1 / 18

Are Behavioral Biases Consistent Across the Atlantic? The Over/Under Market for European Soccer

Are Behavioral Biases Consistent Across the Atlantic? The Over/Under Market for European Soccer. Rodney J. Paul – St. Bonaventure University Andrew P. Weinbach – Coastal Carolina University. Introduction. In North American sports betting – Biases demonstrated in totals (over/Under) markets

tiger-carter
Download Presentation

Are Behavioral Biases Consistent Across the Atlantic? The Over/Under Market for European Soccer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Are Behavioral Biases Consistent Across the Atlantic? The Over/Under Market for European Soccer Rodney J. Paul – St. Bonaventure University Andrew P. Weinbach – Coastal Carolina University

  2. Introduction • In North American sports betting – Biases demonstrated in totals (over/Under) markets • This study examines European Football (Soccer) Leagues to test for similar bias

  3. Betting on Totals • What are Totals? • Over/Under bets • Sportsbooks offer a “total” for total points scored in a game (both teams, combined) • Over – wager that score > total • Under – wager that score < total • Example – final score of 2-1 > 2.5

  4. A preference for the “over” • Fans appear to prefer betting on the over (prefer scoring?) • Highest totals appear “too high” (under wins > over wins) • National Football League – Paul and Weinbach (Journal of Sports Economics – 2002) • College Football (NCAA) and Arena Football – Paul and Weinbach (Journal of Economics and Finance – 2005) • National Basketball Association – Paul, Weinbach, Wilson (Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance – 2004) • Similar results found in Major League Baseball, National Hockey League, and Canadian Football League • For Monday Night Football – Better ratings for high scoring games – Paul and Weinbach (Journal of Economics and Business)

  5. Source of the bias • All North American Sports exhibit similar results • For games with highest totals • Under wins often enough to reject the null hypothesis of a fair bet (Win% = 50%) • In some cases, under wins enough to reject the null hypothesis of no profits (win % = 52.4%) • Why do totals appear to be inaccurate? • Traditional model of sportsbook behavior – over bettors drive totals “too high” • Levitt (2004) Model of sportsbook behavior – sportsbooks forecast game outcome and fan interest

  6. Bias for Over in European Soccer? • European Soccer Leagues • Low-scoring • Huge fan base • Are European Soccer fans different? • No bias, or bias toward “under” may indicate difference • If “over” bias observed, preferences consistent with North American bettors • Attraction of scoring may be universal trait

  7. Testing efficiency • Subjective probability = objective probability • Based on sportsbook odds • Do betting odds represent accurate forecasts of true outcomes?

  8. Data • www.Football-Data.co.uk • 2 full seasons for 22 leagues • Only leagues with complete data • All bets based on proposition over/under 2.5 goals • Odds adjustments used to adjust prices / rather than moving total • Odds reported as return or payback to the a 1 unit bet on the “over” • For example: a winning over bet with payback of 2.2 will return €2.2 for a €1 wager (1.2 + 1) • Subjective probability calculated based on Gandar , et. al. (2002) methods

  9. Table I: Returns and Market Efficiency Tests for European Soccer Totals 2005-2007

  10. Results • Full sample - 15,570 observations • “Under” returns -4.770% • “Over” returns -11.64% • Subj. prob (47.7%) • Obj. prob (45.83%) • Z: -4.6620

  11. Bettor Biases • Overs vs. Unders • Full Sample - “overs” appear overbet • Favorite-longshot bias • “overs” with longest odds overbet • “unders” with longest odds not overbet • Considering both biases better explains results

  12. Conclusion • Over bias similar to North American sports • Favorite longshot bias • Multiple biases present

More Related