1 / 80

Detection of Equatorial Waves in Data

Detection of Equatorial Waves in Data. OLR power spectrum, 1979–2001 (Symmetric). from Wheeler and Kiladis, 1999. Space-Time Spectrum of JJA Symmetric OLR, 15  S-15  N. Kelvin. “TD” band. MJO. Eq. Rossby. Wheeler and Kiladis, 1999.

veta
Download Presentation

Detection of Equatorial Waves in Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Detection of Equatorial Waves in Data

  2. OLR power spectrum, 1979–2001 (Symmetric) from Wheeler and Kiladis, 1999

  3. Space-Time Spectrum of JJA Symmetric OLR, 15S-15N Kelvin “TD” band MJO Eq. Rossby Wheeler and Kiladis, 1999

  4. Space-Time Spectrum of JJA Antisymmetric OLR, 15S-15N Inertio- Gravity “TD” band MJO Wheeler and Kiladis, 1999

  5. Space-Time Spectrum of JJA Antisymmetric OLR, 15S-15N Wheeler and Kiladis, 1999

  6. 2002 CLAUS Brightness Temperature 5ºS-5º N

  7. 2002 CLAUS Brightness Temperature 5ºS-5º N

  8. 2002 CLAUS Brightness Temperature 5ºS-5º N

  9. 2005 CLAUS Brightness Temperature 5ºS-5º N

  10. 2005 CLAUS Brightness Temperature 5ºS-5º N

  11. 2005 CLAUS Brightness Temperature 5ºS-5º N

  12. 1987 CLAUS Brightness Temperature 5ºS-5º N

  13. 1987 CLAUS Brightness Temperature 5ºS-5º N

  14. 1987 CLAUS Brightness Temperature 5ºS-5º N

  15. 2001 CLAUS Brightness Temperature 5ºS-5º N

  16. 2001 CLAUS Brightness Temperature 5ºS-5º N

  17. 2001 CLAUS Brightness Temperature 5ºS-5º N

  18. 2001 CLAUS Brightness Temperature 5ºS-5º N

  19. 2001 CLAUS Brightness Temperature 5ºS-5º N

  20. 2001 CLAUS Brightness Temperature 5ºS-5º N

  21. Vertical Structure of Equatorial Waves

  22. Temperature Structure of a Dry Kelvin Wave Direction of Motion W C W C

  23. Temperature Structure of a Dry Kelvin Wave Direction of Motion W C W C

  24. Temperature at Majuro (7N, 171E) Regressed against Kelvin-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) for 1979-1999 OLR (top, Wm-2) Temperature (contours, .1 °C), red positive from Straub and Kiladis 2002

  25. Temperature at Majuro (7N, 171E) Regressed against Kelvin-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) for 1979-1999 Wave Motion OLR (top, Wm-2) Temperature (contours, .1 °C), red positive from Straub and Kiladis 2002

  26. Linear Theory Predicts: where is the vertical wavenumber is the equivalent depth is the vertical wavelength is the scale height

  27. Using Representative Numbers for the Tropical Stratosphere: “Peak Projection Response” for h=200 m, c=45 m/s, Lz=12.0 km

  28. Using Representative Numbers for the Tropical Stratosphere: “Peak Projection Response” for h=200 m, c=45 m/s, Lz=12.0 km Convectively coupled Kelvin for h=30 m, c=15 m/s, Lz=4.0 km

  29. Using Representative Numbers for the Tropical Stratosphere: “Peak Projection Response” for h=200 m, c=45 m/s, Lz=12.0 km Convectively coupled Kelvin for h=30 m, c=15 m/s, Lz=4.0 km for c=5 m/s, Lz=1.2 km MJO

  30. Zonal Wind at Majuro (7N, 171E) Regressed against Kelvin-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) for 1979-1999 OLR (top, Wm-2) Zonal Wind (contours, .25 ms-1), red positive from Straub and Kiladis 2002

  31. Temperature at Majuro (7N, 171E) Regressed against Kelvin-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) for 1979-1999 Wave Motion OLR (top, Wm-2) Temperature (contours, .1 °C), red positive from Straub and Kiladis 2002

  32. Specific Humidity at Majuro (7N, 171E) Regressed against Kelvin-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) for 1979-1999 Wave Motion OLR (top, Wm-2) Specific Humidity (contours, 1 X 10-1 g kg-1), red positive from Straub and Kiladis 2002

