1 / 11

Cumulative Findings of Longitudinal Study of Polyamorous Families

Cumulative Findings of Longitudinal Study of Polyamorous Families. Elisabeth Sheff Southern Sociological Society March 24, 2012. Polyamorous Families . Some composed of all adults, though my research focuses on those with children Most commonly an “open couple” with additional partners

ranger
Download Presentation

Cumulative Findings of Longitudinal Study of Polyamorous Families

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cumulative Findings of Longitudinal Study of Polyamorous Families Elisabeth Sheff Southern Sociological Society March 24, 2012

  2. Polyamorous Families • Some composed of all adults, though my research focuses on those with children • Most commonly an “open couple” with additional partners • Less frequently cohabitational triads, quads, or “moresomes” • Very similar to other families of sexual minorities, especially gay and lesbian families

  3. Longitudinal Poly Family Study • Wave I 1996 - 2003: all adults, 20 men and 20 women interviewed, extensive participant observation, no contact information • Wave II 2007 - 2008: all adults, 15 previous respondents and 31 new additions interviewed • Wave III 2009 – 2012: 22 children and 38 (new) of their important adults • Total sample 131 interviewees, 500 participant observation

  4. Sample Characteristics • White • Middle class • Highly educated • Liberals • Bisexual women, heterosexual men • Urban or suburban dwellers • Overlap with other non-conformists – pagans, gamers, geeks, kinksters, sci-fi fans, SCA and LARPers

  5. Results • Limited generalizability • Unknown universe means impossible to gain representative sample • Small sample size, especially of children • Selection bias and attempts to remedy • Even so characteristic of mainstream poly communities in United States • Only longitudinal study of polyamory to date

  6. Reported Advantages • Emotional intimacy • Expanded resources • Attention • Money • Expertise • Flexibility • Consciously created family • More freedom • Question other elements of social convention • More communication

  7. Reported Disadvantages • Complicated • Time consuming • Children become attached to partners who leave • Stigma management

  8. Strategies to Deal with Disadvantages • Emotional protection • Extensive contact and communication prior to introducing lovers to children • Clarify with children who is a family member • Require lovers to establish independent relationships with children • Keep some lovers separate from family • Stigma management • Emotional Passing • Living in accepting areas

  9. Children’s Experiences • Vary primarily by age • Young children (5-8) tend to be oblivious to adults’ relationships, more focused on what adults do for the kids • Tweens (9-12) become increasingly aware of family difference, navigate others’ awareness • Teens (13-18) unapologetic for family difference, consider what it means for their own sexuality

  10. Policy and Theoretical Implications • Shift the emphasis from family founded on a (hetero)sexual relationship between a procreative dyad – a foundation that has proven quite shaky – to one that focuses on the children as the central component of family life. • Allow legal multiple parenting, which will affix more adults more securely to the children and entail not only parental rights, but responsibilities as well • Recognize multiple levels of relationships among adults to enable them to provide each other with additional support

  11. Concluding Remarks • These children doing extremely well • Born into positions of social privilege (race, class, education) • Additional resources enrich lives • Consciously constructed families more reflexive • Active agents - do not assume all adults will be parental figures • Larger more diverse sample might produce divergent results • Future research • Longitudinal contact with sample • More diverse practitioners • Continued interviews with those who leave poly lifestyle

More Related