240 likes | 407 Views
Impact of the Recovery School District on The East Baton Rouge Parish School System Board Workshop February 10, 2009. Purpose.
E N D
Impact of theRecovery School DistrictonThe East Baton Rouge Parish School SystemBoard WorkshopFebruary 10, 2009
Purpose • To highlight the potential impact of the Recovery School District on the East Baton Rouge Parish School System as it relates to building capacity, programs, staffing, funding, facilities, Tax Plan construction, and contractual implications. Desired Outcome • To identify possible options to address the potential impact.
Projected Financial Impact • Eight Recovery School District schools • 4,013 Students • $15.8m in MFP Funds • 21.2m in Local Funds $37.0m
Impact on School Food Service • Increased meal prices • Annual breakfast and lunch impact $1.8m • Staffing reduction • Food preparation sites • Summer feeding program
Next Steps Business and Operations • Identify alternate food preparation sites • Determine 2009 summer feeding sites • Employee notification process • Continue to evaluate district capacity • Complete fixed asset inventory of all sites • Review student transportation route impact • Assess necessary facility modifications/needs • Update the fee schedules for support services to RSD • Assess long-term financial impact to district
Next Steps Human Resources • Employee communication/notification • Notice of employee intent • Establish dates and timelines • Establish transition procedures • Assess staffing needs
Memorandum of Understanding Areas of Concern: • Parties to MOU 2. Funding 3. Oversight
Parties to MOU • MOU should be between the Board and BESE • Only BESE has the authority to place schools into the RSD and said authority should not be delegated to the LDOE • Should DOE seek to terminate the MOU for cause, the Board should have an opportunity to be heard before BESE • Current draft provides for the parties to be LEA and LDOE
MOU/Funding • MOU requires the school district to obligate itself to reimburse the RSD “all actual costs incurred…” • The MOU provides no parameters or limits within which the RSD would operate in this regard • MOU requires Board to obligate itself to an unknown amount
MOU/Oversight • Must submit candidates for school leadership positions to RSD for approval • Allow RSD access to district’s budget to provide guidance to help the district align funds • LA. Const. Art. 8 Section 3, prohibits this kind of intrusion into the affairs of local school boards
Potential impact on school sites and Options to address 2009-2010
Potential Impact to EBR Charter Schools • Children’s Charter School • Enrollment (213) • Capacity (none) • Finalize lease • J. K. Haynes Charter School • Enrollment (199) • Possible pre-K site • Finalize lease • Community School of Apprenticeship Learning • Enrollment (141) • Explore additional capacity
Re-open as a Charter School College Prep (6-12) Current Enrollment = 682 Foreign Language Immersion Pre K-8 with a high school phase-in over the next four years *New Lee HS scheduled for opening 2015-2016 Re-purpose the site Specialized Programs CKAP 6-8th grade overflow Military Academy Students opting out will be re-zoned to available high schools in the area Options for Lee HS*
Next Steps Curriculum and Instruction • Develop a plan to re-purpose Lee High School for board approval by April 2009 (see slide 18) • Develop a plan re-purpose Greenville Elementary School for board approval by April 2009 • Review grade level re-configurations • Identify impact on State Accountability • Identify transferal procedures for property, equipment, data, supplies, and student records
Summary • Communication to parents and staff • Finalize receiving schools • Identify attendance assignments • Finalize fixed asset inventories • Finalize capacity needs (modular classrooms or classroom construction) • Finalize MOU with BESE for four schools • Determine long-term financial impact • Consider legislation to reduce the impact of fixed costs (i.e., retiree health insurance)