1 / 27

Taxonomy and Knowledge Organization Taxonomy in Context

Taxonomy and Knowledge Organization Taxonomy in Context. Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services http://www.kapsgroup.com. Agenda. Introduction: Time for Taxonomies Business Case for Taxonomies

zoe
Download Presentation

Taxonomy and Knowledge Organization Taxonomy in Context

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Taxonomy and Knowledge OrganizationTaxonomy in Context Tom ReamyChief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services http://www.kapsgroup.com

  2. Agenda • Introduction: Time for Taxonomies • Business Case for Taxonomies • Taxonomy in the Organization: Intellectual Infrastructure • Content, People, Technology, Activities • Infrastructure Approach to Taxonomy • Staffing and Activities • Taxonomy Development • Conclusion • Future Directions • Building on the Intellectual Infrastructure

  3. KAPS Group • Knowledge Architecture Professional Services (KAPS) • Consulting, strategy recommendations • Knowledge architecture audits • Partners – Convera, Inxight, FAST, and others • Taxonomies: Enterprise, Marketing, Insurance, etc. • Taxonomy customization • Intellectual infrastructure for organizations • Knowledge organization, technology, people and processes • Search, content management, portals, collaboration, knowledge management, e-learning, etc.

  4. Time for Taxonomies • Taxonomy Time: Technology is not delivering • Professionals spend more time looking for information than using it • 50% of them spend > 2 hours a day looking • Search not enough – text strings vs. concepts • Relevance isn’t very relevant • Data mining misses 80% of significant content • Text mining needs more structure (taxonomies) • 70% of all ECM initiatives will fail due to an underinvestmant in taxonomy – Gartner.

  5. Time for Taxonomies: Word of Caution • Taxonomy is not the answer • Is this a taxonomy? • Inventories, catalogs, classifications, categorization schemas, thesauri, controlled vocabularies • Taxonomy not enough – need other structures • Metadata, facets • Taxonomies have to be used to be useful • How to fail: • Taxonomy as a project • Taxonomy as a search engine project afterthought

  6. Business Case for Taxonomies:The Right Context • Traditional Metrics • Time Savings – 22 minutes per user per day = $1Mil a Year • Apply to your organization – customer service, content creation, knowledge industry • Cost of not-finding = re-creating content • Research • Advantages of Browsing – Marti Hearst, Chen and Dumais • Nielsen – “Poor classification costs a 10,000 user organization $10M each year – about $1,000 per employee.” • Stories • Pain points, success and failure – in your corporate language

  7. Business Case for Taxonomies:IDC White Paper • Information Tasks • Email – 14.5 hours a week • Create documents – 13.3 hours a week • Search – 9.5 hours a week • Gather information for documents – 8.3 hours a week • Find and organize documents – 6.8 hours a week • Gartner: “Business spend an estimated $750 Billion annually seeking information necessary to do their job. 30-40% of a knowledge worker’s time is spent managing documents.”

  8. Business Case for Taxonomies:IDC White Paper • Time Wasted • Reformat information - $5.7 million per 1,000 per year (400M) • Not finding information - $5.3 million per 1,000 (370M) • Recreating content - $4.5 Million per 1,000 (315M) • Small Percent Gain = large savings • 1% - $10 million • 5% - $50 million • 10% - $100 million

  9. Business Case for Taxonomies:The Right Context • Justification • Search Engine - $500K-$2Mil • Content Management - $500K-$2Mil • Portal - $500-$2Mil • Plus maintenance and employee costs • Taxonomy • Small comparative cost • Needed to get full value from all the above • ROI – asking the wrong question • What is ROI for having an HR department? • What is ROI for organizing your company?

  10. Business Case for Taxonomies:The Right Context – Infrastructure Approach • Integrated Enterprise requires both an infrastructure team and distributed expertise. • Software and SME’s is not the answer - keywords • Taxonomies not stand alone • Metadata, controlled vocabularies, synonyms, etc. • Variety of taxonomies, plus categorization, classification, etc. • Important to know the differences, when to use which • Advanced Cognitive Differences • Panda, monkey, banana • Infrastructure as Operating System • Word vs. Word Perfect • Instead of sharing clipboard, share information and knowledge.

  11. Infrastructure Model of Taxonomy DevelopmentTaxonomy in Basic 4 Contexts • Ideas – Content Structure • Language and Mind of your organization • Applications - exchange meaning, not data • People – Company Structure • Communities, Users, Central Team • Activities – Business processes and procedures • Central team - establish standards, facilitate • Technology / Things • CMS, Search, portals, taxonomy tools • Applications – BI, CI, Text Mining

  12. Taxonomy in ContextStructuring Content • All kinds of content and Content Structures • Structured and unstructured, Internet and desktop • Metadata standards – Dublin core+ • Keywords - poor performance • Need controlled vocabulary, taxonomies, semantic network • Other Metadata • Document Type • Form, policy, how-to, etc. • Audience • Role, function, expertise, information behaviors • Best bets metadata • Facets – entities and ideas • Wine.com

  13. Taxonomy in Context:Structuring People • Individual People • Tacit knowledge, information behaviors • Advanced personalization – category priority • Sales – forms ---- New Account Form • Accountant ---- New Accounts ---- Forms • Communities • Variety of types – map of formal and informal • Variety of subject matter – vaccines, research, scuba • Variety of communication channels and information behaviors • Community-specific vocabularies, need for inter-community communication (Cortical organization model)

  14. Taxonomy in Context:Structuring Processes and Technology • Technology: infrastructure and applications • Enterprise platforms: from creation to retrieval to application • Taxonomy as the computer network • Applications – integrated meaning, not just data • Creation – content management, innovation, communities of practice (CoPs) • When, who, how, and how much structure to add • Workflow with meaning, distributed subject matter experts (SMEs) and centralized teams • Retrieval – standalone and embedded in applications and business processes • Portals, collaboration, text mining, business intelligence, CRM

