120 likes | 392 Views
Welding Procedures and Type IV Cracking Tendency - an Experimental Study. J.A. Francis School of Materials University of Manchester V. Mazur Manufacturing and Materials Technology CSIRO Australia H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia Materials Science and Metallurgy University of Cambridge. Background.
E N D
Welding Procedures and Type IV Cracking Tendency - an Experimental Study J.A. Francis School of Materials University of Manchester V. Mazur Manufacturing and Materials Technology CSIRO Australia H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia Materials Science and Metallurgy University of Cambridge
Background • Part of a collaborative project involving CSIRO Australia University of Cambridge. • Concerned with failure of welds in 9-12 wt % Cr ferritic power plant steels. • If implemented, these steels enable higher steam temperatures and pressures, greater thermodynamic efficiency, when compared with 2.25Cr-1Mo grades. • Aim: to develop technologies, procedures that ameliorate type IV cracking.
Features of Type IV failures in 9-12 Cr Steels Parent material austenitised at 1040-1080 oC, tempered at 750-780 oC Intended service temperatures of ~ 600 oC Micrographs: V. Karthik et al., Welding Journal, 81 (12), 265s, 2002. • During service, localised void formation in FGHAZ/ICHAZ • Type IV limited creep life significantly lower than for parent plate. • Type IV failures predominate when applied stress is below a threshold. ICHAZ has lowest hardness after PWHT Rupture location tends from ICHAZ to FGHAZ as stress decreases
Analysis of Published Cross-Weld Stress-Rupture Data Why Bayesian Neural Networks? Typical Network Structure • Most type IV studies have focused on the metallurgy. • Neural networks can capture mathematical relationships when physical models do not exist. • Neural networks can also perceive the relative importance of each input variable. • In a Bayesian framework, the dangers in extrapolating non-linear functions are reduced.
The Database • 53 type IV failures included in database. • Overambitious set of variables can limit data available for analysis.
Trends Results Significance of Input Variables
Creep Testing P91 pipe welds, OD 356 mm, wall thickness 51 mm Root pass + hot pass : GTAW Filling passes: FCAW Filler: 1.2 mm Supercore F91 PWHT: 760 oC for 2 hours
Stress (MPa) 0.8 kJ/mm, 30o, 250 oC 1.6 kJ/mm, 30o, 250 oC 2.4 kJ/mm, 30o, 250 oC 1.6 kJ/mm, 90o, 250 oC 1.6 kJ/mm, 0o, 250 oC 1.6 kJ/mm, 10o, 350 oC log (10) of creep life (h) Creep Testing Parameters varied: heat input, preheat temperature, joint preparation
1 mm Typical rupture surface corresponding to 0.8 kJ/mm, 250 oC, 30o
Tests in Progress 5 further tests being initiated (“follow-up programme”) Aim to separate effects of preheat temperature and joint preparation Follow up programme Initial programme 250 oC 350 oC 250 oC 350 oC 350 oC 250 oC
Conclusions • There is scope to improve “resistance” to type IV cracking through optimisation of welding procedures. • The weld heat input does not have a significant influence on propensity for type IV failure, which is in agreement with neural network predictions. • The joint preparation angle has a significant influence on type IV creep life, but the mechanism remains unclear. • Higher preheat temperatures have been predicted to improve resistance to type IV failures. Preliminary results suggest this is plausible but further tests are required to confirm effect.