1 / 15

Improving Academics and Social Outcomes through a Systems Integrated Approach to RTI

Improving Academics and Social Outcomes through a Systems Integrated Approach to RTI. Carol Massanari Susan Barrett Steve Goodman. Outcomes. What is it? Define RtI and SW-PBS (policy, funding) Identify resources to gain more information What does it look like when it happens? Michigan

samira
Download Presentation

Improving Academics and Social Outcomes through a Systems Integrated Approach to RTI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Improving Academics and Social Outcomes through a Systems Integrated Approach to RTI Carol Massanari Susan Barrett Steve Goodman

  2. Outcomes • What is it? • Define RtI and SW-PBS (policy, funding) • Identify resources to gain more information • What does it look like when it happens? • Michigan • Discuss how to better integrate RTI and PBS in your state or district

  3. Logic of a Tiered (RTI) Approach • Unifying Belief- “All kids can learn” • Focus on Prevention • Universal Screening of academic, behavioral and social emotional indicators of success • Data Based Decision Making • Multi-tiered system with implementation of evidence-based interventions; implemented with fidelity • Ongoing and sensitive progress monitoring of student response to interventions

  4. RTI Applications Academic Social Behavior Early intervention Decrease in ODRs Decrease in suspension/expulsion Access to the general curriculum Increasing intensity of instruction/intervention Suspension/expulsion of students with disabilities • Closing the achievement gap • Early intervention, especially reading • Access to the general curriculum • Increasing intensity of instruction/intervention • Alternative identification for LD

  5. Supporting Policy IDEA - 2004 • Focus on access to the general curriculum • Access to FAPE and LRE • Alternative identification of LD • Early Intervening Services • Addressing behavioral concerns NCLB • Focus on Outcomes • Inclusive assessment • Scientific research-based practices

  6. IDEA 2004A focus on early identification of non-learning and intervention • An LEA may not use more than 15 percent . . To develop and implement coordinated, early intervening services. [34 CFR § 300.226 (a)] • A State . . (1) Must not require the use of a severe discrepancy . . .(2) Must permit the use of a process based on the child’s response to scientific, research-based intervention. [34 CFR § 300.307 9a) (2) (2)]

  7. State Implementation of RTI for LD86% Return Rate • Statewide training efforts are underway in 90% of the states primarily emphasizing an overview of RTI, progress monitoring and the use of data-driven decision-making. • Over one-third of the states indicated that they plan to use RTI, in part, as a replacement or supplement to the learning disability discrepancy model. • Most states indicated that they are or plan to use a combined problem solving- standard treatment protocol model for making multi-tiered RTI decisions.

  8. State Implementation of PBIS • 49 states plus Washington DC have some relationship with Center for PBIS (http://www.pbis.org/map.htm) • Many improvement activities related to making sure that PBS was well implemented and well understood (Part B SPP/APR Indicator Analyses 8/01/07) • Providing TA/training/professional development listed by 47 states including, but not limited to, PBIS and RTI to reduce suspensions and expulsions ( Part B SPP/APR 2008 Indicator Analyses)

  9. Funding • Special Education • IDEA Part B Discretionary Funds • State Personnel Development Grants • CEIS 15% • Title I • Schoolwide Programs • Targeted Assistance • Title III (LEP) • High Quality Language Instruction • Professional Development

  10. Resources • National Center on Response to Intervention • www.rti4success.org • IDEA Partnership • www.ideapartnership.org/page.cfm?pageid=20 • US ED IDEA 2004 EIS • http://idea.ed.gov

  11. Resources • All Kinds of Minds • State Implementation Summary • www.allkindsofminds.org/policy/RtI_Policy.aspx • National Implementation of RtI: Research Summary, August 2008 • http:nasdse.org/Portals/0/NationalImplemnetationofRTI-ResearchSummary.pdf • RtI Action Network • www.RTINetwork.org

  12. Michigan • Insert Steve Slides here!

  13. Discussion • Okay, so what do I do as a State or District Coordinator? • Why would you bring the two initiatives together in your state/district? • What are the shared structures for supporting implementation and sustainability of RTI and SW-PBS initiatives? • What have you done to coordinate the two initiatives in your state?

  14. Challenges • Moving forward in isolation ? • Policy/Handbooks for Implementation look good but not reality • Funding decreasing • Districts moving forward –not always aligned with state

  15. The Good News • Three Tiered logic • Implementation Phases • Years of experience closing the implementation gap • Access to schools with existing infrastructure-coaching, evaluation, problem solving teams, district teams, state teams

More Related