1 / 20

Heat Transport Measurements in Foil Targets Irradiated with Picosecond Timescale Laser Pulses

Heat Transport Measurements in Foil Targets Irradiated with Picosecond Timescale Laser Pulses.

marja
Download Presentation

Heat Transport Measurements in Foil Targets Irradiated with Picosecond Timescale Laser Pulses

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Heat Transport Measurements in Foil Targets Irradiated with Picosecond Timescale Laser Pulses D. J. Hoarty1, S F James1, C R D Brown1, R Shepherd2, J. Dunn2, M. Schneider2, G. Brown2, P. Beiersdorfer2, H. Chen2, A J Comley1, J E Andrew1, D. Chapman1, N. Sircombe1, R W Lee3, H. K.Chung4 1 AWE Plasma Physics Department, Building E1.1, Reading, Berkshire RG7 4PR, UK 2 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box 808, L-399, Livermore, CA 94550 USA 3 Department of Applied Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA 4 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA

  2. Background • High temperature and high density opacity experiments have been performed on the HELEN CPA laser using short pulse driven electron transport to heat buried layers in plastic foils but the details of the heating mechanism are not understood. • A number of measurements using X-ray spectroscopy and electron spectrometers have been carried out to try to better understand the heating mechanisms and to benchmark electron transport codes under development at AWE. • The time delay of heating at different depths in plastic foils has been investigated using X-ray spectroscopy and an ultra-fast streak camera. • The effect of target resistivity and refluxing of electrons has been investigated.

  3. X-ray spectrometer and ultra fast streak camera 1.5µm CH 2µm CH X-ray pinhole camera Laser (Electron Spectrometer) Two crystal, time-integrating spectrometer 0.1µm mid Z/ low Z mixture. Generic experimental diagnostic and target setup Time resolved and time-integrated diagnostics were fielded. Target mounting

  4. Electron heating of the target not effective in the presence of pre-pulse. (a) Spectra with green light (b) Spectra with infrared light H-like n=2-1 H-like n=2-1 He-like n=2-1 He-like n=2-1 He-like n=3-1 H-like n=3-1 Intensity (arbitrary units) He-like n=3-1 H-like n=3-1 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 X-ray energy (keV) X-ray energy (keV)

  5. 2 conversion and plasma mirrors were used to mitigate pre-pulse Pre-pulse mitigation was important for effective heating 0.5 -16 µm CH 2µm CH 1 or 2 0.15µm Al • Plasma mirrors were used in 1.06µm wavelength experiments.

  6. Plasma mirror and 2 results compared. IR +plasma mirror produces similar plasma conditions to using green light in experiments with aluminium buried layers IR+plasma mirror Green light Broad 1-3 line emission indicates densities ~ 1-2g/cc. Lyb/Heb ratio indicates high Te ~500eV

  7. Heat penetration was measured using aluminium layers buried in parylene N plastic foils. 1019W/cm2 P polarisation 2 1019W/cm2 S polarisation 2 6x1017W/cm2 P polarisation 2 6x1017W/cm2 S polarisation 2 5x1018W/cm2 P polarisation 1 plasma mirror 1.6x1017 W/cm2 S polarisation 2 1.6x1017 W/cm2 P polarisation 2 5x1018 W/cm2 S polarisation 2 5x1018W/cm2 P polarisation 1 plasma mirror Temperature, eV Detection threshold Detection threshold Al layer Depth, microns Depth, microns Penetration with 0.5ps pulses Penetration with 2ps pulses

  8. Predicted heat front position v time assuming thermal diffusion of electrons into the target 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Thermal conduction predicts a rapid fall off of temperature with depth Temperature, keV Heat front position (microns) 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Time, picoseconds Depth, microns Heating studies using multilayer targets Buried layer B Buried layer A Time delay in the emission of the two layers expected for • (a) Thermal heat conduction • (b) Coronal radiative heating enhancing the thermal conduction • Alternative/ additional heating mechanisms • (c) Return currents • (d) electron refluxing laser CH 1 µm Polypropylene substrate4, 10, 15 µm

  9. Al Ly Al Ly Si Lyα Si Lyα Si Heα Si Heα P-pol; 1019 W/cm2 ; 15m separation S-pol; 1019 W/cm2 ; 4m separation Al Ly Al Ly Si Lyα Si Heα Si Heα P-pol; 1016 W/cm2 ; 4m separation P-pol; 5x1017 W/cm2 ; 10m separation Electron transport experiments with multilayer targets Temperatures inferred from analysis of the Silicon emission are in reasonable agreement with those inferred from aluminium spectra.

