1 / 20

National Patient Safety Programme

National Patient Safety Programme. Jane Murkin - National Coordinator and Jason Leitch National Clinical Lead. Adverse Events in Hospital . 3.7% Harvard 1991 16.6% Australia 1995 10.8% London 2001 3 million bed days in UK £1 billion per annum in UK 50% PREVENTABLE.

manasa
Download Presentation

National Patient Safety Programme

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. National Patient Safety Programme Jane Murkin - National Coordinator and Jason Leitch National Clinical Lead

  2. Adverse Events in Hospital • 3.7% Harvard 1991 • 16.6% Australia 1995 • 10.8% London 2001 • 3 million bed days in UK • £1 billion per annum in UK • 50% PREVENTABLE

  3. Reliability in Healthcare • Healthcare is a high hazard industry • Approx 10% ( 900,000 ) patients admitted to hospital experience an incident. • 72,000 of these incidents / adverse events contribute to the death of patients • Many go unrecognised

  4. Patient Safety – A Global Issue

  5. Current Reliability • Good people working hard will not be able to overcome the complexities of today’s systems of care to prevent errors • Studies show that human beings make errors • Misreading errors 3 in 1000 • Omission in the absence of reminders 1 in 100 (BMJ March 18 2005 Tom Nolan) • NCEPOD report on critical care (May 2005) shows: • 27% of hospitals have no early warning system • 44% of hospitals have no outreach • 66% of admissions to ICU were unstable for >12hrs (in hospital >24hrs) • 25% were not reviewed by consultant intensivist in first 12 hrs • In ICU frequent deficiencies in care: less than good in 47% • Deficiencies in care may have contributed to death in 11% (National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Death) • Consensus across many studies that

  6. A Major Study of Reliability in American Health Care… • McGlynn, et al: The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. NEJM 2003; 348: 2635-2645 (June 26, 2003) • 439 indicators of clinical quality of care • 30 acute and chronic conditions • Medical records for 6712 patients • Participants had received 54.9% of scientifically indicated care (Acute: 53.5%; Chronic 56.1%; Preventative 54.9%) • Conclusion: The Defect Rate in technical quality of American health care is approximately • 45%

  7. NHS QIS • established January 2003 by the Scottish Parliament • merger of six quality improvement organisations • special health board - independent in its advice, assessments and recommendations

  8. Scottish Patient Safety Alliance- Key Partners • Scottish Government • NHS Scotland • QIS • Royal Colleges and Professional bodies • World leading experts on patient safety • Patients • NHS Education

  9. The vision – Scotland leading the way in Patient Safety • Scotland at the forefront - a whole healthcare system approach • A strategic development priority for NHS Scotland • An explicit and tested approach to improving patient safety • Build on foundations laid through audit, clinical effectiveness and clinical governance • Alignment with wider NHS QIS Patient Safety work

  10. Key Aims • Build on what's already been achieved • Tried and tested interventions • Improve safety and reliability of boards and a safety focused culture • Capacity and capability for improvement methodology • Spread and sustainability

  11. How will we do this? • National approach – Advisory board CMO • National steering group • National Team / Clinical Lead • IHI • National learning sessions / site visits • Regional support • Evidence based interventions • Outputs from SPI 1 & 2

  12. Outcome Aims • Reduce healthcare associated infections • Reduce adverse surgical incidents • Reduce adverse drug events • Improve critical care outcomes • Improve the organisational and leadership culture on safety • Reduce mortality by 15% in 3 years • Reduce adverse events by 30% in 3 years

  13. Associated benefits • Reductions in length of stay • Reduction in complaints • Cost benefits • Care is given in the right place at the right time and in the right way • Increased improvement capability amongst staff

  14. Key objectives

  15. Integration of National work • HAI pilot work on care bundles • IHI / HPS bundle approach • Shared with IHI • IHI support in principal HPS bundle and definitions • Integration meeting planned 27/11/07

  16. Programme / Learning sessions • Pre work period Oct – Dec • Jan 08 LS1 – 3 day event, work stream breakout sessions • Collaborative approach – Learn from faculty / colleagues Coaching from faculty Gather new information on the subject matter and process improvement Share information and build work on improvement plans

  17. National Team • Experience , support, advise and guidance • Day to day contact • Site visits • Develop effective networks • Networking, sharing and learning opportunities

  18. Communications • Letters to Chief Execs • Pre work • Networking event – Nov 20th • Learning session 1 – Jan 14th, 15th, 16th • Learning session 2 – May • Learning session 3 – Nov • Regular and ongoing throughout the programme

  19. Questions ?

More Related