  15. Taxonomy in Context:The Integrating Infrastructure • Starting point: knowledge architecture audit, K-Map • Social network analysis, information behaviors • People – knowledge architecture team • Infrastructure activities – taxonomies, analytics, best bets • Facilitation – knowledge transfer, partner with SMEs • “Taxonomies” of content, people, and activities • Dynamic Dimension – complexity not chaos • Analytics based on concepts, information behaviors • Taxonomy as part of a foundation, not a project • In an Infrastructure Context

  16. Infrastructure Solutions: The start and foundationKnowledge Architecture Audit • Knowledge Map - Understand what you have, what you are, what you want • The foundation of the foundation • Contextual interviews, content analysis, surveys, focus groups, ethnographic studies • Category modeling – “Intertwingledness” -learning new categories influenced by other, related categories • Natural level categories mapped to communities, activities • Novice prefer higher levels • Balance of informative and distinctiveness • Living, breathing, evolving foundation is the goal

  17. Infrastructure Solutions: ResourcesPeople and Processes: Roles and Functions • Knowledge Architect and learning object designers • Knowledge engineers and cognitive anthropologists • Knowledge facilitators and trainers and librarians • Part Time • Librarians and information architects • Corporate communication editors and writers • Partners • IT, web developers, applications programmers • Business analysts and project managers

  18. Infrastructure Solutions: Resources People and Processes: Central Team • Central Team supported by software and offering services • Creating, acquiring, evaluating taxonomies, metadata standards, vocabularies • Input into technology decisions and design – content management, portals, search • Socializing the benefits of metadata, creating a content culture • Evaluating metadata quality, facilitating author metadata • Analyzing the results of using metadata, how communities are using • Research metadata theory, user centric metadata • Design content value structure – more nuanced than good / poor content.

  19. Infrastructure Solutions: ResourcesPeople and Processes: Facilitating Knowledge Transfer • Need for Facilitators • Amazon hiring humans to refine recommendations • Google – humans answering queries • Facilitate projects, KM project teams • Facilitate knowledge capture in meetings, best practices • Answering online questions, facilitating online discussions, networking within a community • Design and run KM forums, education and innovation fairs • Work with content experts to develop training, incorporate intelligence into applications • Support innovation, knowledge creation in communities

  20. Infrastructure Solutions: ResourcesPeople and Processes: Location of Team • KM/KA Dept. – Cross Organizational, Interdisciplinary • Balance of dedicated and virtual, partners • Library, Training, IT, HR, Corporate Communication • Balance of central and distributed • Industry variation • Pharmaceutical – dedicated department, major place in the organization • Insurance – Small central group with partners • Beans – a librarian and part time functions • Which design – knowledge architecture audit

  21. Infrastructure Solutions: ResourcesTechnology • Taxonomy Management • Text and Visualization • Entity and Fact Extraction • Text Mining • Search for professionals • Different needs, different interfaces • Integration Platform technology • Enterprise Content Management

  22. Infrastructure Solutions: Taxonomy DevelopmentTaxonomy Model • Enterprise Taxonomy • No single subject matter taxonomy • Need an ontology of facets or domains • Standards and Customization • Balance of corporate communication and departmental specifics • At what level are differences represented? • Customize pre-defined taxonomy – additional structure, add synonyms and acronyms and vocabulary • Enterprise Facet Model: • Actors, Events, Functions, Locations, Objects, Information Resources • Combine and map to subject domains

  23. Infrastructure Solutions: Taxonomy DevelopmentInitial Development / Customization • Combination of top down and bottom up (and Essences) • Top: Design an ontology, facet selection • Bottom: Vocabulary extraction – documents, search logs, interview authors and users • Develop essential examples (Prototypes) • Most Intuitive Level – genus (oak, maple, rabbit) • Quintessential Chair – all the essential characteristics, no more • Map the taxonomy to communities and activities • Category differences • Vocabulary differences

  24. Infrastructure Solutions: Taxonomy DevelopmentEvaluate and Refine • Formal Evaluation • Quality of corpus – size, homogeneity, representative • Breadth of coverage – main ideas, outlier ideas (see next) • Structure – balance of depth and width • Practical Evaluation • Test in real life application • Test node labels with Subject Matter Experts, representative users and documents • Test with representative key concepts • Test for un-representative strange little concepts that only mean something to a few people but the people and ideas are key and are normally impossible to find

  25. Future Directions: Knowledge Organization • New analytic methods • Cognitive anthropology, history of ideas, ESNA • New metadata schemas • SCORM, RDF and semantic Web • Learning and knowledge objects • New people models • Bloom’s Taxonomy, Gardner’s 7 Intelligences • Advanced personalization • Community-based, cognitive-based • Adaptive, dynamic presentation variations

  26. Before you view: Agent keeps you up to date Your connections to content and communities, your preferences Your history and the history of other members of your communities When you add/change content Suggests categorization value, metadata values Routes to appropriate content and communities Prompt on unusual connections Pre-existing content Related content Regulatory issues Ask the question – route to experts? When you look for information Taxonomy-based dynamic browse Entities People, companies, wells Related content Regulatory, patents, BI-CI Geological data News stories Dictionaries, USGS data, databases Experts Ask questions, chat When you use information Communities Search, chat, email Performance aids, classes Stories The Contextual Desktop: Document, List of Documents, Applications Screen

  27. Questions? Tom Reamytomr@kapsgroup.com KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services http://www.kapsgroup.com

More Related