1 / 22

The effect of plant coverage on macro-invertebrate density and diversity in the intertidal zone

The effect of plant coverage on macro-invertebrate density and diversity in the intertidal zone. Sarah Park, Bailey Shuttleworth Cucinelli, James Holobow, and Jenna Shaw. Introduction. Ecologically important region Few studies on the effects of flora on faunal biodiversity

tameka
Download Presentation

The effect of plant coverage on macro-invertebrate density and diversity in the intertidal zone

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The effect of plant coverage on macro-invertebrate density and diversity in the intertidal zone Sarah Park, Bailey Shuttleworth Cucinelli, James Holobow, and Jenna Shaw

  2. Introduction • Ecologically important region • Few studies on the effects of flora on faunal biodiversity • Goal: provide greater understanding of marine interactions

  3. Indian Point

  4. Green’s Point

  5. Bar Road

  6. Ascophyllum nodosum

  7. Fucus vesiculosus

  8. Polysiphonia lanosa

  9. Fauna Littorina littorea Littorina obtusata Thais lapillus

  10. Fauna Balanus balanoides Gammarus oceanicus

  11. Invertebrate Density • L. obtusata and G. oceanicus live in patches of seaweed • L. littorea feed on algae • B. balanoides and T. lapillus seek shelter from wave action • Large and aggregated vegetation shelter greater number of invertebrates

  12. Hypothesis 1: • Amount of plant cover on intertidal regions of the Bay of Fundy is positively correlated with invertebrate density.

  13. Invertebrate Biodiversity • High biodiversity → stable and productive communities • Schooner (1974): niche diversification/complex habitats may increase species richness • quantify habitat complexity? • Gunnill (1982): artificial increase and diversity may decrease with increased plant cover

  14. Hypothesis 2: • Amount of plant cover on intertidal regions of the Bay of Fundy is negatively correlated with invertebrate biodiversity.

  15. Materials Methods • line transect • 1 m quadrat • 25 cm quadrat • plastic collection bags for samples • ten sites over 100 m • constant altitude • surface species were collected • identified in the lab

  16. Results

  17. Discussion Indian Point • Lowest plant cover (3.9 samples/m2) • Second largest fauna density (173.1 samples/m2) • Second highest diversity (H’=0.307) Hypothesis 1: Not Accepted Hypothesis 2: Accepted

  18. Discussion Green’s Point • Largest plant cover (42.8 samples/m2) • Lowest fauna density (97.2 samples/m2) • Greatest diversity (H’=0.683) Hypothesis 1: Not Accepted Hypothesis 2: Not Accepted

  19. Discussion Bar Road • Second Highest plant cover (7.2 samples/m2) • Largest fauna density (275.8 samples/m2) • Lowest diversity (H’=0.088) Hypothesis 1: Accepted Hypothesis 2: Accepted

  20. Sources of Error • hard to distinguish holdfasts in high density of plants • distance from the water’s edge was not measured • inconsistent tide phase • time restriction

  21. Conclusion - Our study did not produce concrete results - Overall data is inconsistent - Multiple factors (abiotic/biotic) influence invertebrate density/diversity.

More Related