1 / 7

Granularity study on bb muX samples

Granularity study on bb muX samples. Erik van der Kraaij CERN LCD. Changes since last results. Marlin version updated with several fixes. (still v01-11-pre02) and using latest steering file

mleavitt
Download Presentation

Granularity study on bb muX samples

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Granularity study on bbmuX samples Erik van der Kraaij CERN LCD

  2. Changes since last results • Marlin version updated with several fixes.(still v01-11-pre02) and using latest steering file • Long reconstruction times gone: this was due to too many hits in the FTDs. Fixed by changing the cone-size • Crashes are also gone now  each sample has 9k events • A matching muon is now defined by looking at the track energy: • E_cut_Transverse = 0.05*(EMCT)2 Erik van der Kraaij, CERN LCD

  3. Averaged efficiency & purity • Still some jobs crashed  not all samples have equal #muons • Muon acceptancy cuts: • E > 7.5 GeV • Theta > 8° Erik van der Kraaij, CERN LCD

  4. Averaged efficiency & purity Erik van der Kraaij, CERN LCD

  5. Granularity 30,40,50,60,90 Efficiency vs theta Purity vs theta Efficiency vs energy Purity vs energy Erik van der Kraaij, CERN LCD

  6. Granularity 30,40,50,60,90 Same as previous slide with more bins • For some reason the 50x50 performs worse over full range. Efficiency vs theta Purity vs theta Efficiency vs energy Purity vs energy Erik van der Kraaij, CERN LCD

  7. Conclusion on cell size • Efficiency worsen with bigger cells, purity is not affected • From the bad results for 50x50: either fluctuation, or this size “fits badly” with the overall detector design parameters. • 40x40 mm2 is a safe choice, going to 60x60 mm2 seems also ok. Erik van der Kraaij, CERN LCD

More Related