1 / 43

The Value of Urban Design

The Value of Urban Design. The Impact of Suburban Redevelopment on Sense of Community. Mariela Alfonzo, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Fellow Metropolitan Institute Virginia Tech, Alexandria , VA. Nostalgia for Community. Many lament the “loss” of a sense of community in America Putnam: Bowling Alone

lan
Download Presentation

The Value of Urban Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Value of Urban Design The Impact of Suburban Redevelopment on Sense of Community Mariela Alfonzo, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Fellow Metropolitan Institute Virginia Tech, Alexandria , VA

  2. Nostalgia for Community • Many lament the “loss” of a sense of community in America • Putnam: Bowling Alone • Kunstler: Geography of Nowhere • New Urbanists • Planning officials • Academic literature • General assumption that community has waned

  3. “Building” Community • New Urbanists - “Build it and they will come” • Towards an Architecture of Community • Compact, dense, walkable neighborhoods create sense of community • Assumptions about the built environment and sense of community

  4. Selling Community • Developers are “heeding” calls for community • Community as a “brand” • Garnering city support and citizen “buy-in” for new projects

  5. Marketing Community • “I want to build something that enhances andcreates community.” • Business Leader, 2005; John Kain, Developer, North Hills Raleigh • “It's going to create a sense of community for the fastest-growing area in the metro area.'' • Rocky Mountain News, 2003; New Aurora, CO Mall

  6. Marketing Community • “Miramar Town Center is significant for the entire area…this is a unique opportunity to bring a sense of community to a very linear city…” • South Florida CEO, 2005 • “These ‘smart growth’ or ‘mixed-use’ projects try to build a sense of community by putting more of life's activities at one site while reducing the number of trips on congested roads.” • Star Tribune, MN, 2002

  7. Mixing it up…A Recipe for Community? • Redeveloping dying malls • 1 in 5 US malls are under performing • Mixed-use = most popular redevelopment approach • Promising more than a cure for cities’ economic woes • Mixed-use being sold as a way to increase sense of community

  8. Is Mixed-use the missing ingredient? • Effectiveness of mixed-use approach is unknown • Social impacts are not understood • Existing approach is formulaic, based on other project types

  9. Can’t Afford an Experiment… • Mixed-use Redevelopment is expensive • From $50 to $500 mil per project • Increasing number of failing malls • Est. total redevelopment costs > $11 billion • Public and private funding • Sense of community = selling point • Need to establish design guidelines specific to mall redevelopment

  10. Research Question • Do differences in the urban design changes implemented as part of the mixed-use mall redevelopment impact sense of community (SOC) ?

  11. Past Research • Suburban revitalization is new phenomenon • Research on revitalization focused on urban communities (downtown, inner city) • Difficult to generalize from urban to suburban • Sense of community literature focused on individual and group level correlates • Age, length of residency, home ownership, “neighborliness,” etc.

  12. Past Research, Cont. • Few studies investigate how built environment affects sense of community • Not within the context of revitalization • Provide support for link between urban design and sense of community • Festinger, Appleyard (social interaction) • “Traditional” vs. “modern” neighborhood (Lund, 2002; Plas & Lewis, 1996) • “Gated” vs. “Non-gated” (Wilson-Doenges, 2000) • Land-use mix, apartment layouts (Nasar & Julian, 1995) • Oldenberg (third places)

  13. Attachment S e n s e o f Com mu n i t y Attitudes Functional R e d e v e l o p m e n t Emotional Distance Behavioral Factors Retail Walking Site Design Socio-demographics Social Interaction Satisfaction Neighborhood Built Environment Aesthetic Functional Publicness

  14. Methodology • Comparative Case Study • 3 redeveloped malls vs. 3 currently non-redeveloped malls • Compared residents living within ½ mile of each site • Urban design of redeveloped malls varied by: • Land-use mix, retail mix, and site layout

  15. Research Methods • Survey • Random sample of 850 adults (18 and over) within ½ mile of sites • McMillan & Chavis (1986) SCI • Avg response rate - 17.6%; range (9.1% - 29.4%) • Urban design inventory • Irvine Minnesota Inventory (2006) • Random sample of blocks (30%) within ½ mile of sites • On-site behavioral observations • Focus group interviews with residents • Informal interviews of key players

  16. CityCenter Englewood

  17. CCE Site Plan

  18. Santana Row

  19. SR Site Plan

  20. North Hills – Raleigh, NC

  21. NH Site Plan

  22. Design Matters

  23. SOC: North Hills > EnglewoodSantana Row = North Hills

  24. SOC: Englewood = Santana Row

  25. Site Built Environment related to SOC

  26. SOC & Redevelopment are Indirectly Related

  27. Individual Behaviors related to SOC

  28. Attachment related to SOC

  29. Satisfaction related to SOC

  30. Mediators and Redevelopment

  31. Redev --> Mediators --> SOC

  32. Key Findings • “Type” of Redevelopment/Site Built Environment related to Sense of Community • North Hills (SOC) > CityCenter Englewood (SOC) • More “positive” Built Environment = Higher Sense of Community • Retail mix and Land use mix may also impact SOC (attachment)

  33. Key Findings • Site Built Environment notNeighborhood Built Environment related to Sense of Community • Index vs. Categorical measurements • More than just the presence of Mixed-Use

  34. Design Implications • Address Built Environment features related to the mediators of SOC • Indirect relationship between Sense of Community and Redevelopment • Design of Mixed-use site important • More than just Mixed-Use • Retail mix, Land-use mix, Layout, Gathering Places

  35. Theoretical Implications (The Big Picture) • Transforming the suburbs • Mixed-Use centers = More than just another trip to the mall • Redefining suburban living • “Urban vitality” or dynamic

  36. Thank You!

More Related