1 / 29

IP Measurements at PEP-II with BaBar

IP Measurements at PEP-II with BaBar. M.Weaver, C.O’Grady, J.Thompson (SLAC), W.Kozanecki (Saclay), B.Viaud (Montreal) Super-B III Workshop June 15, 2006. IP Characterization. BaBar’s tracking resolution and prime venue allow measurement of important parameters at the IP

lea
Download Presentation

IP Measurements at PEP-II with BaBar

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IP Measurements at PEP-IIwith BaBar M.Weaver, C.O’Grady, J.Thompson (SLAC), W.Kozanecki (Saclay), B.Viaud (Montreal) Super-B III Workshop June 15, 2006

  2. IP Characterization • BaBar’s tracking resolution and prime venue allow measurement of important parameters at the IP • Use to measure production vertices and boost vector angles e- beam (resolution) Production vertices (x,y,z ~ 30mm) Boost trajectories (q ~ 0.6 mrad) e+ beam

  3. Vertexing • <X>, <Y> provide steering information X (mm) 100mm Y (mm) 100mm

  4. <Z> measures relative RF phase Z (mm) 2mm

  5. 1mrad 1mrad • d<X>/dz, d<Y>/dz is one measure of the collision axis X’ (mrad) Y’ (mrad)

  6. X-size of luminous region determined by emittances and IP-beta functions x-tune move towards half-integer (mm) dynamic b

  7. Boost Trajectory • Technique • mmomenta poorly measured • trajectories well measured • reconstruct mm decay plane normal n n n l y n z m- f x P m+

  8. Boost Trajectory tanl = - x’Bcosf – y’Bsinf ≈l x’(or y’)B = EH x’H – EL x’L EH - EL

  9. 1mrad • <X’B>, <Y’B> is another measure of the collision axis X’B (mrad) 1mrad Y’B (mrad)

  10. Crossing Angle • <X’B>-<X’L> = Run4 optimum from x-ing angle study <X’B>-<X’L> (mrad) <X’B>,<X’L> (mrad)

  11. sX’B, sY’B dominant contribution from electron beam x-tune move towards half-integer (mrad) dynamic b

  12. Studies on Luminosity Transient Track time resolution (~2ns) allows event association to RF bucket (476 MHz) Studied many IP parameters along bunch train z-centroid, size x,y-centroids, x-size x’,y’ means and spread mm Events 20% mini-train z-centroid x-size mm 66mm 63mm mini-train full-train

  13. b*y Msmts I - Luminosity (Z) Z-resolution (~ 30mm) negligible compared to Sz,b*y Only acceptance/efficiency matter Neglecting complications from x-y coupling, dispersion,….

  14. Luminosity (Z) Fits Run 62762-63049 Run 62101-62613 Chisq: 108, for 100-5 d.o.f. Prob: 17% Chisq: 132, for 100-5 d.o.f. Prob: 0.7% Norm 1.02125e+00 1.47665e-03 Zc 3.68052e-02 2.66972e-03 CapSigzSqrd 2.45044e+00 1.03738e-02 BetaY 1.33328e+00 1.96984e-02 Waist -8.00839e-02 1.26765e-02 Norm 1.02514e+00 1.63293e-03 Zc 2.64888e-02 2.62672e-03 CapSigzSqrd 2.21443e+00 9.75603e-03 BetaY 1.18414e+00 1.71040e-02 Waist -4.35208e-02 1.11199e-02

  15. b*y Msmts II - Luminous Y-Size (Z) Assumes common by* Y-resolution (30mm) large compared to sYL (~4mm). Courageous analysis using track miss-distance to estimate per-event resolution. Some systematics not resolved. (cm)

  16. Luminous Y-Size (Z) b*y (cm) Specific luminosity Nicely anti-correlated with Specific luminosity sLy,z=0 (cm) Specific luminosity

  17. b*y Msmts III - Boost Y-Angular Spread (Z) collisions with very correlated trajectories collisions with very correlated trajectories collisions with uncorrelated trajectories y z (ebH+ebL)(f2e/bH + f2e/bL) + z2e/bHe/bL e b (1 + z2 / b2)H + e b (1 + z2 / b2)L s2Y’B(z) = (all bs are at IP) Depends upon vertical emittances and beta-stars

  18. Boost Y-Angular Spread (Z) ey/by* by*

  19. b*y Msmts Compared dL/dz Fit βy*(eff) from phase advance. Courtesy of Jerry Yocky. σy(z) method Boost method

  20. b*y Msmts Compared BaBar results are significantly higher than PEP measurements. Possibilities: • Analysis errors • Optics different low current vs in-collision • X-Y coupling • promising; under investigation

  21. Boost Angle-Position Correlation Negative x-x’B correlation here Positive x-x’B correlation here x (y) z (z-zH) fH – (z-zL) fL b2H+(z-zH)2b2L+(z-zL)2 x’B = x (all bs are at IP) Depends upon beta-stars and waist locations

  22. Boost Angle-Position Correlation Z<0 Z>0 Adds an additional measured constraint upon vertical emittances and beta-function

  23. Vertical Emittances sy’(z) + syy’(z) fit sy’(z) fit only Systematic shift not yet understood – coupling also possible explanation

  24. IP Coupling Measurements • X-Y Coupling may explain systematic effects in our measurements and (more importantly) degrade luminosity. • Can we measure coupling parameters? • Measurements to explore • X-Y Tilt of Luminous Region Ellipsoid • X’-Y’ Tilt of Boost Vector Ellipse • X-Y’ Boost Vector Position-Angle Correlation • Y-X’ Boost Vector Position-Angle Correlation

  25. BaBar IP measurements reported online • Luminous Region • centroids { x, y, z} • sizes { x, z } every 10 minutes • tilts { dx/dz, dy/dz } • dL/dz fit { Sz, b*y } every ~hour • Boost Trajectory • mean { x’, y’ } every 10 minutes • spread { x’HER, y’HER } every 30 minutes }

  26. IP Measurements at Super-B • syL will be much smaller (20 nm) • sxL will be smaller than PEP-II syL • Z-resolution still ~< “effective” bunch lengths and by* • Boost angular spread similar • Boost angle-position correlation • larger intrinsic correlation (1/b2) • smaller x,y coordinates x-may be possible, y-not may lose due to systematic effects (alignment) • All online measurements still possible (except sxL) • Some offline analyses won’t work; replace with new ideas • Statistics will come much faster!

  27. Summary • BaBar is trying to contribute to the understanding of the PEP-II collider • New ideas for measurements keep accumulating • Understanding of IP parameter analyses seems to be converging. • Hope that (this and) future experiment/accelerator combinations can benefit from our efforts

  28. Spare Slides

More Related