1 / 37

Umm Al-Qura University and King Abdul-Aziz city for science and Technology, Saudi Arabia.

Khaled Abdel-Waged, Nuha Felemban , and V.V. Uzhinskii *. Improvements of microscopic transport models stimulated by spallation data for incident energies from 113 to 15000 MeV. Umm Al-Qura University and King Abdul-Aziz city for science and Technology, Saudi Arabia. * CERN. UrQMD.

molimo
Download Presentation

Umm Al-Qura University and King Abdul-Aziz city for science and Technology, Saudi Arabia.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. KhaledAbdel-Waged, NuhaFelemban, and V.V. Uzhinskii* Improvements of microscopic transport models stimulated by spallation data for incident energies from 113 to 15000 MeV Umm Al-Qura University and King Abdul-Aziz city for science and Technology, Saudi Arabia. *CERN

  2. UrQMD Contents Comparison of the (INC, BUU, QMD) transport models with Spallation data. 1 Improvements in the dynamical contents of the UrQMD model are presented 2 Confrontation of the UrQMD calculations with the spallationdata in the energy range from 113 to 15000 MeV 3

  3. Figure 1: Schematic view of the spallation and intranuclear cascade processes.

  4. Microscopic transport models used for the description of spallation process. • Static (time independent) Mean Field Models: Intranuclear Cascade (INC) • Dynamical Mean Field models: BoltzmannUehlingUehlenbek (BUU) • (Time dependent average of the nucleon density: over (200-500) “test” particles are used in Simulation) Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) • (Time dependent sum of 2 and 3-nucleon interaction densities of all (projectile and target) nucleons)

  5. The second “de-excitation” stage of the interaction is described by: • Evaporation model • Generalized Evaporation model • Statistical Multifragmentation model

  6. Spallation Data • SATURNE (2002): p+Al, Fe, Zr, W, Pb and Th at 1.2 GeV p+Fe and Pb at 0.8 and 1.6 GeV • PISA Collaboration (2007): (p +Au at 1.2, 1.9 and 2.5 GeV) • HARP collaboration (2009) (Various targets at 3, 5, 8, 12 and15 GeV/c)

  7. Different INC models versus data of p(800 MeV)+ Pb (left) and Fe (right) Phys. Rev. C 65, 044621 (2002) Fig.2

  8. Different INC models versus data of p(1600 MeV)+ Pb (left) and Fe (right) Phys. Rev. C 65, 044621 (2002) Fig.3

  9. Modified Cascade versus data J. Cugnon Phys. Rev. C 66, 044615 (2002) Fig.4

  10. JAERI QMD model versus data JQMD, Phys. Rev. C 52, 2620 (1995); Phys. Rev. C79, 014614 (2009). Fig.6

  11. Fig.7 PISA Phys. Rev. C 76, 014618 (2007) Giessen BUU versus data of p(2.5 GeV)+Au

  12. UrQMD modelProg. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41, 225-370 (1998)

  13. UrQMD model • Mean field potential (similar to QMD) applied to nucleons at E< 5 GeV. • Collision term is similar to RQMD. • Resonances are produced at < 5 GeV for baryon- baryon and 3 GeV for meson-meson and meson-baryon reactions: 55 baryon and 32 meson states can be created with masses up to 2.25 GeV. • Color strings are formed and they decay into hadrons according to the Lund string model. • All of these hadrons can propagate and re-interact in phase space.

  14. Standard UrQMD versus data Khaled Abdel-Waged Phys.Rev.C 67,064610(2003) Fig.8

  15. Main improvements of UrQMD code Medium modified angular distributions for Reactions. 1 2 A clusterization procedure followed by an afterburner. 3 Introduction of a proper initial ground state.

  16. The angular distributions of neutrons evaluated at different laboratory energies for (left panels) and (right panels). (a) and (b) are the results calculated by the free Cugnonparametrizations, while (c) and (d) are those calculated by medium parameterizations. Fig.9

  17. Fig.10 Kh. Abdel-Waged Phys. Rev. C 70, 014605 (2004)

  18. Time evolution of (left panel) binding energy and (right panel) root mean square radius of the ground state of studied interactions computed by ImUrQMD (solid circles). The lines are the best fit to the results. Fig.11

  19. The root mean square radii for the ground state of selected nuclei from to as calculated by ImUrQMD. The experimental data are the Bethe-Weizsacker values. Fig.12

  20. Fig.13 Kh. Abdel-Waged,Phys. Rev. C 74, 034601 (2006)

  21. Fig.14 Kh. Abdel-Waged, J. of Phys. G 34, 883 (2007)

  22. Fig.15 Kh. Abdel-Waged et al.,,Phys. Rev. C 81, 014605 (2010)

  23. Fig.16 Kh. Abdel-Waged et al.,, Phys. Rev. C 81, 014605(2010)

  24. Fig.17 UrQMD calculations with frictional cooling

  25. Fig.18 Improved UrQMD calculations in potential mode

  26. HARP-CDP data comparisons (3-15 GeV/c) UrQMD calculations in cascade mode

  27. Fig.19

  28. Fig.20

  29. Fig.21

  30. Fig.22

  31. Fig.23

  32. Fig.24

  33. Fig.25

  34. Fig.26

  35. Fig.27

  36. UrQMD calculations in cascade mode HARP-CDP, CERN-PH-EP/2010-017 Fig.28

  37. CONCLUSIONS UrQMD UrQMD is a powerful tool for investigating spallation data in the incident energy range from 113 to 15000 MeV. However, several features should be taken into account before comparison with spallation data. These features are: 1 The UrQMD should be run in the potential mode for E< =3000 GeV. 2 A clusterization algorithm at the end of the fast stage of the cascade process. 3 An afterburner mechanism . Medium modification of the angular distributions of the scattered nucleons. 4 5 The UrQMD (in cascade mode) calculations show the same trend as the HARP-CDP data for the inclusive cross sections of proton-production by protons beam in the energy range 3- 15 GeV

More Related