1 / 15

Recap of Day 1

Recap of Day 1. Paul Kimani, University of Nairobi, Kenya. DLB Workshop, 29-30 April 2019, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI. Contents. Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4. Session 1. Focus of the session was introduction and scene setting for the DLB Core team meet

whittemore
Download Presentation

Recap of Day 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Recap of Day 1 Paul Kimani, University of Nairobi, Kenya DLB Workshop, 29-30 April 2019, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI

  2. Contents • Session 1 • Session 2 • Session 3 • Session 4

  3. Session 1 • Focus of the session was introduction and scene setting for the DLB Core team meet • Welcome by remarks by: • Prof FirewMekbib to Ethiopia • Prof Gabrielle Parsely- noted that the proposal had to reformulated to meet new proposal format in Australia • As result commencement date is 1 April for three years • End of Project: 31 March 2022 • That Syngenta Foundation has agreed in principle to support Phase 2 • Final approvals pending • Noted there were new team members: Prof Kaye Basefordof the Univ of Queensland, and Dr Nathan King – the project administrator • Formal introductions by one member in each table

  4. Sessions 1 –cont’d • Nasser, the project coordinator outlined the project objectives, outputs, outcomes and indicators • Three objectives: • Best practices from public and private sectors in plant variety design • Education and training • Policy analysis and advocacy • Key activities for each objective listed • Cross cutting activities, methods, outputs and communication discussed • He also outlined the deliverables expected • Key among these is publication of DLB Textbook by Dec 2019; (only one draft received so far); annual reports.

  5. Session 2 • Session 2 started with a recap of the Objectives, Outputs and timelines of Phase 2 • There was a discussion on what is new in this Phase. It was noted that, while market led breeding has been practised for many years, 80% of the DLB content are new ideas and principles • These ideas have been integrated into a coherent, practical breeding program. • Viv compared key features of public breeding compared to private sector and demand driven breeding • She noted that key features of public breeding included population and line development, field tests, selection, characterisation, national performance trials and meeting regulatory requirements.

  6. Session 2 (continued) • In contrast, business driven breeding has several additional features including: • meeting specified performance standards [critical for their reputation and which if broken can to lead to liabilities], • extensive characterisation, • product positioning, • pricing, positioning, • communication, • variety promotion and seed availability before launching new varieties • Andy explained that positioning a new variety involves providing information on: • What is it? [i.e. what are its features] • What it does? [ i.e the benefits] • Who is it for ? [Target market] • Why should farmers buy it rather than the alternative?

  7. Product profiles • There was considerable discussion on product profiles • Noted that understanding crop uses and value characteristics were essential in evaluating variety performance and creating technical data sheets, which are used to make product profiles • This information useful in targeting customer segment and product profile design. • Noted that top quality data sheet is characterized by : • Clear positioning statement • Comparative data • Photos • Is attractive • Breeder’s name

  8. Crop Expert groups • The participants discussed elements of the proposed Crop Expert groups • Noted that there is need to develop TORs • May include researchers with experience with the crop; be multidisciplinary (breeders, crop protection , nutrition, socio-economics specialists); the industry, communications specialists, among others. • Noted that it may be essential to outsource certain expert information if not available within DLB • Size: max of 6 persons • Requested: Participants to register their interest with the Project Coordinator • Crops: Beans, sorghum, tomato • New Modules: 3 new modules will be developed

  9. Policy and advocacy • Discussion was led by JC • Noted that target countries were: • Ethiopia (beans) • Uganda (beans) • Ghana (tomatoes) • Southern Africa ? • Noted that policy formulation is a process and there was need to understand the process and key actors in each target country • Need to identify and provide information to persuade the policy makers on why a particular crop should be supported • There is need to have a clear strategy on how this will be done

  10. Other key points • There will be an annual coordination meeting- 29 April was the first one. • Target crops • Beans • Tomatoes • Others: Sorghum, cassava and maize • Key countries: Uganda, Ghana and Ethiopia • Key implementers: BECA, ACCI, CIAT, WACII and UON • Emphasized need to develop product profiles and technical data sheets for each product • Project website- still being discussed • African seed catalogue planned • Capacity building should focus individual and institutional levels

  11. Session 3 • This session focused on updates on activities conducted at various DLB nodes and proposed next steps. • ACCI reported on the DLB seminar presented by Prof Shimelis to ICRISAT scientists at Hyderabad, India. He noted that there was interest to learn more about DLB. • George of EiB and Prof Shimelis donated DLB books to ICRISAT scientists and the library • Noted that zero draft for breeders training has been submitted • Prof Shimelis reported that he has been requested to write chapter on breeding for new book. It will focus on DLB

  12. EiB • George Koch presented on EiB through video • He explained that EIB was keen to collaborate with DLB and Africa was target area at present • This was followed by intense discussion on which areas for collaboration • Noted that there were similarities and differences between the two. Areas of focus should be identified, terms clarified to avoid confusion • Suggested possible areas for collaboration in developing Modules 2, 3,4 and 5- especially for training future breeders in African universities • Solomon presented the product profile tool

  13. Node Updates • Updates were presented by participants from PABRA-CIAT, Makerere University and the University of Nairobi • Prof Chiteka reported on training activities at Makerere • Noted that PABRA will contribute 4 chapters in the DLB Book2 • Clare/Viv reported on gender in DLB meet at Cornell and development of a module of in partnership with GREAT project. • University of Zambia and University of Lilongwe had expressed interest in DLB training • Prof Mekbib and Dr Berhanu reported on DLB activities in Ethiopia. They noted that there will be a training program for breeders and on the recently developed variety catalogue • Paul Kimani presented updated on DLB activities at UON. He noted DLB has been intergrated in Advanced Plant Breeding Course for MSc in Plant Breeding and Biotech students • Joint training of breeders with BECA • Graduate students are encouraged to include DLB principles and practices in their thesis research • LTD, a start-up seed company for UON, and links with policy makers

  14. Node Updates • Five new projects with elements of DLB started: Tomato , rice, soybean, marker assisted gamete selection for Andean and Mesoamerican bean populations • He also reported on progress with Food and Seed Industry and activities of UNISEED

  15. Session 4 • Project Coordinator reported on survey sent to 600 respondents • Noted that 94 responded • 61 finally analyzed • Sought ideas on how to make the survey more effective • Noted that Dr Walter assisted in contacting respondents in West Africa, where the best response was registered.

More Related