1 / 69

Pavement Thickness Evaluation Using Ground Penetrating Radar

Pavement Thickness Evaluation Using Ground Penetrating Radar. Dwayne Harris P.E. L.P.G Presented for Final Exam. OUTLINE. Introduction Fundamentals of GPR Methodologies for Thickness Evaluation Acquisition and Interpretation of GPR data GPR Data Quality Validation of Methodologies.

michikof
Download Presentation

Pavement Thickness Evaluation Using Ground Penetrating Radar

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pavement Thickness Evaluation Using Ground Penetrating Radar Dwayne Harris P.E. L.P.G Presented for Final Exam

  2. OUTLINE • Introduction • Fundamentals of GPR • Methodologies for Thickness Evaluation • Acquisition and Interpretation of GPR data • GPR Data Quality • Validation of Methodologies

  3. Introduction • Background on Pavement Thickness Determination • Literature Review

  4. Why Use GPR? • Why is Pavement Thickness Information Useful? • What are the Current Methods for Obtaining Thickness Information? • What are the Advantages of Using GPR for thickness Evaluation?

  5. Importance of Thickness Information • Pavement Management • Pavement performance and remaining life estimates require knowledge of pavement thickness • Setting maintenance and rehabilitation priorities • Main input in overlay design

  6. National Rehabilitation [Hartegen, 2005]

  7. INDOT • INDOT Major Moves $138,483,477 budgeted for 2006 resurfacing • Large percentage Mill and Fill rehabilitation where thickness of uppermost surface course important • Pavement thickness is needed for project level FWD structural analysis

  8. Technologies Used for Pavement Thickness Evaluation • Core • Costly • Destructive • Provides a good ground truth record. • Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) • None Destructive • Ground Penetrating Radar • Non Destructive • Collected at Highway Speed • Dense Coverage • Heavy Post Processing

  9. Related Work Thickness Evaluation • [Berge et al, 1986] initial pavement thickness studies • [Livneh and Siddiqui, 1992] mathematical model presented • [Fernando, 2000; Scullion and Saarenketo, 2002] automated interface identification • [Al-Quadi et al, 2005] model expanded to three or more layers

  10. Literature Summary • There are multiple models available for pavement thickness evaluation • The model selected for this study is utilized for a large majority of the studies • Current literature suggests using semi-automatic data interpretation methodologies

  11. Fundamentals • GPR trace and waveforms and data presentations • Mathematical model

  12. GPR Data B-scan

  13. Simple GPR Thickness Model

  14. EM Wave Propagation Velocity

  15. Dielectric Calculation

  16. Principles of GPR Interface Interpretation • The radar (EM) wave must propagate, to the interface and back. • The radar wave must reflect off the interface with enough energy to be recorded. • The interface must be identified in the GPR record.

  17. Two Interface Case A

  18. Two Interface Case B

  19. Methodologies for Thickness Evaluation • Top layer methodology • Interfaces are identified in the data • Discontinuities are located in the data • Regional dielectric constants are determined • Thickness values are calculated for each mile • Enhanced to calculate thickness using dielectric constants from individual traces • Multiple Layer Methodology

  20. Interface Selection

  21. Regional Dielectric Constants

  22. Thickness Calculation • Every thickness pick is assigned the respective regional dielectric value. • New Thickness Values Calculated. • Average value calculated for each mile.

  23. Multiple Layer Methodology • Determine the layers to be modeled • Form data set of possible interfaces • Select interfaces to be modeled • Calculate thickness values • Present the thicknesses in a visually acute format allowing for proper interpretation

  24. Quality of GPR Data • Blunders • Improper waveform selection • Omitted pavement layers • Systematic errors • Travel time systematic error • Velocity systematic error • Random errors • Error propagation

  25. I65 Study Area

  26. 13 Inches HMA Over PCC

  27. TERRA Interface Selection

  28. Difference in Dielectric Constant and Thickness

  29. Blunders • Improper waveform selection • Omitted pavement layers

  30. Omitted Pavement Layers

  31. Blunder Summary • Improperly selecting waveforms is a significant blunder source • Utilizing automated interface selection algorithm increased the likelihood of this blunder • Blunders are introduced when using the top layer methodology to evaluate thickness of pavement composed of multiple layers

  32. Systematic Error: Travel Time

  33. Velocity Systematic Error

  34. Random Error Propagation

  35. Random Error Propagation

  36. Systematic and Random Error Summary • Channel 1 data not used due to large systematic error is travel time • Velocity systematic errors propagate into thickness error • Amplitude random error propagates to about 1% relative thickness error

  37. Validation of Methodologies • Comparison with 3rd party Software • Comparison of methodologies developed • Thickness variation • GPR thickness evaluation accuracy • Network thickness study

More Related