  10. The target heating depends on return currents and the target conductivity . Thor II predictions of target heating v experiment Dashed lines experiment; solid lines prediction Hot electron current jh Laser beam jc “cold” electron return current • Thor II electron transport model includes return current heating. Electron transport models are being developed and will be incorporated into an AWE radiation-hydrodynamics code.

  11. The effect of conductivity change was studied using chlorinated plastic layer targets. Target 2µm PyN/1µm PyD/ 2µm PyN PyD –parylene D 50% by weight chlorine 41J, 0.5ps 2x1019W/cm2.

  12. Chlorine 1s3p data indicate higher temperatures than Al, Si. 6µm PyN /1µm PyD/ 2µm PyN 20J 0.5ps ~1x1019W/cm2 2µm PyN /1µm PyD/ 2µm PyN 41J 0.5ps ~2x1019W/cm2 Intensity a.u. Data is normalised – not an absolute flux comparison.

  13. Low and high spectral resolution data agree. • Although resolution is low (E/dE~300), the temperature inferred from the CsAP crystal spectrum agrees with that from the PET crystal. Intensity a.u.

  14. Predicted density and temperature histories for shock compression and short pulse heating. Experimental setup schematic CPA 2w 0.5ps Density (g/cc) SP 30J 0.5ps LP 300J 1ns XRSS 2 1ns square Pulse 2w ~5x1014W/cm2 Time (nanoseconds) West beam 14m 10m Temperature (keV) XRSS 1 Shock velocity ~3x106 cm/s Ablation rate ~6x105 cm/s Ablation pressure ~12Mb Time (nanoseconds) HELEN experiments have demonstrated the technique of long pulse shock compression and short pulse heating.

  15. Intensity a.u. Energy eV Shocked aluminium experiment streak data – Line broadening used to diagnose shock compression of an aluminium layer. Fits to peak compression indicate density 3g/cc and peak temperature 600 ±50eV. decompression (shock breakout) Shock arrival compression X-ray energy Pre-shock Ly He +150ps -100ps 0 +50ps time

  16. LTE The shocked germanium samples are nearer LTE but gradients are an issue. nonLTE ionization Ge 4g/cc Gradients from radiation-hydrodynamics 450-650eV, 4g/cc Temperature (eV) Experiment FLYCHK Non-LTE FLYCHK LTE - Non-LTE - LTE Emissivity J/keV/cm2/sr/s x1012 Energy (eV) Comparison of LTE and non-LTE opacity code predictions to the shocked germanium data.

  17. Electron spectrometer measurements Electron distribution inferred from fluorescence Thermal emission Kαfluorescence Electron spectrometer 2PN/ 0.15Al/ 8PN / 15Sc/1PN Emergent electron spectra for targets with different density scale-lengths laser Film data Scandium Ka frequency Experiments to measure the electron distribution Aluminium emission

  18. FLYCHK calculations including background hot electrons show these generally have little effect on the spectrum. • Thot ~200keV based on Beg scaling. • HELEN Kαmeasurements show • conversion efficiency 10-4 and imply fhot closer to 1% than 5%. • Possible effect on Ti spectrum. Lya/Heb ratio not a good temperature diagnostic. • Al Ly/He ratio not affected. Energy (eV) Energy (eV)

  19. Summary/conclusions • Electron transport experiments using buried layer targets have shown that target heating using ultra-short pulse lasers is not due to thermal conduction. • Near instantaneous heating through up to 15µm of plastic is consistent with the Thor2 model of hot electron collisional heating and Ohmic heating via a thermal return current, with Ohmic heating the dominant mechanism. • Initial experiments changing the target conductivity show an increased heating for insulator rather than metal buried layers. • Experimental measurements have begun to better characterise the electron distribution in the target.

  20. Future work • Experiments proposed for the TITAN laser will, if approved, continue this work in the next year. In the longer term studies will continue on ORION. • It is proposed to better characterise the electron distribution using electron spectrometers and Ka fluorescence and possibly Hea emission. • It is proposed to investigate further the role of conductivity and to sample deeper buried layers using absorption spectroscopy.

More Related