1 / 1

Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab

Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab Jonathan Dumas ( JLab /LPSC ), Joe Grames ( JLab ), Eric V outier (LPSC). Outlook. The Experiment. We investigate the idea of generating polarized positrons using the CEBAF polarized electron photoinjector . - low energy (e - beam energy ≤ 8.5 MeV )

sutton
Download Presentation

Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab Jonathan Dumas (JLab/LPSC), Joe Grames (JLab), Eric Voutier(LPSC) Outlook The Experiment We investigate the idea of generating polarized positrons using the CEBAF polarized electron photoinjector. - low energy (e- beam energy ≤ 8.5 MeV) - bremsstrahlung photons - low radiation level - thin LOW/HIGH power target A polarized positron source is intended for the ILC. E166 has demonstrated feasibility of a polarized positron source by pair creation: - high energy e- beam (≈50 GeV) - synchrotron photons - thin low power target Electron Beam Energy Electron Driver The goal is to measure electron momentum with precision better than 0.5%. Magnetic field map and operational range increased to 8.5 MeV to support this goal. • The design goal for the electron driver is to produce a high average current (1 mA), high polarization (85%) with energy up to ~ 10 MeV electron beam. The CEBAF photoinjector provides the necessary characteristics: • Electron Gun • GaAs/GaAsPsuperlattice photocathode • High QE ~1% at 780 nm (~6 mA/mW) • Test surface charge limit • High Polarization ~85% at 780 nm • => Test polarization at high current • 1.5 GHz fiber laser (500 mW @ 780 nm) • Test new 1.5GHz rf control module • 100kV DC Load Lock Electron Gun • demonstrated lifetime >250 C at 1 mA • (J. Grames et al., in Proc. of the 2007 Particle Accelerator Conference, THPMS064, p. 3130.) • => Field emission is limiting lifetime • Photoinjector • “G0” high bunch charge demonstrated • 1.3 pC @ 31 MHz  ~2 mA at 1.5 GHz • Restore G0 setup • Test pulsed mode DF~0.1% • Consider 200 kV gun option? • Normal & SRF cavities => ~8.5 MeV • Target spot size set by quadrupoles 2008: Develop simulation tools and design experiment 2009: Build and install experiment beam line, demonstrate e+ production 2010: Characterize e+ (polarization, yield, energy and angular distributions) Goal = Deliver simulation tools, experimental data, baseline design for e+ source Electron Polarimetry High precision (~1%) Mott measures electron polarization (at higher current) and calibrates positron polarimeter. Transfer polarization from e- to e+ Positron Polarimetry • - Transmission Compton • - Well suited for low momentum • - Rapid relative monitor • Successfully used, e.g., E166 • (P.Schuler et al., in Proc. of the 17th international spin physics symposium, p. 1095.) In a material, e- radiate gs (Bremsstrahlung). gs (>1.022MeV) can create a e+/e- pair. Bremsstrahlung e- longitudinal g circular Pair creation g circular e+ longitudinal Polarization transfer depends on: -e- energy Ee- -g energy Eg -Target atomic number: Z -g scattering angle Polarization transfer depends on: - g energy Eg -e+ energy Ee+ -Target atomic number: Z -e+ scattering angle Electromagnetic shower : -Bremsstrahlung - Pair creation Particle Distributions Particle distributions (scattering angle vs energy) after the foil for: Tungsten foil: - Thickness: 0.25 mm Electron beam: - 1 bunch (0.67 pC-1 mA at 1.5 GHz) - energy of 5 MeV - transverse size of 1 mm The target: a Tungsten foil Polarization transfer calculation for both interactions. Olsen & Maximon, Phys. Rev. 114 (1957) • Use tungsten because: • High Z => greater EM shower • Low power target => Low cost • Thin target => better beam quality • Good thermal properties => extends deposited power limit • Considerations: • Positron yield (foil thickness optimization) • Power deposition (melting foil) Geant4 simulation: polarization distribution at the creation vertex Ee-= 5 MeV e- longitudinal = 100% Z=74 (Tungsten) g scattering angle=all Eg= 5 MeV g circular= 100% Z=74 (Tungsten) e+ scattering angle=all at the exitof the foil Electron distribution e- momentum ~ 4.7 MeV/c Scattering angle < 30o Photon distribution Large amount of photons Low energy Positron distribution Low momentum (0.5->2 MeV/c) ~58% at 2 MeV Eg= 5 MeV g circular= 100% Z=74 (Tungsten) e+ scattering angle=all Target thickness=0.25mm Ee-= 5 MeV e- longitudinal = 100% Z=74 (Tungsten) scattering angle=all Target thickness=0.25mm Ee-= 5 MeV e- longitudinal = 85% Z=74 (Tungsten) e+ scattering angle=all Target thickness=0.25mm Fig.7: Positron yield after the foil and power deposit in the target.

More Related