  33. TOGA COARE Temperature (2S, 155E) Regressed against Westward Inertio Gravity-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) Wave Motion Temperature (contours, .1 °C), red positive Haertel and Kiladis 2004

  34. TOGA COARE Specific Humidity (2S, 155E) Regressed against Westward Inertio Gravity-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) Wave Motion Specific Humidity (contours, 1 X 10-1 g kg-1), red + Haertel and Kiladis 2004

  35. OLR and 850 hPa Flow Regressed against MJO-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) at eq, 155E, 1979-1993 Day 0 Streamfunction (contours 4 X 105 m2 s-1) Wind (vectors, largest around 2 ms-1) OLR (shading starts at +/- 6 W s-2), negative blue from Kiladis et al. 2005

  36. OLR and 850 hPa Flow Regressed against MJO-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) at eq, 155E, 1979-1993 Day-16 Streamfunction (contours 4 X 105 m2 s-1) Wind (vectors, largest around 2 ms-1) OLR (shading starts at +/- 6 W s-2), negative blue

  37. OLR and 850 hPa Flow Regressed against MJO-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) at eq, 155E, 1979-1993 Day-12 Streamfunction (contours 4 X 105 m2 s-1) Wind (vectors, largest around 2 ms-1) OLR (shading starts at +/- 6 W s-2), negative blue

  38. OLR and 850 hPa Flow Regressed against MJO-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) at eq, 155E, 1979-1993 Day-8 Streamfunction (contours 4 X 105 m2 s-1) Wind (vectors, largest around 2 ms-1) OLR (shading starts at +/- 6 W s-2), negative blue

  39. OLR and 850 hPa Flow Regressed against MJO-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) at eq, 155E, 1979-1993 Day-4 Streamfunction (contours 4 X 105 m2 s-1) Wind (vectors, largest around 2 ms-1) OLR (shading starts at +/- 6 W s-2), negative blue

  40. OLR and 850 hPa Flow Regressed against MJO-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) at eq, 155E, 1979-1993 Day 0 Streamfunction (contours 4 X 105 m2 s-1) Wind (vectors, largest around 2 ms-1) OLR (shading starts at +/- 6 W s-2), negative blue

  41. OLR and 850 hPa Flow Regressed against MJO-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) at eq, 155E, 1979-1993 Day+4 Streamfunction (contours 4 X 105 m2 s-1) Wind (vectors, largest around 2 ms-1) OLR (shading starts at +/- 6 W s-2), negative blue

  42. OLR and 850 hPa Flow Regressed against MJO-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) at eq, 155E, 1979-1993 Day+8 Streamfunction (contours 4 X 105 m2 s-1) Wind (vectors, largest around 2 ms-1) OLR (shading starts at +/- 6 W s-2), negative blue

  43. OLR and 850 hPa Flow Regressed against MJO-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) at eq, 155E, 1979-1993 Day+12 Streamfunction (contours 4 X 105 m2 s-1) Wind (vectors, largest around 2 ms-1) OLR (shading starts at +/- 6 W s-2), negative blue

  44. Zonal Wind at Honiara (10S, 160E) Regressed against MJO-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) for 1979-1999 OLR Pressure (hPa) Wave Motion OLR (top, Wm-2) U Wind (contours, .5 ms-1), red positive from Kiladis et al. 2005

  45. Temperature at Honiara (10S, 160.0E) Regressed against MJO-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) for 1979-1999 OLR Pressure (hPa) Wave Motion OLR (top, Wm-2) Temperature (contours, .1 °C), red positive from Kiladis et al. 2005

  46. Specific Humidity at Truk (7.5N, 152.5E) Regressed against MJO-filtered OLR (scaled -40 W m2) for 1979-1999 OLR Pressure (hPa) Wave Motion OLR (top, Wm-2) Specific Humidity (contours, 1 X 10-1 g kg-1), red positive from Kiladis et al. 2005

  47. Lag-height regressions of OSA specific humidity vs. moisture budget-derived rainrate. The data are progressively regridded to coarser time intervals ((a) 6 h, (b) 1 day, and (c) 4 days), and a light high-pass filter is used for each panel (cutoff period six times the lag window width). (d) The original unfiltered 6 h data are used, with a very wide lag window. Contour unit is 0.1 g/kg per mm/h. from Mapes et al. 2006

  48. Conclusion 1: Large scale atmospheric waves modulate waves and convection (along with the diurnal cycle) on smaller scales Conclusion 2: A portion of tropical convective activity is organized by equatorially trapped waves of Matsuno’s shallow water theory

More Related