic perspective Valence Proton-Neutron Interaction Development of configuration mixing, collectivity and deformation – competition with pairing Changes in single particle energies and magic numbers Partial history: Goldhaber and de Shalit (1953); Talmi (1962); Federman and Pittel ( late 1970’s); Casten et al (1981); Heyde et al (1980’s); Nazarewicz, Dobacewski et al (1980’s); Otsuka et al( 2000’s) and many others.

  17. Sn – Magic: no valence p-n interactions Both valence protons and neutrons Two effects Configuration mixing, collectivity Changes in single particle energies and shell structure

  18. Concept of monopole interaction changing shell structure and inducing collectivity

  19. A simple signature of phase transitions MEDIATEDby sub-shell changesBubbles and Crossing patterns

  20. Seeing structural evolution Different perspectives can yield different insights Mid-sh. magic Onset of deformation as a phase transition mediated by a change in shell structure Onset of deformation “Crossing” and “Bubble” plots as indicators of phase transitional regions mediated by sub-shell changes

  21. Often, esp. in exotic nuclei, R4/2 is not available. A easier-to-obtain observable, E(21+), in the form of 1/ E(21+), can substitute equally well

  22. Masses and Nucleonic Interactions Masses: • Shell structure: ~ 1 MeV • Quantum phase transitions: ~ 100s keV • Collective effects ~ 100 keV • Interaction filters ~ 10-15 keV Total mass/binding energy:Sum of all interactions Mass differences:Separation energies shell structure, phase transitions Double differences of masses:Interaction filters Macro Micro

  23. Measurements of p-n Interaction Strengths dVpn Average p-n interaction between last protons and last neutrons Double Difference of Binding Energies Vpn (Z,N)  =  ¼ [ {B(Z,N) - B(Z, N-2)}  -  {B(Z-2, N) - B(Z-2, N-2)} ] Ref: J.-y. Zhang and J. D. Garrett

  24. Valence p-n interaction: Can we measure it? Vpn (Z,N)  =  ¼[ {B(Z,N) - B(Z, N-2)} -  {B(Z-2, N) - B(Z-2, N-2)} ] - - - p n p n p n p n - Int. of last two n with Z protons, N-2 neutrons and with each other Int. of last two n with Z-2 protons, N-2 neutrons and with each other Empirical average interaction of last two neutrons with last two protons

  25. 82 50 82 126   Orbit dependence of p-n interactions Low j, high n High j, low n

  26. Z  82 , N < 126 Z  82 , N < 126 3 1 1 2 3 2 1 126 82 82 50   Z > 82 , N < 126 Z > 82 , N > 126 Low j, high n High j, low n

  27. 208Hg

  28. Can we extend these ideas beyond magic regions?

  29. 126 82 LOW j, HIGH n HIGH j, LOW n 50 82 Away from closed shells, these simple arguments are too crude. But some general predictions can be made p-n interaction is short range similar orbits give largest p-n interaction Largest p-n interactions if proton and neutron shells are filling similar orbits

  30. 82 50 82 126   Empirical p-n interaction strengths indeed strongest along diagonal. Empirical p-n interaction strengths stronger in like regions than unlike regions. Low j, high n High j, low n New mass data on Xe isotopes at ISOLTRAP – ISOLDE CERN Neidherr et al., PR C, 2009

  31. p-n interactions and the evolution of structure Direct correlation of observed growth rates of collectivity with empirical p-n interaction strengths

  32. Exploiting the p-n interaction • Estimating the structure of any nucleus in a trivial way (example: finding candidat6e for phase transitional behavior) • Testing microscopic calculations

  33. A simple microscopic guide to the evolution of structure The NpNn Scheme and the P-factor If the p-n interaction is so important it should be possible to use it to simplify our understanding of how structure evolves. Instead of plotting observables against N or Z or A, plot them against a measure of the p-n interaction. Assume all p-n interactions are equal. How many are there: Answer:Np xNn

  34. Compeition between the p-n interaction and pairing: the P-factor General p – n strengths For heavy nuclei can approximate them as all constant. Total number of p – n interactions is NpNn Pairing: each nucleon interacts with ONLY one other – the nucleon of the same type in the same orbit but orbiting in the opposite direction. So, the total number of pairing interactions scales as the number of valence nucleonss.

  35. What is the locus of candidates for X(5) NpNn p – n = P  Np + Nn pairing p-n / pairing p-n interactions per pairing interaction Pairing int. ~ 1.5 MeV, p-n ~ 300 keV Hence takes ~ 5 p-n int. to compete with one pairing int. P ~ 5

  36. Comparison with the data

  37. W. Nazarewicz, M. Stoitsov, W. Satula Realistic Calculations Microscopic Density Functional Calculations with Skyrme forces and different treatments of pairing

  38. Agreement is remarkable. Especially so since these DFT calculations reproduce known masses only to ~ 1 MeV – yet the double difference embodied in dVpn allows one to focus on sensitive aspects of the wave functions that reflect specific correlations

  39. The new Xe mass measurements at ISOLDE give a new test of the DFT

  40. dVpn (DFT – Two interactions) SLY4MIX SKPDMIX

  41. So, now what? Go out and measure all 4000 unknown nuclei? No way!!! Choose those that tell us some physics, use simple paradigms to get started, use more sophisticated ones to probe more deeply, and study the new physics that emerges. Overall, we understand these beasts (nuclei) only very superficially. Why do this? Ultimately, the goal is to take this quantal, many-body system interacting with at least two forces, consuming 99.9% of visible matter, and understand its structure and symmetries, and its microscopic underpinnings from a fundamental coherent framework. We are progressing. It is your generation that will get us there.

  42. The EndThanks for listening

  43. Special Thanks to: • Iachello and Arima • Dave Warner, Victor Zamfir, Burcu Cakirli, Stuart Pittel, Kris Heyde and others i9 didn’t have time to type just before the lecture

More Related