1 / 31

Limitations in the use of RICH counters to detect tau-neutrino appearance

Limitations in the use of RICH counters to detect tau-neutrino appearance. Tord Ekel ö f /Uppsala University Roger Forty /CERN Christian Hansen This talk can be found at http://chansen.home.cern.ch/chansen/WORK/talks.html. Contents . Introduction Detector Outline

nickan
Download Presentation

Limitations in the use of RICH counters to detect tau-neutrino appearance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Limitations in the use of RICH counters to detect tau-neutrino appearance Tord Ekelöf /Uppsala University Roger Forty /CERN Christian Hansen This talk can be found at http://chansen.home.cern.ch/chansen/WORK/talks.html

  2. Contents • Introduction • Detector Outline • HPD – Hybrid Photo Diode • Simulation & Cut without Geant4 • Simulation & Cut with Geant4 • Higher Neutrino Beam momentum • Conclusion

  3. Introduction • 1998: First evidence for Neutrino Oscillation • Super Kamiokande Experiment saw missing nmfrom atmospheric data Explanation nm  nt

  4. What is n oscillation? 3 “flavor eigenstates” nenmnt 3 “mass eigenstates” n1n2n3 | nl = SmUlm | nm, l = e, m, t i.e. nlis with probability | Ul1 |2 a n1 a.s.o. …

  5. nm have different masses different speed different phases after propagation At L = 0 nm

  6. CERN to Gran Sasso Neutrino Beam(CNGS)

  7. Detection of nt appearance at Gran Sasso Opera http://operaweb.web.cern.ch/operaweb/index.shtml Icarus http://pcnometh4.cern.ch/ But would it be possible in a third way … ?

  8. A new concept of nt appearance detection nt interacts with a large target volume and via weak interaction a t is produced • Use RICH-technique to discern Cherenkov light from t from Cherenkov light from background particles

  9. Detector Outline • rd = 0.67 rm • rm = 150 cm • rd = 100 cm • a = 34 degrees Note For gaseous Cherenkov detectors, where qc is very small, rd = 0.5 rm. Here we focus Cherenkov light emitted in liquid, i.e. large qc, so then rd = 0.67 rm

  10. Detector Outline • Target volume within one module:0.45m3 • Suggested total mass for target: 1 kiloton • Density for target (C6F14): 1.67g/cm3 a 1300 modules

  11. Hexagonal Pattern

  12. HPD-Hybrid Photo Diode • HPD – an ongoing project in CERN • Now existing HPDs is about 10 times smaller than the HPDs wanted for the tau neutrino appearance detector

  13. HPD-Hybrid Photo Diode • Quantum Efficiency is about 20% • rd is about 10cm (Q 10 times smaller) • 2.3 times demagnification • High position resolution

  14. Simulation (with and without G4) • Used Neutrino Scattering Event Generator “JETTA” from CHORUS(also used by Opera) • JETTA takes as input • Neutrino beam momentum (e.g. CERN Gran Sasso neutrino beam momentum spectrum; <Pn>=17GeV) • JETTA gives as output • Particles from scattering vertex • Momentum of the particles

  15. Simulation – without G4 • JETTA also gives • tau track length • secondary particles from t decay vertex • To calculate number detectable Cherenkov photons a particle emits, use: • the particles momentum (sin2qc is a function of p) • the particles track length (L) • the transmission of the media (T = 1) • reflectivity of the mirror (R = 0.95) • Quantum Efficiency (Q = see curve) N = (a/hc)L∫QTR sin2qc dE

  16. Simulation – without G4 • The average of t momentum is about 11.6 GeV/c • The average of t track length is 0.05 cm An example; the t a • The average of number Cherenkov photons emitted by the t is 7

  17. Cut – without G4 • A reconstruction program gives the emition angles given emition and hit point

  18. Cut – without G4 For each track in the event that hit the tracking station histogram q for each hit in this event assuming the emition point was in the middle of this track, here qtrue1=0.54rad and qtrue2=0.65rad for the proton and muon respectively. a

  19. Cut – without G4 • For each hit reconstruct q for each point along a track to find qmin and qmax for this track • Cut away this point if qmin < qtrue < qmax • Do this for each track in this event a

  20. Cut – without G4 • It also works for more complicated events a

  21. Cut – without G4 • It also works when pixalisation is introduced ↴

  22. Simulation – with G4 • To introduce particles interaction with media a GEANT4 version of the simulation was written • The G4 simulation takes as input • momentum of the tau and it’s starting point and other particles from the first vertex (from the JETTA event generator) • The G4 simulation takes care off • tau decay • particle interaction (e.g. multiple scattering) • Secondary particle production (e.g. delta electrons) • cherenkov light emition • light reflection on the mirror • cherenkov light detection • …

  23. Simulation – with G4 • The G4 simulation shows allot of delta electrons • The delta electrons then produce background cherenkov photons that the cut algorithm cannot handle (see later) • In the picture • the tau decays to a muon • delta electrons are produced when the muon traverses the media • one high momentum electron goes out of the module • others scatters and transforms into gammas • green are neutral tracks and red are charged tracks

  24. Simulation – with G4 • To easily view the event whit the Cherenkov process the Cherenkov photons’ hits on the HPD surface are displayed

  25. Cut – with G4 • The same cut algorithm (described earlier) are used on the events from the G4 simulation version • The photon hits from delta electrons cannot be cut

  26. Cut – with G4 • The cut algorithm handles all Cherenkov rings • Again, photon hits from delta electrons cannot be cut • All signal photons in this event are also cut

  27. Cut – with G4 • Photons from particles with large angles might hit the HPD without being focused by the mirror • Here a pion produced a “comet” that are not touched by the cut algorithm

  28. Cut – with G4 • This is the best true event I’ve found • And even here it would be impossible to distinguish the tau ring from remaining delta electron background photons

  29. Higher n beam energy • Would we get around the problem with delta electron background by having higher energy for the n beam? • Number Cherenkov photons from tau would increase more than from electrons • But the kink angle between the tau and muon would be smaller

  30. An event with 100 times the CNGS energy for the n beam Many more t photons but they are all in the m ring and are cut away

  31. Conclusions • We have investigated the limitations in the use of RICH counters to detect tau-neutrino appearance • Delta electrons give a too disordered background and make the developed cut algorithm unfeasible • At higher energies than CNGS n beam energy the tau Cherenkov ring aligns with a ring from a tau decay product • No further work is needed to complete this investigation and this project is about to end. This talk can be found at http://chansen.home.cern.ch/chansen/WORK/talks.html

More Related