1 / 20

Sublethal Effect of Plant Lower Nitrogen Level on Development and Feeding Preference of the Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera e

Sublethal Effect of Plant Lower Nitrogen Level on Development and Feeding Preference of the Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Yigen Chen and John Ruberson Dept. of Entomology, UGA. Importance of N for insects.  Many h erbivorous insects select high N plants.

sasson
Download Presentation

Sublethal Effect of Plant Lower Nitrogen Level on Development and Feeding Preference of the Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera e

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sublethal Effect of Plant Lower Nitrogen Level on Development and Feeding Preference of the Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Yigen Chen and John RubersonDept. of Entomology, UGA

  2. Importance of N for insects Many herbivorous insects select high N plants Efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) is low when feeding on low N diets N affects plant direct defense N affects herbivore mortality incurred through natural enemies – plant indirect defense

  3. Study system  Plant: Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)  Beet armyworm (BAW), Spodoptera exigua

  4. Questions? How do plant biomass and nutritional quality change in response to N? Is development of BAW affected by host plant quality? Is lifetime feeding damage per caterpillar affected by host plant quality? Can BAW distinguish host plants with different nutritional quality?

  5. Materials and Methods  Cotton plants (var. FiberMax 989)  Grown with peat moss and top soil in flower pot, fertilized with chemical solution 4-5 times weekly; 100 ml each time  Plants had 4-5 mature leaves for experiments  Cotton plant growing regimes 42, 112, 196, and 280 ppm N  Beet armyworm from lab colony

  6. Materials and methods — Question 1 ----How do plant biomass and nutritional quality change in response to N  Percentage of total N of dried leaf blade  Petiole NO3-N  Biomass measurement - Plants oven-dried and weighed

  7. Results — Question 1 ----How do plant biomass and nutritional quality change in response to N

  8. Results — Question 1 ----How do plant biomass and nutritional quality change in response to N

  9. Results — Question 1 ----How do plant biomass and nutritional quality change in response to N

  10. Materials and methods — Question 2 ----Is development of BAW affected by host plant quality?  Bioassay with neonate BAW caterpillars in Petri dish with excised leaves  Bioassay with 3-d-old caterpillars in caged plants which allow intra-plant movement

  11. Results — Question 2 ----Is development of BAW affected by host plant quality?  Bioassay with neonate BAW

  12. Results — Question 2 ----Is development of BAW affected by host plant quality?  Bioassay allowing intra-plant movement Note:Other variables such as pupa weight, % caterpillars pupated, and sex ratio were not affected by N treatment.

  13. Materials and methods — Question 3 ----Is lifetime feeding damage per caterpillar affected by host plant quality? • 3-d-old caterpillar caged on leaves attached to live plants with different N contents • Bioassay starts with leaf node 1, 2, and so on upward •  Measure leaf tissue eaten on D2, D4, D7, and after pupation

  14. Results — Question 3 ----Is lifetime feeding damage per caterpillar affected by host plant quality?

  15. Results — Question 3 ----Is lifetime feeding damage per caterpillar affected by host plant quality?

  16. Materials and methods — Question 4 ----Can BAW distinguish host plants with different nutritional quality? • Eight 5-d-old caterpillars released in the center • Bioassay on 3rd leaf

  17. Results — Question 4 ----Can BAW distinguish host plants with different nutritional quality?

  18. Summary Lower N decreases cotton plant biomass and nutritional quality for BAW caterpillars Low N level of host plants delays BAW development Low N level of host plants tends to increase BAW caterpillar lifetime feeding damage BAW caterpillars feed preferentially on high N plants

  19. Significance ? Trade-offs between low and high N cotton plants: Low N decreases plant biomass and suitability for BAW, but the reduced suitability may be compensated for by increased feeding by herbivores But lower N may tend to increase plant indirect defense through natural enemies - BAW may move more on low N plants to locate more suitable food, which would expose them to greater mortality Natural enemies may be more effective because BAW feeding on low N plants have prolonged developmental time

  20. Acknowledgments We thank Melissa Thompson for maintenance of BAW colony The project was financially supported by GA Cotton Commission and Cotton Incorporated

More Related